Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-15T16:35:22.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflections from a darkened room

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Clive Gamble
Clive Gamble*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO9 5NH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A conference on Interpretive Archaeologies was held at Peterhouse College, Cambridge in September 1991. It sought to explore alternatives; to share rather than impose a programme for interpreting the past. Here is one reaction.

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 66 , Issue 251 , June 1992 , pp. 426 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binford, L.R. 1983. In pursuit of the past. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Gamble, C.S. In press. Figures of fun: theories about cavemen, Archaeological Review from Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J. 1980. The panda’s thumb. Harmonds-worth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hinde, R.A. & Barden, L. 1985. The evolution of the teddy bear. Anima) behaviour 33: 1371–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 1991. Reading the past. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J. 1865. Pre-Historic times, as illustrated by ancient remains and the manners and customs of modern savages. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Lyell, C. 1830–3. Principles of geology. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Moser, S. 1989. A history of reconstructions. Unpublished BA thesis. Department of Archaeology, LaTrobe University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Moser, S. 1991. Gender stereotyping in pictorial reconstructions of human origins. Paper presented at the ‘Women in Archaeology’ conference, Albury, NSW.Google Scholar
Munn, N.D. 1966. Visual categories: an approach to the study of representational systems. American Anthropologist 68: 936–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. & Bahn, P. 1991. Archaeology. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. 1976. The emergence of a visual language for geological science 1760–1840. History of Science 14: 149–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shennan, S.J. 1989. Archaeology as archaeology or as anthropology? Clarke’s Analytical archaeology and the Binfords’ New perspectives in archaeology 21 years on, Antiquity 63: 831–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. 1862. Prehistoric man. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar