Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:13:54.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eukarya biodiversity in the Thala Hills, East Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2021

Dzmitry A. Lukashanets*
Affiliation:
Klaipėda University, Marine Research Institute, Universiteto 17, 92294Klaipėda, Lithuania Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Powstańców Warszawy 55, 81-712, Sopot, Poland
Peter Convey
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, CambridgeCB3 0ET, UK University of Johannesburg, Department of Zoology, PO Box 524, Auckland Park2006, South Africa
Oleg I. Borodin
Affiliation:
National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, Akademicheskaya 27, 220072Minsk, Belarus
Vladislav Ye. Miamin
Affiliation:
National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, Akademicheskaya 27, 220072Minsk, Belarus Belarusian State University, Biology Faculty, Nezavisimosti Ave 4, 220030Minsk, Belarus
Yury H. Hihiniak
Affiliation:
National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, Akademicheskaya 27, 220072Minsk, Belarus
Alexey A. Gaydashov
Affiliation:
National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Republican Center for Polar Research, Komsomolskaya 16, 220030Minsk, Belarus
Aleksander P. Yatsyna
Affiliation:
Belarusian State University, Biology Faculty, Nezavisimosti Ave 4, 220030Minsk, Belarus National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Institute of Experimental Botany, Akademicheskaya 27, 220072Minsk, Belarus
Vasil V. Vezhnavets
Affiliation:
National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, Akademicheskaya 27, 220072Minsk, Belarus
Natallia N. Maysak
Affiliation:
National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, Akademicheskaya 27, 220072Minsk, Belarus
Tatyana V. Shendrik
Affiliation:
National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, Akademicheskaya 27, 220072Minsk, Belarus
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Knowledge of the biodiversity of the Thala Hills oasis (Enderby Land, East Antarctica) is very limited. Here, we integrate all information available since 1962, when the Russian ‘Molodyozhnaya’ station was established in the western part of the oasis. The published data on local eukaryote diversity (lichens, embryophytes, metazoans) include records of 90 species. Since 2008, Belarusian Antarctic Expedition researchers have worked in the eastern part of the oasis, accessible from the Belarusian station ‘Vechernyaya Mount'. This research revealed 95 species, including 44 species not recorded in the earlier published literature. The level of available information is uneven across major taxa. Lichens are the better-known group, with 51 species recorded in total, including 13 species recently recorded for the first time in the oasis. New records were also obtained for rotifers. Thala Hills biodiversity is consistent with wider patterns of Antarctic biogeography, with a high proportion of regionally endemic species (especially metazoans), the occurrence of both endemic and bipolar species of lichens and generally low numbers of cosmopolitan species (largely limited to aquatic rotifers, with the caveat that up-to-date taxonomic studies are required). The lack of data on marine macrobenthos, soil nematodes and terrestrial rotifers emphasizes the need for studies focusing on these groups.

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2021

Introduction

The Antarctic flora and fauna are well adapted to the continent's harsh conditions (Convey Reference Convey1996, Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Johnston, Murphy and Clarke2012). However, today they face increasing threats from both direct human impacts and climate change (Convey Reference Convey2010, Chown et al. Reference Chown, Lee, Hughes, Barnes, Barrett and Bergstrom2012, Convey & Peck Reference Convey and Peck2019). Limited to typically small and often extremely isolated areas of ice-free land (oases), the Antarctic terrestrial biota is typified by high levels of regional endemism, surviving through the multiple and extensive glacial cycles of the Miocene, Pliocene and Pleistocene (Convey & Stevens Reference Convey and Stevens2007, Convey et al. Reference Convey, Gibson, Hillenbrand, Hodgson, Pugh, Smellie and Stevens2008, Reference Convey, Biersma, Casanova-Katny, Maturana, Oliva and Ruiz-Fernández2020, Fraser et al. Reference Fraser, Nikula, Ruzzante and Waters2012). Even today, many of the isolated ice-free oases across Antarctica have yet to receive even basic surveys of their terrestrial biodiversity (Convey Reference Convey2010, Convey et al. Reference Convey, Chown, Clarke, Barnes, Cummings and Ducklow2014).

Thala Hills is a coastal oasis located in Enderby Land, East Antarctica. Although there is a history of research in the area, this has focused on geological, geocryological and pedological studies (Dolgikh et al. Reference Dolgikh, Mergelov, Abramov, Lupachev, Goryachkin and Bockheim2015), and very little is known of its terrestrial biology and diversity. Most published studies are in the Russian-language literature, describing work that was carried out between the 1960s and the 1990s, and they are not widely accessible. The area of study within the oasis was also restricted in this period, mostly in the immediate vicinity of the Russian ‘Molodyozhnaya’ ('Youth') station in the western part of the oasis.

Since 2008, members of the Belarus Antarctic Expedition (BAE) have conducted multidisciplinary studies in the eastern part of the Thala Hills oasis during each summer season in the vicinity of the Belarus station ‘Vechernyaya Mount’ ('Evening Mount'). One of the primary goals of these studies has been to assess terrestrial (including freshwater) biodiversity, along with aspects of marine coastal diversity, in this poorly studied region, and to provide a baseline against which to assess any future evidence of human impacts and the consequences of global and regional environmental change.

In this study, we present the most thorough overview of the biodiversity of the Thala Hills oasis yet achieved. The information presented focuses on the Eukarya and is based on both the available literature and our recent surveys and collections. These data allow for an initial assessment of native terrestrial biodiversity of the Thala Hills oasis, and they are discussed in the wider context of Antarctic terrestrial biogeography.

Materials and methods

Study area

The Thala Hills oasis was first mapped in 1960 using aerial photography taken in 1956–1958 under the auspices of the Antarctic Names Committee of Australia. A more detailed map was completed in 1962 by Russian (Soviet Union) surveyors when Molodyozhnaya station was constructed. This low-lying coastal oasis is typical of such habitats in East Antarctica (Fig. 1). It is surrounded by glacial formations of different types. Although coastal, the nearshore area is normally covered with sea ice. The relief is rocky and undulating, reaching a maximum altitude of ~260 m above sea level (a.s.l.). Numerous riegels and depressions characterize the ground surface, indicating the influence of very strong geomorphological and periglacial processes. The main rock types are granitoids, primarily charnockites (including enderbites) (Simonov Reference Simonov1971).

Fig. 1. Characteristic landscapes of the eastern part of the Thala Hills oasis (photographs by Dzmitry A. Lukashanets).

The climate is harsh even in comparison with other East Antarctic oases (MacNamara Reference MacNamara1969, Simonov Reference Simonov1971, Dolgikh et al. Reference Dolgikh, Mergelov, Abramov, Lupachev, Goryachkin and Bockheim2015). Blizzards are experienced on ~190 days each year (cf. 88 days at Schirmacher Oasis and 70 days at Bunger Hills). The average wind speed is ~10.2 m s-1. Katabatic winds occur frequently, along with frequent cyclone intrusion. Maximum solar irradiance is high, with total irradiance of ~100.6 kcal cm-2, ground-absorbed irradiance of 70.5 kcal cm-2 (four times greater than that of ice cover) and the irradiance balance being 30.5 kcal cm-2. The average annual air temperature is -11.1°C, with the warmest monthly mean being -1.0°C in January and the coldest being -18.8°C in August. The instantaneous temperature of the ground surface ranges from -38°C in winter to +36°C in summer, with an annual average of -9.3°C. Annual precipitation is 484 mm water equivalent.

Water bodies are present in the inter-ridge depressions and several larger lakes are present in the western part of the oasis, including Lakes Glubokoe, Lagernoe and Ovalnoe. These have surface areas of 280, 53 and 40 × 103 m2 and average depths of 11.6, 3.3 and 1.0 m, respectively (Simonov Reference Simonov1971).

Data collection

To collate all available information relating to Thala Hills biodiversity, the available literature was carefully examined. We referred to 21 sources that contain information on biodiversity records from the western and eastern parts of the Thala Hills oasis specifically, as well several atlases with information on species distribution (mainly for marine fauna) and multiple works addressing overall East Antarctic diversity.

The new studies reported here were conducted in the eastern part of the Thala Hills oasis (Enderby Land, East Antarctica) near the Belarusian station ‘Vechernyaya Mountain', ~12 km from Molodyozhnaya station (Fig. 2). Studies took place during the II, III, V, VI, VIII, IX and XI BAE, in the summer periods between 2008–2009 and 2018–2019.

Fig. 2. Study area. a. The location of the Thala Hills oasis on the coast of East Antarctica. b. Satellite image of the eastern part of the Thala Hills oasis (Vechernyaya Mount). BAS = Belarus Antarctic Station.

