Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-7g5wt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T21:46:01.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Imamura vs. Omori Earthquake Forecasting Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There was an ongoing public debate on earthquake forecasting in the early 20th century between two Japanese seismologists, Akitsune IMAMURA and Fusakichi OMORI. In 1905 Imamura pointed out in a magazine article that historically Tokyo had been hit by large earthquakes every 100 years on average. Imamura argued that as the last one was 50 years ago, assuming quasi-periodicity, another one could be expected in the next several tens of years. Imamura's thesis was reported sensationally in several newspaper articles in early 1906. Omori responded by making strong criticisms of Imamura's work in a magazine article. The debate flared up in 1912, and simmered in following years. On Sept. 1, 1923 the Great Kantō earthquake occurred, killing approximately 105,000 persons. Some people regarded the occurrence of the 1923 earthquake as proof that Imamura made a successful prediction and that Omori's criticisms were wrong. This episode has lessons for us even today.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2023

References

Anonymous, n.d. “Akitsune Imamura.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akitsune_Imamura. Accessed August 11, 2023.Google Scholar
Hagiwara, T., 1982. One Hundred Years of Seismology (in Japanese), Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. (萩原尊禮, 1982. 地震学百年, 東京大学出版会,東京)Google Scholar
Fuji, K., 2016. “Revisiting the ”Prediction“ Debate Over the Great Kantō Earthquake: How the Warnings of Akitsune Imamura, Who Was Called a Nonsense-Spouter, Were Ignored (in Japanese).” Research Insitute of Economy, Trade, and Industry, September 8, https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/papers/contribution/fuji-kazuhiko/23.html. Accessed August 11, 2023. (藤和彦,今こそ振り返りたい関東大震災 の「予知」論争「ホラ吹き」呼ばわりされ、無 視された今村明恒の警告)Google Scholar
Mulargia, F., Stark, P.B., Geller, R.J., 2017. “Why is Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) Still Used?Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 264, 6375, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2016.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terada, T., 1916. “Forecasting Natural Phenomena” (in Japanese), Gendai no Kagaku 4 (3), https://www.aozora.gr.jp/cards/000042/files/42700_19220.html. (寺田寅彦、 1916. 自然現象 の予報,現代之科学 第四巻第三号.)Google Scholar
Ueyama, A, 2018. The Man who Made Seismology: Fusakichi Omori (in Japanese), Tokyo: Seidosha. (上山明博,2018.地震学をつ くった男・大森房吉,青土社,東京.)Google Scholar