Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-hpxsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T14:52:59.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seabird breeding population size on the Antarctic Peninsula related to fisheries activities in non-breeding ranges off South America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2017

Lucas Krüger*
Affiliation:
MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, University of Coimbra, Department of Life Sciences, Coimbra, Portugal Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Antárctico de Pesquisas Ambientais – INCT-APA, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Vitor H. Paiva
Affiliation:
MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, University of Coimbra, Department of Life Sciences, Coimbra, Portugal
Maria V. Petry
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ornitologia e Animais Marinhos, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Antárctico de Pesquisas Ambientais – INCT-APA, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Jaime A. Ramos
Affiliation:
MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, University of Coimbra, Department of Life Sciences, Coimbra, Portugal
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Population growth of the southern giant petrel Macronectes giganteus from South America has been linked with an increase in fishing activities. It was demonstrated recently that a population from Elephant Island, Antarctic Peninsula, largely overlaps its non-breeding distribution with zones of high fishing intensity off South America. This study investigated the assumption that the increase in this population since the 1980s is related to an increase in fisheries off South America. Our results show that the population size is proportional to the increase in demersal and squid fisheries. These fisheries produce a considerable amount of discards, which can be used by non-breeding southern giant petrels as a food source during unfavourable conditions in winter. This may enhance the adult survival rates with potential carry-over effects on population size. Our study shows that we need to further understand the effects of fishery discards/offal on scavenging seabirds of the Southern Ocean, and highlights the importance of understanding the carry-over effects of seabird–fisheries interactions during the non-breeding phase in population dynamics.

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2017 

Introduction

For several seabird species, the consumption of fisheries discards can lead to population increases in the long term (Furness Reference Furness2003). In the Southern Ocean, the southern giant petrel (SGP) Macronectes giganteus (Gmelin) is one of the main scavenging seabirds, whose recent population increase can be attributed to interaction with fishing activities, i.e. feeding on fishing discards (Copello & Quintana Reference Copello and Quintana2003, Quintana et al. Reference Quintana, Punta, Copello and Yorio2006) or on animals injured or killed during fishing activities (González-Zevallos & Yorio Reference González-Zevallos and Yorio2006). Recently, Krüger et al. (Reference Krüger, Paiva, Petry and Ramos2017) confirmed that a population of SGP from the Antarctic Peninsula shift their distribution to Argentina and the Falkland Islands off-waters during the non-breeding season, where they overlap with areas of higher fishing intensity. Increases in Argentine populations of SGP were attributed to feeding on discards from trawlers and jiggers (Copello & Quintana Reference Copello and Quintana2003, Reference Copello and Quintana2009, Quintana et al. Reference Quintana, Punta, Copello and Yorio2006). The bycatch rates are relatively low for SGP (Favero et al. Reference Favero, Blanco, García, Copello, Pon, Frere, Quintana, Yorio, Rabuffetti, Canete and Gandini2011, Yeh et al. Reference Yeh, Huang, Dietrich and Melvin2013), so there are negligible negative effects of their interaction with fisheries. Assuming that the interaction with fisheries might have an influence on SGP population numbers, we evaluated the relationship between fishing catches within the current non-breeding distribution and the population numbers of SGP on Elephant Island between 1985 and 2011.

Methods

The study was conducted on Stinker Point, Elephant Island (61.17°S, 55.35°W; Fig. 1a). All incubating birds (breeding pairs) on Stinker Point were counted between 1985 and 1992 and between 2009 and 2011. The relationship between SGP number of breeding pairs and fisheries catches was evaluated by applying Poisson linear regressions over the residuals of the annual variability of the number of breeding pairs (breeding pairs ~ (1/year)) and fisheries catches (fisheries catch ~ (1/year)) from generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) in the lmerTest R package (Kuznetsova et al. Reference Kuznetsova, Brockhoff and Bojesen2016). Fishing catches were extracted from FishStatJ 3.01.0 for the Argentina, Uruguay and the Falkland Islands Economic Exclusive Zones (EEZs; Fig. 1a & b), as these are the areas mainly used by the SGPs from Stinker Point during the non-breeding season (Krüger et al. Reference Krüger, Paiva, Petry and Ramos2017; Fig. 1a). Fisheries were classified according to FAOSTAT groups in FishStatJ.