Marine biota were surveyed at Lazurnaya Bay in the Cosmonaut Sea. Marine macrobenthos were collected using several approaches, including benthic traps and grabs, direct collection by divers and using remotely operated underwater vehicles. The latter were also used to obtain video and photographic records. Fish were collected using standard line-and-hook collection methods following bioethical and ecological standards. Marine mammals and birds were observed using binoculars from the maximum possible distance. On land, lichens and mosses were collected by hand from rocks and the soil surface. Terrestrial invertebrates were extracted from some of these samples. Samples of freshwater zooplankton were collected by means of standard hydrobiological procedures (Andrews Reference Andrews1972, Schwoerbel Reference Schwoerbel1972) using plankton nets (mesh size 45 or 20 μm). Both qualitative and quantitative plankton samples were taken, the latter filtering 50, 150, 200 or 400 l of water and expressing abundances as number of individuals per 100 l. Plankton samples were fixed using 4% formalin solution. The locations of all sample sites are illustrated in Fig. 3, and summary information about the sampled locations and habitats (freshwater bodies, sites of vegetation, etc.) is given in Supplemental Tables S1–S4.

Fig. 3. Sampling and observing sites in the area of the Belarus Antarctic Station (BAS) ‘Vechernyaya Mount’ in the eastern part of the Thala Hills oasis. a. Aquatic habitats: freshwater and marine (for details, see Supplemental Table S1). b. Vegetation sampling sites (for details, see Supplemental Table S2). c. Terrestrial substrates sampled for micrometazoans (for details, see Supplemental Table S3). d. Birds and mammals (for details, see Supplemental Table S4).

All sampling and observations strictly followed the guidance of Annex II to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (Conservation of Antarctic Fauna and Flora 2009) and the guidelines of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR 2018), ensuring the minimum possible impact on the environment.

Sample processing

Initial sample processing took place at the Belarus Antarctic station, with subsequent studies on return of preserved material to Belarus. Processing techniques were appropriate to each of the groups examined. Microscopic metazoans (e.g. zooplankton, terrestrial invertebrates, etc.) were examined using Petri dishes or counting chambers under dissection and light microscopy. Appropriate reagents were used to dissolve the soft parts of rotifer individuals in order to make the details of sclerotized jaws visible, with morphometric analyses performed as described by Iakovenko et al. (Reference Iakovenko, Kašparová, Plewka and Janko2013). Micrographs of rotifers, parasitic nematodes and acanthocephalans were obtained using AxioCAM and NIKON E200 cameras with AxioVision and NIS Elements BR analysis 5.10.00, respectively. To isolate fish parasites, we followed procedures described by Buchmann (Reference Buchmann2007). For different taxonomic groups, we relied on appropriate taxonomic literature as follows. Lichens: Øvstedal & Smith (Reference Øvstedal and Smith2001), Speilmann & Pereira (Reference Speilmann and Pereira2012); rotifers: Donner (Reference Donner1965), Kutikova (Reference Kutikova1970, Reference Kutikova2005), Dartnall & Hollowday (Reference Dartnall and Hollowday1985), Nogrady et al. (Reference Nogrady, Poirrot and Segers1995), De Smet & Pourriot (Reference De Smet and Pourriot1997), Iakovenko et al. (Reference Iakovenko, Smykla, Convey, Kašparová, Kozeretska and Trokhymets2015); tardigrades: Ramazzotti & Maucci (Reference Ramazzotti and Maucci1983), Pilato & Binda (Reference Pilato and Binda2010), Bingemer & Hohberg (Reference Bingemer and Hohberg2017); mites: Strandtmann (Reference Strandtmann1967); springtails: Wise (Reference Wise1971), Greenslade (Reference Greenslade2018a); marine macrobenthos: Brueggeman (Reference Brueggeman1998), Hibbert & Moore (Reference Hibbert and Moore2009), Rauschert & Arntz (Reference Rauschert and Arntz2015), Sirenko et al. (Reference Sirenko, Gagaev and Smirnov2017); fish: Fischer (Reference Fischer1985), Gon (Reference Gon, Gon and Heemstra1990), McMillan et al. (Reference McMillan, Marriott, Hanchet, Fenaughty, Mackay, Sui and Wei2014).

Data analysis and presentation

Following identification to the lowest taxonomic level practicable, for each taxon we assessed whether it had previously been recorded 1) in Antarctica generally (including Maritime Antarctic and sub-Antarctic regions, 2) in Continental Antarctica (from Dronning Maud Land to the Ross Sea) or 3) in the Thala Hills region specifically. The relatively limited spatially explicit data available in the literature from the latter region, in particular from the marine environment, meant that assessment of 3) was sometimes problematic (commonly the lack of precise location information meant that we considered taxa previously recorded from the ‘Cosmonaut Sea’ to be potentially present in the Thala Hills area). We extracted known distributional information primarily from the Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean (De Broyer et al. Reference De Broyer, Koubbi, Griffiths, Raymond and Van de Putte2014) and the published literature, as well as open-access databases (Australian Antarctic Data Center (AADC n.d.), AlgaeBase, BirdLife International, Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and The World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS)).

