Introduction
How sensitive are Antarctic ice sheets to global environmental change? When and to what extent did major Antarctic ice level variations occur in the past and will they recur in future? These are fundamental questions at the forefront of modern palaeoclimatology. As about 80% of the world's present freshwater is stored as Antarctic ice, melting of only a small fraction of ice would result in a global sea level rise, which is of prime concern to human society (Houghton et al. Reference Houghton, Ding, Griggs, Noguer, van den Linden, Dai, Maskell and Johnson2001). Considerable effort is therefore being spent to unravel the interactions between Antarctic ice volume variations and climate excursions in the past in order to predict future climate scenarios. The Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) is currently coordinating these efforts in an international research initiative, called Antarctic Climate Evolution (ACE).
It is generally believed that glaciation of East Antarctica started around the Eocene/Oligocene boundary, ~34 Ma ago (Barrett Reference Barrett1996), as atmospheric CO2 concentrations declined (DeConto & Pollard Reference DeConto and Pollard2003) and the opening of the Tasmanian Gateway and Drake Passage led to the continent's “thermal isolation” (Kennett Reference Kennett1977, Scher & Martin Reference Scher and Martin2006). Fluvial erosion sculpting dendritic valley systems ceased at the same time and temperate glaciers developed. Relict preglacial river valley systems that document the switch from fluvial to glacial landscape evolution - hence, the onset of ice growth - are observed in different areas of East Antarctica (e.g. Sugden & Denton Reference Sugden and Denton2004, Baroni et al. Reference Baroni, Noti, Ciccacci, Righini and Salvatore2005, Jamieson et al. Reference Jamieson, Hulton, Sugden, Payne and Taylor2005). From Oligocene to early Miocene times, oscillating warm-based ice existed for ~15 Ma. Naish et al. (Reference Naish, Woolfe, Barrett, Wilson, Atkins, Bohaty, Bücker, Claps, Davey, Dunbar, Dunn, Fielding, Florindo, Hannah, Harwood, Henrys, Krissek, Lavelle, van der Meer, McIntosh, Niessen, Passchier, Powell, Roberts, Sagnotti, Scherer, Strong, Talarico, Verosub, Villa, Watkins, Webb and Wonik2001) investigated offshore sediment cores and observed 46 cycles of East Antarctic glacier advance and retreat for this time period. During the middle Miocene the thermal regime of East Antarctic ice bodies changed from warm- to cold-based and a hyperarid polar climate has been established ever since (Armienti & Baroni Reference Armienti and Baroni1999, Sugden & Denton Reference Sugden and Denton2004, Lewis et al. Reference Lewis, Marchant, Ashworth, Hemming and Machlus2007). This last phase in the evolution of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) is of particular interest, because amplitude and timing of EAIS volume changes over the past million years may serve as input parameters for modelling the future climate.
High resolution data of climate and environmental parameters can be derived from Antarctic ice cores (e.g. Petit et al. Reference Petit, Jouzel, Raynaud, Barkov, Barnola, Basile, Bender, Chappellaz, Davis, Delaygue, Delmotte, Kotlyakov, Legrand, Lipenkov, Lorius, Pépin, Ritz, Saltzman and Stievenard1999, EPICA community members 2004). Their continuous records contribute significantly to the understanding of the past climate history (Wolff Reference Wolff2005). However, the stratigraphy obtained from ice cores is limited to few drilling sites and at present only records the last 740 ka (EPICA community members 2004). Furthermore, changes in ice elevation at the ice sheet margins cannot be inferred from ice cores. Therefore, detailed glacial geological and geomorphological mapping is required to reconstruct three-dimensional palaeo-ice expansions. By dating surfaces of the mapped glacial features with in situ produced cosmogenic nuclides, information about timing of the ice fluctuations can be obtained. Glacial events ranging from Holocene to middle Miocene ages can be dated by choosing the appropriate nuclides (Gosse & Phillips Reference Gosse and Phillips2001). The combination of mapping and dating of the glacial record thus yields a powerful tool for palaeoclimate studies. Key sites for applying this methodological approach and investigating the glacial response to past climate change are the presently ice free areas of Antarctica. Glacial deposits resulting from several ice sheet expansions have been recorded in these locations (e.g. Denton et al. Reference Denton, Prentice, Kellogg and Kellogg1984) and preserved over millions of years (Schäfer et al. Reference Schäfer, Ivy-Ochs, Wieler, Leya, Baur, Denton and Schlüchter1999). Recent work has shown the potential of cosmogenic nuclide analyses to reconstruct palaeoclimate and landscape evolution in Antarctica (e.g. Oberholzer et al. Reference Oberholzer, Baroni, Schaefer, Orombelli, Ivy-Ochs, Kubik, Baur and Wieler2003, Sugden et al. Reference Sugden, Balco, Cowdery, Stone and Sass2005, Fink et al. Reference Fink, McKelvey, Hambrey, Fabel and Brown2006, Mackintosh et al. Reference Mackintosh, White, Fink, Gore, Pickard and Fanning2007). Nevertheless, most studies focus on coastal areas, where outlet glaciers play a central role in drift deposition, and/or they concentrate on the most recent deglaciation chronologies. We consider that the extent and timing of major Antarctic ice level changes that occurred earlier, i.e. prior to the late Pleistocene, need further investigation.