Fig. 1 a. Non-breeding foraging area (hashed polygon) of southern giant petrels (SGPs) from Stinker Point, Elephant Island (star), off South America (from Krüger et al. Reference Krüger, Paiva, Petry and Ramos2017). The Economic Exclusive Zones (EEZs) for each country are indicated by grey lines. b. Historical trends of fish landings (tons) from fisheries off the Falkland Islands, Argentina and Uruguay between 1980 and 2012. Data are loess mean trend ± standard deviation. c. The annual residuals of the historical annual catches (tons) for fisheries off South America between 1985 and 2011 and the number of SGP breeding pairs. The lines represent the linear mean trend ± standard deviation.

Results

The SGP population on Stinker Point increased from 648 breeding pairs in 1985 to 983 pairs in 2011 (Table I). Fisheries catches were higher off the Falkland Islands and Argentina from the mid-1990s until 2012 compared with the 1980s, but a decreasing trend is seen off Uruguay (Fig. 1b). The annual variability of the number of breeding pairs was proportional to the annual variability of squid (r 2=0.419, F 1,9=6.49, β=12.967, P=0.031) and demersal (r 2=0.410, F 1,9=4.863, β=12.165, P=0.034) fisheries, but was not related to pelagic (r 2=0.207, F 1,9=2.344, β=5.016, P=0.160) or coastal (r 2=0.171, F 1,9=1,860, β=1.476, P=0.206) fisheries (Fig. 1c).

Table I Annual variability of fisheries catch (thousands of tons) off Patagonian waters by type (classified according to FISHTAT group) and number of breeding pairs of southern giant petrels at Stinker Point, Elephant Island.

Discussion

Fisheries are assumed to be the main factor contributing to population increases of SGPs from Argentina (Quintana et al. Reference Quintana, Punta, Copello and Yorio2006, Copello et al. Reference Copello, Quintana and Pérez2008, Copello & Quintana Reference Copello and Quintana2009). It is likely that a similar process is occurring in the population from Elephant Island as there is an area of the non-breeding distribution that overlaps with areas of high fishing activity off Argentina and the Falkland Islands with strong evidence for interactions with fishing vessels, particularly for squid (Krüger et al. Reference Krüger, Paiva, Petry and Ramos2017). Discards from squid fisheries may comprise 0.5–6.0% of the total catch (Kelleher Reference Kelleher2005, Arkhipkin et al. Reference Arkhipkin, Rodhouse and Pierce2015), which can be substantial when catches are estimated at 70 000–270 000 tonnes annually (Arkhipkin et al. Reference Arkhipkin, Rodhouse and Pierce2015). Furthermore, there is evidence that SGPs may scavenge and predate on seabirds killed or injured by fishing gear or cables (González-Zevallos & Yorio Reference González-Zevallos and Yorio2006).