Results

Our search of the available literature and open-access data sources identified that the previously recorded eukaryotic terrestrial and marine biodiversity of the Thala Hills area included 90 species. In the new surveys reported in the current study, a total of 95 species were found. However, only 51 of these species (54%) were previously recorded from this area. A full list of all species that have now been reported from the Thala Hills oasis is given in Table I.

Table I. Checklist of the biota recorded from the Thala Hills oasis, with notes on wider distribution and biogeography.

Dark grey boxes indicate previous records; light grey boxes indicate no previous record.

Ant = Antarctica (including the Maritime Antarctic and sub-Antarctic islands); BP = bipolar distribution; Cosm = cosmopolitan; EA = East (Continental) Antarctica; End = endemic to Antarctica (including Continental Antarctica, the Maritime Antarctic and the sub-Antarctic islands); FW = freshwater; Mar = marine; SH = Southern Hemisphere; Ter = terrestrial; TH = Thala Hills (within the Cosmonaut Sea coastal area).

Voucher specimens are stored in the collections of the Scientific and Practical Center of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Bioresources (SPC for Bioresources), Minsk, Belarus. Lichen specimens are also stored in the lichen herbarium (MSK-L) at the V.F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (IEB), Minsk, Belarus. All data on specimens collected during the 2018/2019 season are available at http://boldsystems.org/index.php/MAS_Management_DataConsole?codes=GDBAE (the project in Barcode of Life Data System ‘GDBAE', Genetic Diversity of East Antarctica). Supplemental Table S5 contains general information on voucher specimens. Photographs and video records confirming other records of species (without voucher specimens) are also available at the SPC for Bioresources.

Below, we provide brief overviews of the main groups of Eukarya recorded from the oasis.

Terrestrial diversity

Lichens

The only published synthesis of lichen diversity from Thala Hills is that of Andreev (Reference Andreev2013), which includes some recently obtained data (2010–2011) and a collation of earlier fragmentary reports (Golubkova et al. Reference Golubkova, Savich and Simonov1969, Andreev Reference Andreev1990). These reports document material from the vicinity of Molodyozhnaya station in the western part of the oasis and a small number of other locations (Cape Kosisty and the McMahon Islands). A total of 38 species were reported, representing mostly crustose growth forms and saxicolous species. No closed lichen communities were present, and lichens were present only in very small clusters or as individual thalli, mostly in cryptic locations. Candelariella flava, Rinodina olivaceobrunnea, Amandinea punctata, Xanthoria mawsonii and Flavoplaca citrina were the dominant lichens in moss-algae-lichen associations growing on gravel substrata in sheltered locations around rocks and hollows and in rock crevices. The species Buellia frigida, Umbilicaria decussata, Umbilicaria aprina and Pseudephebe minuscula were present in moist sites such as lotic waterbeds and near the edges of melting snow patches and glacier edges. Small patches of P. minuscula and Lecidea spp. were also infrequently present on more exposed rock surfaces on the hills of the western part of the oasis.

Collections in the Vechernyaya Mountain locality in the eastern part of the oasis initiated in 2009 now allow for a more complete description of the lichen diversity of Thala Hills. The lichen flora of this part of the oasis consists of 32 species, and one species of lichenicolous fungus was also recorded (Table I). Twenty of the 33 species are present in both the western and eastern parts of the oasis, and the remaining 13 species were newly recorded only from the eastern part. In the eastern part of the oasis, lichens were recorded at altitudes of 15–256 m a.s.l., and again no continuous cover was present. Most species (25; 75.8%) were saxicolous. Ten species were epiphytic on mosses and five were terricolous (some species can grow on more than one substratum). The most frequent growth forms were crustose (18 species) and foliose (10 species). These features are closely similar to those of the lichen community of the western part of the oasis (Andreev Reference Andreev2013).

The most abundant species were Buellia frigida, Physcia caesia, Xanthoria elegans, Umbilicaria aprina, Umbilicaria decussata and Usnea sphacelata. Moderately common species included Candelariella flava, Lecanora polytropa, Polyozosia expectans and Pseudephebe minusculа. Species only occurring rarely in the oasis included Acarospora gwynnii, Lecidea cancriformis, Pleopsidium chlorophanum, Pseudophebe pubescens, Rhizocarpon adarense, R. flavum, Xanthoria candelaria, amongst others. There was low similarity (as indicated by the Sørensen-Dice coefficient) between lichen species diversity in the vicinity of Vechernyaya Mountain and in the western part of Thala Hills (Table II).