Here, we present surface exposure ages (using the cosmogenic nuclides 10Be and 21Ne) from the Ricker Hills, a nunatak near the present-day margin of the EAIS in Victoria Land. By dating erratic boulders from late Pleistocene and pre-late Pleistocene glacial drifts in this area we directly date EAIS fluctuations. In addition to the glacial chronology, we determine amplitudes of the past ice level variations from detailed field surveys.
Study site
The Ricker Hills (75°41′S, 159°10′E) are located in the south-western part of the nearly north–south striking Prince Albert Mountains, about 100 km inland from the Ross Sea coast, in southern Victoria Land (Fig. 1). They are an ice free area of approximately 70 km2 within the David Glacier system at the margin of the EAIS. Prevailing strong katabatic winds occur in the region and keep the nunatak ice free. The nunatak ranges in elevation from 900 m to 1830 m above sea level (a.s.l.).
Fig. 1. Overview map of the David Glacier Basin, Victoria Land. The box in the lower left marks the location shown in Fig. 2a. T = Talos Dome, C = Dome C.
Geology of the area
The geological basement in southern Victoria Land is made up of the late Cambrian Granite Harbour Igneous Complex that consists largely of coarse-grained granite and granodiorite and contains minor diorite and tonalite plutons and dykes (Capponi et al. Reference Capponi, Crispini, Meccheri, Musumeci, Pertusati, Baroni, Delisle and Orsi1999). During the Palaeozoic the basement was uplifted and eroded. This led to the formation of the Kukri Peneplain, which is thought to be pre-Devonian in age (Gunn & Warren Reference Gunn and Warren1962). Above the peneplain the clastic sediments of the Beacon Supergroup rest unconformably on the basement. They predominantly consist of quartz-sandstones and coarse arkosic sandstones (Ricker Reference Ricker and Adie1964). In the southernmost outcropping area of the Ricker Hills fossil plants indicate an early Triassic age for the Beacon sediments (Capponi et al. Reference Capponi, Crispini, Meccheri, Musumeci, Pertusati, Baroni, Delisle and Orsi1999). The highest stratigraphical unit in the area is represented by Jurassic extrusive Kirkpatrick basalts and intrusive Ferrar dolerites (Ricker Reference Ricker and Adie1964). Rocks of Ferrar dolerite constitute the main outcrops of the Ricker Hills (Ricker Reference Ricker and Adie1964). Sediments from the Beacon Supergroup and Kirkpatrick basalts are restricted to very rare isolated outcrops, while no occurrence of the basement is visible at the surface today (Capponi et al. Reference Capponi, Crispini, Meccheri, Musumeci, Pertusati, Baroni, Delisle and Orsi1999).
Glaciological and geomorphological settings
The east–west flowing David Glacier is the most important outlet glacier in Victoria Land. Its floating tongue, known as the Drygalski Ice Tongue, is about 20 km wide and extends over 100 km into the Ross Sea, thus it is a distinctive element of Victoria Land's coastline (Fig. 1). With an area of 214 300 km2, David Glacier is one of the large glacier systems, draining Dome C with an annual outflow of 15.6 ± 1 km3 (Rignot & Thomas Reference Rignot and Thomas2002). The drainage can be divided into a smaller flow that slopes from Talos Dome to the Ross Sea and a main flow consisting of a network of tributaries, which drain the plateau area around Dome C and converge in a huge icefall (David Cauldron) north-west of the Ricker Hills. Ice flow around the Ricker Hills is generally SW–NE, but ice flow in an opposite direction occurs in depressions at the lee side of the nunatak (Fig. 2). Present-day ice levels in the nunatak's up- and downstream parts are ~1750 m and ~900 m a.s.l., respectively. Ice thicknesses vary considerably from site to site, reaching up to 1000 m in an adjacent sub-glacial valley east of the Ricker Hills (Delisle Reference Delisle1997).