Evidence suggests that consumption of fishery discards during non-breeding periods can increase population survival rates when natural sources of food are low, leading to increases in population size (Furness Reference Furness2003, Grémillet et al. Reference Grémillet, Pichegru, Kuntz, Woakes, Wilkinson, Crawford and Ryan2008, Österblom et al. Reference Österblom, Olsson, Blenckner and Furness2008). Whilst several SGP populations from the sub-Antarctic and temperate regions are increasing (Cuthbert & Sommer Reference Cuthbert and Sommer2004, Quintana et al. Reference Quintana, Punta, Copello and Yorio2006, Copello et al. Reference Copello, Quintana and Pérez2008, Reid & Huin Reference Reid and Huin2008, Copello & Quintana Reference Copello and Quintana2009), populations near or south of 60°S show highly variable trends (Sander et al. Reference Sander, Carneiro, Balbao, Bays, Costa, Mascarello, Oliva and dos Santos2005, Lynch et al. Reference Lynch, Naveen and Fagan2008, Patterson et al. Reference Patterson, Woehler, Croxall, Cooper, Poncet, Peter, Hunter and Fraser2008, Petry et al. Reference Petry, Valls, Petersen, Krüger, Piuco and dos Santos2016). Colonies may be exposed to the effects of human presence locally (such as tourism and research stations; e.g. Sander et al. Reference Sander, Carneiro, Balbao, Bays, Costa, Mascarello, Oliva and dos Santos2005) but the large-scale effects (i.e. climate; see Krüger et al. Reference Krüger, Sander and Petry2012, Schulz et al. Reference Schulz, Krüger and Petry2014) to which populations in the same archipelago (i.e. South Shetland Islands) are exposed are similar, suggesting that differences in the non-breeding distribution could be acting to generate differences in the population breeding performance. We envisage the possibility that such large localized differences on high latitude populations (Sander et al. Reference Sander, Carneiro, Balbao, Bays, Costa, Mascarello, Oliva and dos Santos2005, Lynch et al. Reference Lynch, Naveen and Fagan2008, Patterson et al. Reference Patterson, Woehler, Croxall, Cooper, Poncet, Peter, Hunter and Fraser2008, Petry et al. Reference Petry, Valls, Petersen, Krüger, Piuco and dos Santos2016) may be caused by variability in the interaction with fisheries during the non-breeding period. Nonetheless, to the best of our knowledge, there is no tracking data from populations breeding south of 60°S to support this hypothesis. Tracking studies from such populations would help to elucidate this matter. Finally, our study shows that we need to further understand the effects of fishery discards/offal on scavenging seabirds of the Southern Ocean, and highlights the importance of understanding the carry-over effects of the interactions of seabirds with fisheries during non-breeding seasons on population dynamics.

Acknowledgements

LK acknowledges CNPq for his PhD scholarship (245540/2012-1). VHP acknowledges the support given by FCT (SFRH/BPD/85024/2012). We acknowledge the Brazilian Navy for field research support in Antarctica, the National Institute of Science and Technology Antarctic Environmental Research (INCT-APA), CNPq (574018/2008-5) and FAPERJ (E-16/170.023/2008). We acknowledge the support of the Brazilian Ministries of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI), Environment (MMA), and Inter-Ministry Commission for Sea Resources (CIRM). This study benefited from the MARE strategic programme, financed by FCT (MARE - UID/MAR/04292/2013). We thank Jessica Hey for the English review. We also thank the reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author contribution

LK, VHP and JAR conceived the study. LK and MVP collected data. LK analysed the data. LK led the writing of the paper with input from all of the co-authors.

References

Arkhipkin, A.I., Rodhouse, P.G.K., Pierce, G.J. & 52 others . 2015. World squid fisheries. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 10.1080/23308249.2015.1026226.Google Scholar
Copello, S. & Quintana, F. 2003. Marine debris ingestion by southern giant petrels and its potential relationships with fisheries in the southern Atlantic Ocean. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00312-6.Google Scholar
Copello, S. & Quintana, F. 2009. Spatio-temporal overlap between the at-sea distribution of southern giant petrels and fisheries at the Patagonian Shelf. Polar Biology, 10.1007/s00300-009-0620-7.Google Scholar
Copello, S., Quintana, F. & Pérez, F. 2008. Diet of the southern giant petrel in Patagonia: fishery-related items and natural prey. Endangered Species Research, 10.3354/esr00118.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, R.J. & Sommer, E.S. 2004. Population size and trends of four globally threatened seabirds at Gough Island, south Atlantic Ocean. Marine Ornithology, 32, 97103.Google Scholar
Favero, M., Blanco, G., García, G., Copello, S., Pon, J.P.S., Frere, E., Quintana, F., Yorio, P., Rabuffetti, F., Canete, G. & Gandini, P. 2011. Seabird mortality associated with ice trawlers in the Patagonian shelf: effect of discards on the occurrence of interactions with fishing gear. Animal Conservation, 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00405.x.Google Scholar
Furness, R.W. 2003. Impacts of fisheries on seabird communities. Scientia Marina, 10.3989/scimar.2003.67s233.Google Scholar
González-Zevallos, D. & Yorio, P. 2006. Seabird use of discards and incidental captures at the Argentine hake trawl fishery in the Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 10.3354/meps316175.Google Scholar
Grémillet, D., Pichegru, L., Kuntz, G., Woakes, A.G., Wilkinson, S., Crawford, R.J.M. & Ryan, P.G. 2008. A junk-food hypothesis for gannets feeding on fishery waste. Proceedings of the Royal Society - Biological Sciences, 10.1098/rspb.2007.1763.Google Scholar
Kelleher, K. 2005. Discards in the world’s marine fisheries. An update. FAO fisheries technical paper no. 470. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 131 pp.Google Scholar
Krüger, L., Sander, M. & Petry, M.V. 2012. Annual activity report 2011 – responses of an Antarctic southern giant petrel population to climate change. São Carlos: National Institute of Science and Technology Antarctic Environmental Research, 10.4322/apa.2014.066.Google Scholar
Krüger, L., Paiva, V.H., Petry, M.V. & Ramos, J.A. 2017. Strange lights in the night: using abnormal peaks of light in geolocator data to infer interaction of seabirds with nocturnal fishing vessels. Polar Biology, 10.1007/s00300-016-1933-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B. & Bojesen, R.H. 2016. Tests in linear mixed effects model. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/lmerTest.pdf.Google Scholar
Lynch, H.J., Naveen, R. & Fagan, W.F. 2008. Censuses of penguin, blue-eyed shag Phalacrocorax atriceps and southern giant petrel Macronectes giganteus populations on the Antarctic Peninsula, 2001–2007. Marine Ornithology, 36, 8397.Google Scholar
Österblom, H., Olsson, O., Blenckner, T. & Furness, R.W. 2008. Junk-food in marine ecosystems. Oikos, 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16501.x.Google Scholar
Patterson, D.L., Woehler, E.J., Croxall, J.P., Cooper, J., Poncet, S., Peter, H.-U., Hunter, S. & Fraser, W.R. 2008. Breeding distribution and population status of the northern giant petrel Macronectes halli and the southern giant petrel M. giganteus . Marine Ornithology, 36, 115124.Google Scholar
Petry, M.V., Valls, F.C.L., Petersen, E.D., Krüger, L., Piuco, R.D. & dos Santos, C.R. 2016. Breeding sites and population of seabirds on Admiralty Bay, King George Island, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 10.1007/s00300-015-1846-1.Google Scholar
Quintana, F., Punta, G., Copello, S. & Yorio, P. 2006. Population status and trends of southern giant petrels (Macronectes giganteus) breeding in North Patagonia, Argentina. Polar Biology, 10.1007/s00300-006-0159-9.Google Scholar
Reid, T.A. & Huin, N. 2008. Census of the southern giant petrel population of the Falkland Islands 2004/2005. Bird Conservation International, 10.1017/S0959270908000105.Google Scholar
Sander, M., Carneiro, A.P.B., Balbao, T.C., Bays, S.R., Costa, E.S., Mascarello, N.E., Oliva, T.D. & dos Santos, C.R. 2005. Status and trends of Antarctic seabirds at Admiralty Bay, King George Island. Polarforschung, 75, 145150.Google Scholar
Schulz, U.H., Krüger, L. & Petry, M.V. 2014. Southern giant petrel Macronectes giganteus nest attendance patterns under extreme weather conditions. Zoological Science, 10.2108/zs130135.Google Scholar
Yeh, Y.-M., Huang, H.-W., Dietrich, K.S. & Melvin, E. 2013. Estimates of seabird incidental catch by pelagic longline fisheries in the south Atlantic Ocean. Animal Conservation, 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00588.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 a. Non-breeding foraging area (hashed polygon) of southern giant petrels (SGPs) from Stinker Point, Elephant Island (star), off South America (from Krüger et al.2017). The Economic Exclusive Zones (EEZs) for each country are indicated by grey lines. b. Historical trends of fish landings (tons) from fisheries off the Falkland Islands, Argentina and Uruguay between 1980 and 2012. Data are loess mean trend ± standard deviation. c. The annual residuals of the historical annual catches (tons) for fisheries off South America between 1985 and 2011 and the number of SGP breeding pairs. The lines represent the linear mean trend ± standard deviation.

Figure 1

Table I Annual variability of fisheries catch (thousands of tons) off Patagonian waters by type (classified according to FISHTAT group) and number of breeding pairs of southern giant petrels at Stinker Point, Elephant Island.