Table II. Comparison of lichen assemblages between Vechernyaya Mount, eastern Thala Hills, obtained in recent surveys, and Molodyozhnaya, western Thala Hills (extracted from Andreev Reference Andreev2013).

a The sum is more than 100% because some species occurred on more than one substratum.

Mosses. The bryophyte flora included nine species of moss, with no other groups of embryophytes represented. According to brief summaries (Savicz-Lyubitskaya & Smirnova 1972, Kurbatova et al. Reference Kurbatova, Andreev and Dolgikh2014), in the western part of the oasis only Bryum pseudotriquetrum and Ceratodon purpureus are common, with other species (B. archangelicum, Hennediella heimii, Orthogrimmia sessitana, Schistidium antarctici and Coscinodon lawianus) being rare.

In the eastern part of the oasis, B. pseudotriquetrum and C. purpureus are again the most common species, often growing together. Relatively large carpets of B. pseudotriquetrum are present (up to 60 m2), especially in areas with ornithogenic influence from the local Adélie penguin colony. Two other newly recorded species had more limited occurrence as isolated clumps: B. argenteum and Funaria hygrometrica (Table I), the latter being limited to moist places.

Terrestrial and freshwater micro-invertebrates

Four species of planktonic rotifer have previously been recorded in the western part of the Thala Hills oasis (Opaliński Reference Opaliński1972, Kutikova Reference Kutikova1991, Sharov et al. Reference Sharov, Berezina and Tolstikov2015). Sampling of 50 water bodies in the eastern part of the oasis in the current study revealed five bdelloid (Bdelloidea) and nine monogonont (Monogononta) species (Table I). Other than Lepadella patella and Keratella cochlearis, all freshwater rotifer species identified from the samples examined in this study are new records for the oasis. Most of the species were characterized by low occurrence frequency, with only bdelloids (mostly unidentified) present in most water bodies (Table III). Six further bdelloid species, new for the oasis, were extracted from terrestrial samples (moss associations, algal mats).

Table III. Rotifers obtained from freshwater lakes (n = 18) and temporary ponds (n = 27) in the Thala Hills oasis.

n/d = not determined.

Three tardigrade species were identified in the current study from moss and algal samples - Milnesium tardigradum, Acutuncus antarcticus and Echiniscus kerguelensis - confirming their presence in the oasis. Eleven other freshwater and terrestrial species have been reported in previous studies in the western (Utsugi & Ohyama Reference Utsugi and Ohyama1991) and eastern parts of the oasis (Dastych Reference Dastych1984) (Table I).

Terrestrial micro-arthropods

The described micro-arthropod diversity of the Thala Hills oasis is very low, and samples examined in the current study did not include specimens of the one springtail (Collembola) recorded, previously known as Friesea grisea (Wise Reference Wise1971). The taxonomy of Antarctic members of this genus has recently been extensively revised (Greenslade Reference Greenslade2018a, Carapelli et al. Reference Carapelli, Cucini, Fanciulli, Frati, Convey and Nardi2020a, Reference Carapelli, Greenslade, Nardi, Leo, Convey, Frati and Fanciulli2020b), and material from Thala Hills has been re-described as the new and oasis-endemic species F. eureka (Greenslade Reference Greenslade2018b). The prostigmatid mite Stereotydeus meyeri was sometimes commonly associated with moss vegetation and lichens (Strandtmann Reference Strandtmann1967).

Marine diversity

Marine invertebrates

Very limited published information is available documenting marine benthos diversity in the Thala Hills region, with few species recorded (Gruzov & Pushkin Reference Gruzov and Pushkin1973). Our recent observations of benthos close to the shoreline of Lazurnaya Bay in the eastern part of Thala Hills revealed eight echinoderm species (the starfish Cuenotaster involutus and Odontaster validus, the sea urchin Sterechinus neumayeri and five species of brittle stars), two mollusc species, three polychaete worms and a number of other species (anthozoans and sponges) (Table I). Most have previously been recorded in the Cosmonaut Sea, while the polychaetes appear to be the first formal records from the area.

All three parasitic acanthocephalan species and three of the four parasitic nematodes have been recorded for the first time in the recent sampling studies. All species were found in fish individuals (Trematomus spp.), with the parasite contamination levels being extremely high (Table IV). The most frequently encountered in rank order were Contracaecum osculatum larvae followed by C. radiatum larvae, Ascarophis nototheniae adults, the three acanthocephalan species and Pseudoterranova decipiens larvae.

Table IV. Parasites associated with Trematomus spp. sampled in the Cosmonaut Sea (n fish = 32; n parasites = 1512).

AI = abundance index (average number of parasite individuals per fish examined); DI = dominance index (relative abundance of each species); EI = proportion of contaminated fishes; IAI = confidence interval of AI; IEI = confidence interval of EI; II = intensity of invasion (number of parasite individuals per individual contaminated fish).

Fish, birds and mammals

Fish species previously recorded close to the Thala Hills coastline include Trematomus bernacchii, T. newnesi, T. nicolai, T. borchgrevinki and Gymnodraco acuticeps, with new records of T. hansoni and T. pennellii obtained in our recent surveys (Table I). Similarly, the only mammal (Leptonychotes weddellii) and most marine birds have previously been noted in the area, with the exception of Aptenodytes forsteri, for which we provide the first formal record. Pygoscelis adeliae, Stercorarius maccormicki and Oceanites oceanicus breed within the oasis.

Discussion

Thala Hills biodiversity

Lichens are well known for their high levels of environmental stress tolerance (Singh et al. Reference Singh, Olech, Cannone and Convey2015) and they form the main component of continental Antarctic vegetation (Castello & Nimis Reference Castello, Nimis, Battaglia, Valencia and Walton1997, Øvstedal & Smith Reference Øvstedal and Smith2001, Nayaka & Upreti Reference Nayaka and Upreti2005, Peat et al. Reference Peat, Clarke and Convey2007). The lichen diversity of Thala Hills is similar to that of Bunger Hills and Schirmacher Oasis, the Prince Charles Mountains and other continental Antarctic locations (Andreev Reference Andreev2013). Some of the species present (Acarospora gwynnii, Buellia frigida, Candelariella flava, Rinodina olivaceobrunnea, Pseudephebe minusculа) are widespread throughout the Antarctic continent (Øvstedal & Smith Reference Øvstedal and Smith2001). The data obtained in the current study have increased the known lichen species diversity of the Thala Hills oasis by almost 25%, from 38 to 51 species (Fig. 4). Most of the new species records are of species known from elsewhere in Continental Antarctica, although two have not previously been recorded in from this region (Filson Reference Filson1975, Smith Reference Smith1988, Kanda & Inoue Reference Kanda and Inoue1994, Castello & Nimis Reference Castello and Nimis1995, Pandey & Upreti Reference Pandey and Upreti2000, Nayaka & Upreti Reference Nayaka and Upreti2005, Singh et al. Reference Singh, Nayaka and Upreti2007, Reference Singh, Olech, Cannone and Convey2015, Rai et al. Reference Rai, Khare, Nayaka, Upreti and Gupta2011, Smykla et al. Reference Smykla, Krzewicka, Wilk, Emslie and Sliwa2011, Singh & Nayaka Reference Singh and Nayaka2017). The two new records are of Porpidia crustulata, a cosmopolitan species known from the sub-Antarctic and Maritime Antarctic (AADC n.d., Singh et al. Reference Singh, Olech, Cannone and Convey2015) and Leptogium puberulum, which was previously known only from the Maritime Antarctic (AADC n.d.). Eleven species known from elsewhere in the Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Region of East Antarctica are recorded specifically from Thala Hills for the first time: Arthonia molendoi, Pleopsidium chlorophanum, Buellia soredians, Lecanora polytropa, Lecidea lapicida, Lecidella stigmatea, Pseudephebe pubescens, Rhizocarpon adarense, R. flavum, Umbilicaria africana and Polycauliona candelaria.

Fig. 4. All species records (lichens, embryophytes, metazoans) available from the Thala Hills oasis (literature data plus current study). Marine In = marine invertebrates; Marine LA = marine large animals (fish, seals, birds); Ter FW MI = terrestrial and freshwater micro-invertebrates; Ter MA = terrestrial micro-arthropods.

The low similarity between lichen species diversity in the eastern and western parts of Thala Hills (Table II) is perhaps surprising as the ecological structure of these assemblages (in terms of growth form and growth substrate) as well as the wider biogeography of the component species are closely similar. However, at small scales, considerable patchiness is characteristic of many elements of Antarctic terrestrial diversity, even though at larger scale many factors that can strongly influence diversity are more predictable, such as overall climate, pedology and underlying geology and other environmental factors (Usher & Booth Reference Usher and Booth1984, Green et al. Reference Green, Sancho, Türk, Seppelt and Hohh2011, Convey et al. Reference Convey, Chown, Clarke, Barnes, Cummings and Ducklow2014, Reference Convey, Coulson, Worland and Sjöblom2018).

Of the nine moss species recorded, two are new for Thala Hills. The presence of a solitary clump of Bryum argenteum in our recent surveys (coll. O. Borodin) has already been reported (Kurbatova et al. Reference Kurbatova, Andreev and Dolgikh2014). This species is known from other locations in Continental Antarctica (Ochyra & Singh Reference Ochyra and Singh2008, Ochyra et al. Reference Ochyra, Smith and Bendarek-Ochyra2008b). However, the record of Funaria hygrometrica is striking, as the species is otherwise known in Antarctica only from sub-Antarctic South Georgia (Ochyra et al. Reference Ochyra, Smith and Bendarek-Ochyra2008b) and a single record (presumed introduced) from one site in Wilkes Land in Continental Antarctica (Ochyra et al. Reference Ochyra, Bernadek-Ochyra and Smith2008a). The species has previously been recorded from actively geothermally heated ground on Deception Island (South Shetland Islands) as a colonist soon after eruptions in 1967/1968 (Collins Reference Collins1969). However, it only persisted at that location as long as the geothermal activity continued, then rapidly died out (Smith Reference Smith1984, Reference Smith2005), which suggests that the species does not have appropriate physiological abilities to support its survival in a Continental Antarctic location such as Thala Hills. The material identified here (and also reported from Wilkes Land) as F. hygrometrica may, therefore, require further taxonomic assessment.

Rotifer diversity has previously received very little attention in Thala Hills. Of the freshwater species listed in Table III, only Lepadella patella and Keratella cochlearis have previously been recorded from the oasis specifically, although most of the other species are recorded from other regions of Continental Antarctica (Chatey et al. Reference Chatey, Parker, Simmons, Yongue and Brunt1981, Everitt Reference Everitt1981, Suren Reference Suren1990, Kutikova Reference Kutikova1991, Dartnall Reference Dartnall1995a, Reference Dartnall2000, Webster-Brown et al. Reference Webster-Brown, Gall, Gibson, Wood and Hawes2010, Hansson et al. Reference Hansson, Hylander, Dartnall, Lidström and Svensson2012). Exceptions include Rhinoglena frontalis, which is known from sub-Antarctic Heard Island, the Kerguelen archipelago and Macquarie Island (Dartnall Reference Dartnall1993, Reference Dartnall1995b, De Smet Reference De Smet2001, Dartnall et al. Reference Dartnall, Hollwedel and de Paggi2005), Pleuretra lineata known from the Maritime Antarctic (Iakovenko et al. Reference Iakovenko, Smykla, Convey, Kašparová, Kozeretska and Trokhymets2015) and Encentrum saundersiae and Keratella tecta, which are new Antarctic records. There are no previous records of rotifers from terrestrial habitats at Thala Hills. Four of the species identified here are known from other parts of Continental Antarctica: Adineta editae, A. vaga vaga, A. steineri and Philodina gregaria (Sohlenius et al. Reference Sohlenius, Boström and Hirschfelder1995, Sohlenius & Boström Reference Sohlenius and Boström2005, Webster-Brown et al. Reference Webster-Brown, Gall, Gibson, Wood and Hawes2010, Iakovenko et al. Reference Iakovenko, Smykla, Convey, Kašparová, Kozeretska and Trokhymets2015). Macrotrachela kallosoma is a new record from Continental Antarctica, although it has been recorded from the Falkland Islands in the South Atlantic (Kutikova Reference Kutikova1991). The subspecies A. vaga minor has not previously been recorded from Antarctica or the sub-Antarctic.

In the marine environment, all fish species identified excluding Trematomus hansonii and Trematomus pennellii have been recorded previously from the Thala Hills shoreline or the wider Cosmonaut Sea (Jakubowski Reference Jakubowski1970, Reference Jakubowski1975, Rakusa-Suszczewski Reference Rakusa-Suszczewski1972a, Jakubowski & Rembiszewski Reference Jakubowski and Rembiszewski1974, Dewitt et al. Reference Dewitt, Heemstra, Gon, Gon and Heemstra1990).

Acanthocephalans have not been studied in the region of the Cosmonaut Sea. While all three parasitic acanthocephalan species are new records for the oasis, they have been noted previously from Antarctic waters, and members of the genus Metacanthocephalus have been noted widely around Continental Antarctica (Rocka Reference Rocka2006).