Fig. 2. a. Geomorphological map, and b. profile (see point 14 in a. for location) of the study area and sample positions. (1) Snow and glacier ice, (2) Supraglacial debris, (3) Holocene glacial deposit (RH1), (4) Remobilized late Pleistocene glacial deposit (Holocene, arrow = flow direction), (5) Present ice free area overridden during late Pleistocene (RH3; a = moraine), (6) Late Pleistocene deglaciated area, (7) Older drift complex, early to middle Pleistocene (RH4; a = boulder alignment), (8) Ricker Hills Tillite, Oligocene (RH5), (9) Horn; (10) Older drift complex (RH4) ice flow direction, (11) Late Pleistocene ice flow direction, (12) Present ice flow direction, (13) Sample site, (14) Cross section. Contour lines from ADD (Antarctic Digital Database); dots with numbers: spot heights from GPS survey (elevation in metres).
Higher EAIS levels in the past have left substantial imprints on the surface morphology of the Ricker Hills. Areas with distinct glacial erosional and depositional features are widespread up to a certain altitude marked by a glacial trimline. Above the trimline a weakly developed alpine topography with deep cavernous weathering forms ridges and horns. This is evidence that glaciers never overrode the highest peaks after sculpturing the alpine topography. Geomorphological and glacial geological surveys of the Ricker Hills allowed at least five glacial drifts to be distinguished, hereafter informally named RH1 to RH5 (Baroni et al. Reference Baroni, Fasano, Giorgetti, Salvatore and Ribecai2008). RH1 and RH2 represent the youngest glacial drifts deposited during the Holocene and Late Glacial, respectively. They are characterized by ice-cored moraines and hummocky deposits around the current ice margin (RH1) and in the area of former ice lobes, below the late Pleistocene ice limit, where ice entered the nunatak depressions. Glacial sediments related to the late Pleistocene ice level limit (RH3) occur at higher elevations up to ~300 m above the current ice stand, sometimes with well-defined moraine ridges (Figs 2 & 3). These deposits cover broad areas of the nunatak. They are to a large part still ice-cored and can be correlated to the “Terra Nova Drift” documented in the Terra Nova Bay region by Orombelli et al. (Reference Orombelli, Baroni and Denton1991). Radiocarbon ages for the “Terra Nova Drift” in the Northern Foothills (Terra Nova Bay) bracket its age between 7.5 and 25 ka before present (Orombelli et al. Reference Orombelli, Baroni and Denton1991). A fourth unit (RH4) indicates a Pleistocene drift deposit older than RH3. Yellowish-red or red staining of boulder surfaces are typical for RH4 deposits, and clearly differ from the grey colour of the RH3 drift. Scattered erratic boulders of RH4 occur up to the top of the hills, reaching elevations of about 500 m above the present ice level. Weathering degree and occurrence of erratic boulders within this drift correspond to Orombelli et al. (Reference Orombelli, Baroni and Denton1991) observations for the “Older Drift”. The oldest unit in the relative stratigraphy of glacial deposits is the Ricker Hills Tillite (RH5). This is a semi-lithified diamicton that was deposited by a warm-based glacier most probably during Oligocene times (Baroni & Fasano Reference Baroni and Fasano2006, Baroni et al. Reference Baroni, Fasano, Giorgetti, Salvatore and Ribecai2008). Fig. 2 shows the different drifts and their spatial distribution in the investigated area (RH2 does not outcrop in this sector of the Ricker Hills) as well as the main geomorphological features.
Fig. 3. a. Older drift lobe (RH4 site beta) with boulder alignment defining the upper limit of RH4; width of the lobe ~450 m. b. Sample rhs3 from the RH4 drift lobe (note the hammer for scale). c. Sample rhs1 on the low-lying older drift (RH4 site alpha; note the hammer for scale). In the background is the horn mapped in Fig. 2a. d. Moraine in the middle of the picture delimiting the RH3 (right side) from the RH4 drift (left side). Horizontal width of the picture is ~400 m.
Sampling
When sampling for surface exposure dating we focused on the nunatak's central part, where past ice lobes entered a depression from the north-west and distinct moraine ridges or drift boundaries are preserved. A suite of seven erratic boulders was sampled from three particular locations: RH3 moraines, and two different sites of RH4, a low-lying drift surface next to the RH3 moraines (site RH4 alpha), and a higher elevated drift surface (site RH4 beta). Sample positions are indicated on Fig. 2 and partly on Fig. 3, which shows in addition two sampled erratic boulders and gives insight into the local geomorphological situation of the area.
We collected rock material from two boulders (rh06/01 and rh06/03) from RH3 moraines that were separated only by a few metres and rest on the outermost moraine ridge delimiting the RH3 from the RH4 drift (Fig. 3d). Beyond the well-defined RH3 moraines, two samples (rhs1 and rhp10) were collected from a low-lying RH4 drift (site alpha) and another three (rhs2 & 3 and rh06/06) from a higher elevated RH4 drift surface (site beta). The two highest samples (rhs3 and rh06/06) derive from erratics that belong to a boulder alignment, defining the upper limit of the RH4 drift (Fig. 3a).
