No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Condemning J. Mark Ramseyer’s Paper “On the Invention of Identity Politics: The Buraku Outcastes in Japan” / Mark Ramseyer の論文 “On the Invention of Identity Politics: The Buraku Outcastes in Japan” に対する非難声明
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2025
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
We, the signatories to this statement, condemn the publication of J. Mark Ramseyer’s paper “On the Invention of Identity Politics: The Buraku Outcastes in Japan,” Review of Law and Economics (RLE) 16; 2 2020. The article does not meet scholarly standards; furthermore, the foundational argument is based on a logical fallacy, blaming Burakumin for the social conditions that underlie their oppression. This is a thin, recognizably reactionary move that has no place in scholarly journals.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Authors 2021
References
Morris-Suzuki, Tessa, 2021, “The ‘Comfort Women’ Issue, Freedom of Speech, and Academic Integrity: A Study Aid,” The Asia- Pacific Journal Japan Focus, Volume 19, Issue 5, Number 12.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, 2020, “A Monitoring Theory of the Underclass: With Examples from Outcastes, Koreans, and Okinawans in Japan.” Society for Institutional & Organizational Economics (Retrieved March 7, 2021).Google Scholar
Troillot, Michel-Rolph, 2003, “Anthropology and the Savage Slot: The Poetics and Politics of the Otherness,” Global Transformations: Anthropology and the Modern World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuhiwai-Smith, Linda, 1999, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London & New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
You have
Access