All erratic boulders sampled for surface exposure age determination are Beacon sandstones, some of which have undergone slight metamorphic transformation. In the case of rhs2, the sandstone has changed completely into quartzite. In all cases, we sampled rock material from the erratic boulders' topmost 5 cm to minimize depth corrections. We performed careful field surveys in order to collect the most representative samples from a specific drift. For each boulder, its size, weathering degree, possible snow/ice cover and the likelihood of post-depositional movements were evaluated prior to sampling. Although the largest (0.35 to 2.15 m3) and most stable boulders were sampled, post-depositional overturning can never be completely excluded, because drifts were probably still ice-cored for a long time after deposition (the RH3 drift is to a major part still ice-cored today).
Surface exposure dating
The quartz-rich sandstones we sampled are appropriate for cosmogenic nuclide analyses because quartz is relatively resistant to weathering and approved techniques allow the extraction of both cosmogenic neon (Niedermann et al. Reference Niedermann, Graf and Marti1993) and beryllium (e.g. Kohl & Nishiizumi Reference Kohl and Nishiizumi1992). Cosmogenic nuclides, induced by cosmic ray spallation reactions within mineral lattices, accumulate in surface rocks in a predictable manner over time. Measuring the cosmogenic nuclide concentrations in minerals such as quartz thus allows determining how long a rock surface has been exposed to cosmic radiation (e.g. Lal Reference Lal1991, Cerling & Craig Reference Cerling and Craig1994). Coverage by, for example, glacial till, snow or ice can, however, reduce or completely stop cosmogenic nuclide production. Beneath more than about 5 m of ice, rock surfaces are essentially completely shielded from cosmic rays (Fabel & Harbor Reference Fabel and Harbor1999). When studying exposure ages of erratic boulders it is generally assumed that no cosmogenic nuclides are initially present prior to deposition and accumulation of cosmogenic nuclides starts with the melt-out (~deposition) of the boulder from the ice (i.e. a “simple exposure history”). This implies that the original surfaces of the erratic boulders were either completely shielded from incoming cosmic rays or glacial erosion exceeded ~2 m (the maximum depth at which a rock experiences a sizeable secondary cosmic ray particle flux) and removed all inherited nuclides from previous exposure times (Fabel & Harbor Reference Fabel and Harbor1999). However, in polar regions glacial erosion might not exceed this value and after retreat of a cold-based ice body, the overridden rock surfaces or erratic boulders may still contain some cosmogenic nuclides from an exposure period prior to the last ice advance (called a “complex exposure history”). To identify such a complex exposure history scenario and check whether a surface was intermittently shielded for a substantial period (= “burial period”) a combined analysis of a stable and radioactive or two radioactive nuclides is necessary. During burial the ratio of the two nuclides changes (e.g. the 21Ne/10Be ratio increases), due to radioactive decay.
Analysis of two independent nuclides enables us to obtain two exposure ages for each sample. Such cross-dating significantly increases our confidence in the reliability of an exposure age. Furthermore, in combination two or more different cosmogenic nuclide measurements from the same sample may yield valuable information about the sample-specific erosion rate and, as noted above, the exposure history (Lal Reference Lal1991, Gosse & Phillips Reference Gosse and Phillips2001). In order to determine surface exposure ages from the Ricker Hills and to benefit from the potential of multiple nuclide analyses, we extracted and measured both cosmogenic 21Ne and 10Be from the erratic boulders we sampled.
Sample preparation
Rock samples were mainly processed at the Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern. In a first step the rocks were crushed and sieved into grain sizes between 0.25 and 0.4 mm. In a second stage magnetic separation was applied to remove magnetic minerals before the samples were put into hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acids to chemically isolate quartz according to Kohl & Nishiizumi (Reference Kohl and Nishiizumi1992). A split of each purified quartz separate was then kept for noble gas analysis, while the rest underwent further chemical processing to extract 10Be following standard procedures. The quartz splits for the 21Ne measurements were further crushed to grain sizes< 0.1 mm and cleaned in an ultrasonic bath. The suspended finest fraction was subsequently decanted.
Cosmogenic nuclide measurements
Radionuclide analyses were carried out at the accelerator mass spectrometry facility of PSI/ETH Zurich. 10Be/9Be ratios were measured according to the method described by Synal et al. (Reference Synal, Bonani, Döbeli, Ender, Gartenmann, Kubik, Schnabel and Suter1997) and used to calculate 10Be concentrations. Cosmogenic 21Ne was analysed in the noble gas laboratories of the Institute of Isotope Geochemistry and Mineral Resources at ETH Zurich. Samples of 40–60 mg quartz were measured in a non-commercial ultra-high sensitivity mass spectrometer with a special ion source (see Baur Reference Baur1999 for details). Noble gases were extracted from the samples through step-wise heating at 600, 800, and 1750°C to separate the cosmogenic from the non-cosmogenic (trapped and nucleogenic) neon components (Niedermann et al. Reference Niedermann, Graf and Marti1993).
Age calculation
All exposure ages were calculated with CosmoCalc 1.0 (Vermeesch Reference Vermeesch2007), using altitude and latitude production rate scaling factors defined for the Antarctic region by Stone (Reference Stone2000), sea level high latitude production rates for 21Ne and 10Be of 20.3 and 5.1 atoms per gram quartz per year, respectively (Niedermann Reference Niedermann2000, Stone Reference Stone2000), an attenuation length (Λ) of 157 gram per cm2 and default values for all other parameters. The 21Ne concentrations used in the calculations derive from the neon excesses above air (21Neexc) of the 600°C temperature steps under the assumption of entirely atmospheric 20Ne concentrations. All relevant neon and beryllium isotope data for exposure age determination are shown in Table I and the neon three-isotope distribution is illustrated in Fig. 4. Details of the noble gas data are explained in the next section.
Fig. 4. Neon three-isotope diagrams. The line in the graphs is the atmospheric-cosmogenic mixing line for quartz, described by Niedermann et al. (Reference Niedermann, Graf and Marti1993). a. Data points from this study (error limits are 1σ). The dashed box shows the area of the diagram shown in b. b. An enlargement of the data that have low neon ratios. Sample abbreviations: 1–3 represent samples rhs1 to 3, 10 represents sample rhp10, 01–06 represent samples rh06/01, 03 and 06.
Table I. Neon and beryllium isotope data.
Errors are 1σ and include uncertainties for the variability of chemical processing for the radionuclide, and statistical, sensitivity, and mass-discrimination errors for the noble gas measurements. Absolute errors of neon abundances are not included in the noble gas data, but are about 2% as determined with two independent air-calibrations. 21Neexc is the calculated 21Ne excess over air.
We corrected each date based on the slope of the sampled surface, topographic shielding by surrounding hills and mountains (Dunne et al. Reference Dunne, Elmore and Muzikar1999), and for the sample thickness (Gosse & Phillips Reference Gosse and Phillips2001). A correction for shielding of the sampled erratic boulders by intermittent snow cover was not included in the calculations. Due to strong prevailing katabatic winds, we think it is unlikely that enough snow could accumulate to cover the erratic boulders (which have heights between 50 and 150 cm). Exposure age corrections due to past geomagnetic intensity variations that affected cosmogenic nuclide production are not required for latitudes greater than about 60° (e.g. Cerling & Craig Reference Cerling and Craig1994). However, one effect that cannot be neglected is erosion. To account for erosion we determined sample-specific neon-beryllium erosion rates from an erosion island plot (Fig. 5) and adopted these values to calculate erosion-corrected ages. Sample-specific information and exposure ages calculated with a range of erosion rates are listed in Table II.
Fig. 5. Erosion island plot for all samples showing the effect of erosion on relative concentrations (normalized to sea level and high latitude) of 21Ne and 10Be for different erosion rates (solid lines). Dashed line connects steady-state erosion end points, the ratios where cosmogenic 21Ne does not accumulate any more due to erosion. The grey zone is known as steady-state erosion island (Lal Reference Lal1991). Samples with continuous exposure histories plot within the erosion island depending on erosion rates, whereas data plotting above indicate complex exposure. Open symbols mark the samples with possible non-cosmogenic 21Ne contributions (rhs1, rh06/06) and therefore might plot too high in the diagram. The graph was produced using the calculation parameters indicated in the text and caption of Table II.
Table II. Calculated exposure ages.
Exposure age calculations are based on sea level high latitude production rates P10 = 5.1 at/g/yr (Stone Reference Stone2000), P21 = 20.3 at/g/yr (Niedermann Reference Niedermann2000) and the scaling model of Stone (Reference Stone2000). Correction factor includes geometric shielding and sample thickness (using Λ = 157 g cm-2 and ρ = 2.65 g cm-3). RH4α and RH4β represent samples from the RH4 drift sites alpha and beta respectively. Apparent = no erosion. Erosion-corrected ages for two reasonable erosion rates (ɛ = 35 and 45 cm Ma-1, respectively) are given (see text and Fig. 5).
Results
Surface exposure ages of all investigated erratic boulders are compiled in Table II. For each erratic boulder two independent exposure ages (neon and beryllium) are available. The apparent 21Ne and 10Be ages (assuming no erosion) range from 70 ± 8 to 951 ± 15 ka and from 49 ± 3 to 900 ± 27 ka, respectively, and show broad agreement between each other.
Only the 600°C temperature steps were used to determine neon exposure ages, because most of the cosmogenic neon is released from quartz below this temperature and the higher temperature steps (800, 1750°C) usually contain non-cosmogenic neon components (Niedermann et al. Reference Niedermann, Graf and Marti1993). The cosmogenic origin of the 600°C steps is confirmed by the positions of the associated data points in the Neon three-isotope diagram (Fig. 4). With the exceptions of rhs1 & 2 and rh06/06 they lie within errors on the atmospheric-cosmogenic mixing line. Within two-sigma confidence limits also the rhs2 point falls on the line, while data points of the other two samples still plot below the line. The 21Neexc of the 600°C steps of rhs1 and rh06/06 might therefore not consist of cosmogenic neon only but contain additional non-atmospheric neon components, leading to an overestimation of the neon exposure ages. For this reason, 21Ne dates for rhs1 and rh06/06 are not considered in the conclusions.
Among the total dataset the oldest exposure ages (apparent 10Be ages from 575 ± 19 to 900 ± 27 ka) come from the high-elevated RH4 drift (site beta). Apparent 10Be dates from the two other sampling locations (Fig. 2) are considerably younger and range from 69 ± 2 to 230 ± 7 ka for the lower-lying RH4 drift (site alpha) and from 49 ± 3 to 106 ± 3 ka in the case of the RH3 moraines. When taking erosion into account, exposure ages are shifted towards older dates. The older a sample and/or the higher the erosion rate, the larger the shift is (Table II).
Discussion
From the geomorphological position and weathering degree the older drift complex (RH4) is supposed to be older than late Pleistocene (Baroni et al. Reference Baroni, Fasano, Giorgetti, Salvatore and Ribecai2008). But when did ice retreat from these surfaces, and as a consequence, when did cosmogenic nuclide production start? As Table II reveals, the RH4 drift (apparent 10Be exposure ages 69 ± 2 ka to 900 ± 27 ka) generally predates the late Pleistocene, but no clear age cluster defines the timing of deglaciation. From the two investigated RH4 sites (alpha & beta) the lower lying site alpha yields much younger apparent exposure ages (10Be ages 69 ± 2 ka and 230 ± 7 ka) than the higher elevated site beta (10Be dates from 575 ± 19 ka to 900 ± 27 ka), which points to an unequal drift evolution. Thus, the glacial situation seems to be more complex than expected from glacial geological and geomorphological surveys and requires careful data interpretation in order to reconstruct the glacial chronology of the Ricker Hills.
Although there is broad agreement between neon and beryllium apparent ages of the analysed erratic boulders, there are small but important 21Ne and 10Be age differences (all 21Ne ages are older than 10Be ages), which reveal valuable information about drift evolution. All erratic boulders from RH3 and low-lying RH4 (site alpha) drift surfaces have 21Ne and 10Be age differences that cannot be explained by continuous exposure because in Fig. 5 the 21Ne/10Be ratios plot above the erosion island in the complex exposure zone. The differences between the 21Ne and 10Be dates of these samples are most probably due to burial of the erratic boulders beneath non-erosive cold-based ice. Burial by ice plays an important role in Antarctica and limits the potential of cosmogenic nuclide dating under polar conditions (Sugden et al. Reference Sugden, Balco, Cowdery, Stone and Sass2005, Di Nicola et al. Reference Di Nicola, Strasky, Schlüchter, Salvatore, Kubik, Ivy-Ochs, Wieler, Akçar, Baroni, Cooper and Raymond2007). By contrast to the complex exposure histories of boulders from the low-lying surfaces, paired nuclide analyses of all erratic boulders from the high-elevated RH4 (site beta) surface indicate simple exposure histories (Fig. 5). This suggests that in the early Pleistocene ice levels reached the highest elevations in the Ricker Hills (up to ~500 m above present-day ice levels) and subsequent EAIS variations were of lesser extent. During the middle Pleistocene the highest areas (including RH4 site beta) were ice free and only low elevations of RH4 (e.g. site alpha) close to RH3 deposits were intermittently ice covered.
Effect of complex exposure
The signature of complex exposure is observed throughout the low-elevated drifts RH4 site alpha and RH3. As stated earlier, one of the major processes leading to the evolution of complex glacial surfaces is intermittent burial by ice. With a very simple scenario - assuming no erosion and a simple exposure and a subsequent burial period - we can calculate a burial age from the nuclide concentrations. For rhp10 for example this would be in the order of ~400 ka and a total exposure-burial history (burial age + apparent 21Ne exposure age) of ~665 ka would result. Although this scenario is far from reality it gives an idea of how much burial time is needed to accommodate a rather small age difference obtained from two nuclides. Our results suggest that cold-based ice probably covered the low-lying RH4 surfaces of the Ricker Hills for a considerable time. Such a scenario may also apply to the evolution of the RH3 drift. A similar theoretical exposure-burial quantification for rh06/01 as for rhp10 reveals a total exposure-burial history of ~1.1 Ma. Hence, the late Pleistocene ice advance probably entrained older erratic boulders and deposited them on RH3 moraines leading to deceptive old exposure ages.
On the contrary, overturning during reworking and/or rearrangements of erratic boulders after initial deposition due to melting processes in ice-cored drifts or periglacial activities can result in falsely young ages and further add to the complexity of such deposits. Continuous post-depositional movements of 1 mm per year (seasonal changes summer–winter) would be large enough to overturn a boulder during its exposure period. Putkonen et al. (Reference Putkonen, Balco and Morgan2008) measured regolith degradation in the McMurdo Dry Valleys of about 2 m Ma-1 in a soil that is presently free of ice and visible moisture and was previously considered as a stable surface.
Burial by cold-based ice and post-depositional surface rearrangements lead to complex drift deposits that pose a challenging issue for surface exposure dating. Studying special geomorphological features like perched-boulders or pairs of erratics and glacially scoured bedrock as well as exposure histories of different surfaces (fully exposed and (partially) shielded) from the same boulder might help to address this issue in future. Furthermore, surface exposure dating with in situ produced cosmogenic 14C could contribute to decipher the late Pleistocene glacial chronology, due to its short half-life compared to 10Be. Nevertheless, the identification of complex drifts demands multiple cosmogenic nuclide analyses since single nuclide exposure ages may result in misinterpretation of the glacial geological situation.
Effect of erosion
Erosion of the sampled erratic boulders during exposure times has continuously removed cosmogenic nuclides, hence lowered the apparent exposure ages. Correcting for erosion thus shifts the dates towards older exposure ages (Table II), which are more realistic as long as the adopted erosion rates reflect time-averaged local conditions. Erosion rates are generally very low in Antarctica due to the hyperarid polar climate; however, even extremely low erosion rates could significantly affect samples with apparent exposure ages in the order of several hundred thousand to million years (e.g. Schäfer et al. Reference Schäfer, Ivy-Ochs, Wieler, Leya, Baur, Denton and Schlüchter1999). That erosion has to be considered in the study area is obvious from weathered boulders of RH4 deposits, which sometimes show cavernous weathering (Fig. 3b).
For the oldest two samples it was possible to determine erosion rates from a neon-beryllium erosion island plot (Fig. 5). The resulting erosion rates are 20–45 cm Ma-1 for the quartzite rhs2 and 10–65 cm Ma-1 for the sandstone sample rhs3 (accounting for the errors in 21Ne and 10Be), with best-fit values of 35 and 45 cm Ma-1, respectively. These erosion rates are higher than previously reported for sandstone boulders (Ivy-Ochs et al. Reference Ivy-Ochs, Schlüchter, Kubik, Dittrich-Hannen and Beer1995, Schäfer et al. Reference Schäfer, Ivy-Ochs, Wieler, Leya, Baur, Denton and Schlüchter1999) or granite bedrock (Oberholzer et al. Reference Oberholzer, Baroni, Schaefer, Orombelli, Ivy-Ochs, Kubik, Baur and Wieler2003, Di Nicola et al. Reference Di Nicola, Strasky, Schlüchter, Salvatore, Kubik, Ivy-Ochs, Wieler, Akçar, Baroni, Cooper and Raymond2007), but are close to the values (17–41 cm Ma-1) described by Oberholzer et al. (Reference Oberholzer, Baroni, Salvatore, Baur and Wieler2008) for the nearby dolerite gargoyles and within the denudation range of sandstone bedrock indicated by Summerfield et al. (Reference Summerfield, Stuart, Cockburn, Sugden, Denton, Dunai and Marchant1999) for the McMurdo Dry Valleys area (13.3–60 cm Ma-1). Adopting these erosion rates increases the exposure ages of the samples for the high-elevated RH4 drift (rhs3 & 2) by roughly 45% to ~1000 and ~1400 ka (Table II).
The effect of erosion on calculated exposure ages is illustrated in Fig. 6 for both samples and the whole range of determined erosion rates. Figure 6 shows that erosion-corrected exposure ages of rhs2 and rhs3 overlap between 1125 and 1375 ka. This concordance leads us to believe that the high-elevated RH4 drift was deposited most likely during this time period. Accepting this implies erosion rates of ~20–35 cm Ma-1 for the quartzite and ~53–65 cm Ma-1 for the sandstone boulder (Fig. 6). These erosion rates differ only slightly from the graphically determined best-fit values (35 and 45 cm Ma-1, Fig. 5) and seem to reflect sample-specific erosion rates most accurately for the given situation. Weathering degree and rock fragmentation of sampled boulders already suggested relatively lower erosion rates for the quartzite than for the sandstone sample in the field, which is confirmed with this finding.
Fig. 6. Erosion-corrected exposure ages for the sample-specific range of erosion rates. The light grey horizontal band highlights the age overlap between 1125 and 1375 ka.
Erosion has a less significant effect on exposure ages of younger samples. As a consequence, erosion-corrected cosmogenic nuclide ages for the low-lying RH4 drift (site alpha) and the RH3 surfaces generally vary less than ten percent from their apparent (no erosion) ages (Table II).
Conclusions
A deeply weathered glacial deposit (RH4), comparable to the “Older Drift” described in the Terra Nova Bay area by Orombelli et al. (Reference Orombelli, Baroni and Denton1991), indicates a major EAIS advance in the Ricker Hills, Victoria Land, beyond the late Pleistocene drift limit. Apparent surface exposure ages based on cosmogenic 21Ne and 10Be for this older drift complex (RH4) confirms a pre-late Pleistocene age of the deposit, but at the same time suggests multiple episodes of glacial deposition. From our investigation we can divide the RH4 drift into two units, a lower (site alpha) and a higher elevated zone (site beta). The latter contains erratic boulders up to ~500 m above present-day ice levels and its ages (apparent 10Be ages from 575 ± 19 to 900 ± 27 ka) give evidence for a major early Pleistocene EAIS advance. Erosion-corrected exposure ages from this surface, including a well-defined boulder alignment from the highest outcrops of this elevated drift zone, suggest that the major ice advance occurred between 1125 and 1375 ka ago. Deposits from this glacial event seem to be only locally preserved, because subsequent ice advances possibly reworked other deposits of the same glacial phase. The range of erosion rates used to correct exposure ages were obtained from an erosion island diagram and are 10–65 cm Ma-1 for a sandstone and 20–45 cm Ma-1 for a quartzite.
The lower-lying RH4 drift unit (site alpha) represents a more complex deposit. Burial by cold-based ice seems to have played a major role in the evolution of the present surface. However, also other processes like reworking of older deposits and possibly post-depositional movements of the sub-surface could have affected the drift. Cosmogenic nuclide analyses of our samples do not allow determination of an accurate deposition age for this unit. But they indicate that the low-lying RH4 drift close to the RH3 drift was overridden by at least another Pleistocene ice advance, leaving the higher elevated surfaces unburied.
These results are important because the location of the Ricker Hills at the margin of the EAIS points to the conclusion that: 1) the nunatak has not been overridden by the EAIS during middle and late Pleistocene, 2) the position reached by the upper lobe (site beta) represents the maximum thickening of the EAIS during the entire Pleistocene, 3) glacial landforms in the Ricker Hills are older than the early Pleistocene and could date from the Pliocene or earlier, in accordance with Baroni et al. (Reference Baroni, Fasano, Giorgetti, Salvatore and Ribecai2008), 4) the low erosion rates imply that the modern cold, arid climate has persisted since at least the early Pleistocene. This is in agreement with findings from northern Victoria Land (Oberholzer et al. Reference Oberholzer, Baroni, Schaefer, Orombelli, Ivy-Ochs, Kubik, Baur and Wieler2003) and from sites further afield, such as the Shackleton Range (Fogwill et al. Reference Fogwill, Bentley, Sugden, Kerr and Kubik2004) and the northern Prince Charles Mountains (Fink et al. Reference Fink, McKelvey, Hambrey, Fabel and Brown2006).
Cosmogenic nuclide measurements for the late Pleistocene deposit (RH3) in the Ricker Hills yield exposure ages that clearly pre-date the last glacial maximum (~21 ka) and indicate a complex drift evolution. One or more processes leading to complex deposits as noted above for the low-lying RH4 drift could also explain the data scatter of the samples from the RH3 moraine. Additional samples need to be investigated with special regard to complex exposure in order to reconstruct the evolution of the RH3 drift in the Ricker Hills.
Our study of glacial deposits in the Ricker Hills showed that at least two EAIS variations occurred during the early to middle Pleistocene, and that these fluctuations were of limited amplitudes of less than ~500 m. However, multiple cold-based ice advances can pose substantial difficulties for cosmogenic nuclide chronologies. Combined nuclide analyses are therefore a prerequisite for any meaningful surface exposure dating in polar areas and are needed to further complete the picture of how the EAIS reacted to Pleistocene climate change.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Italian National Program on Antarctic Research (PNRA) and the Swiss National Science Foundation grant number: 200020-1052201/1. We gratefully acknowledge their support. Many thanks to F. Mancini for GPS survey of spot heights. We would like to thank the members of the XX and XXI Italian Antarctic Expeditions and the pilots of Helicopter New Zealand, who contributed greatly to successful sampling campaigns. Finally, we wish to thank David Marchant, Chris Fogwill and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.