All marine nematode species recorded here are widely distributed around Antarctica and also sub-Antarctic South Georgia (Rocka Reference Rocka2006). However, only Contracaecum radiatum has explicitly been recorded from the Cosmonaut Sea (WoRMS 2021b). All of our records of Echinodermata, Mollusca and several other taxa confirm previous reports from the Cosmonaut Sea, while Odontaster validus and Sterechinus neumayeri have explicitly been reported from the coastal zone near Thala Hills (Gruzov & Pushkin Reference Gruzov and Pushkin1973). New species records for the region are reported for Polychaeta. Overall, the macrobenthos communities present along the coast of Thala Hills show no distinct differences from the well-described communities of Prydz Bay (Commonwealth Sea, East Antarctica) (Saucede et al. Reference Saucede, Pierrat, David, Broyer, Koubbi, Griffiths, Raymond, Udekem d'Acoz, Van de Putte and A.P.2014, Sirenko et al. Reference Sirenko, Gagaev and Smirnov2017). Although no studies of the birds and mammals present around Thala Hills are available, all species present are well known from the wider region of East Antarctica (Del Hoyo et al. Reference Del Hoyo, Elliot and Sargatal1992, Ropert-Coudert et al. Reference Ropert-Coudert, Hindell, Phillips, Charrassin, Trudelle, Raymond, De Broyer, Koubbi, Griffiths, Raymond, Udekem d'Acoz and Van de Putte2014).

Biogeographical patterns

The Thala Hills terrestrial biota includes a high proportion of endemic species (Fig. 5), a feature that is being increasingly strongly recognized across Antarctica (Pugh & Convey Reference Pugh and Convey2008, Convey et al. Reference Convey, Biersma, Casanova-Katny, Maturana, Oliva and Ruiz-Fernández2020). Most of the lichens present in Thala Hills are widely represented in polar vegetation and are either Antarctic endemics or have bipolar distributions. However, several species are cosmopolitan (e.g. Amandinea punctata, Flavoplaca citrina, Physcia caesia, Lecanora polytropa, Lecidea lapicida, Porpidia crustulata, Rhizocarpon geographicum) (Singh et al. Reference Singh, Olech, Cannone and Convey2015), with a small number having Southern Hemisphere distributions, including Acarospora gwynnii, Umbilicaria africana, Usnea antarctica, Stereocaulon antarcticum (Singh et al. Reference Singh, Olech, Cannone and Convey2015), Rhizocarpon adarense (Øvstedal & Smith Reference Øvstedal and Smith2001, McCarthy & Elix Reference McCarthy and Elis2014). Moss diversity, while being lower overall, had a slightly greater proportion of Antarctic endemic and bipolar species, along with the cosmopolitan Ceratodon purpureus, Bryum argenteum and B. archangelicum (Ochyra et al. Reference Ochyra, Smith and Bendarek-Ochyra2008b).

Fig. 5. Biogeographic analysis of all species (lichens, embryophytes, metazoans) known from the Thala Hills oasis. Marine In = marine invertebrates; Marine LA = marine large animals (fish, seals, birds); Ter FW MI = terrestrial and freshwater micro-invertebrates; Ter MA = terrestrial micro-arthropods.

The relatively high number of cosmopolitan species apparently characterizing the terrestrial and freshwater rotifer faunas of Thala Hills may be a reflection of the lack of modern taxonomic analyses, including the application of molecular approaches, applied to material from this region. Where such studies have been applied (e.g. Iakovenko et al. Reference Iakovenko, Smykla, Convey, Kašparová, Kozeretska and Trokhymets2015), the general conclusion is that Antarctic representatives are clearly distinct from other relatives globally, as is the case in other groups of terrestrial fauna (reviewed by Convey et al. Reference Convey, Biersma, Casanova-Katny, Maturana, Oliva and Ruiz-Fernández2020). There is a similar lack of up-to-date taxonomic reconsideration of tardigrades across much of Antarctica. Few tardigrades were directly recorded in the current study, with the majority of species records only being available in older literature. Of those records, five species are currently considered to be cosmopolitan and seven to be Antarctic endemics. The species Echiniscus kerguelensis and Hebesuncus conjungens currently have bipolar distributions. Endemic species recorded include Acutuncus antarcticus, considered to be one of the most widely distributed tardigrades in Antarctica (Tsujimoto et al. Reference Tsujimoto, McInnes, Convey and Imura2014). However, the latest research indicates that even this apparently well-known species most likely represents a species group with geographically distinct intra-Antarctic distributions, further highlighting the need for up-to-date taxonomic re-analyses (Short Reference Short2021). Diphascon langhovdense is also an Antarctic endemic, along with five other species originally described from this study area but not apparently subjected to subsequent study.

In the marine communities assessed here, most recorded species are typical of and only known from Antarctic and sub-Antarctic waters (Danis et al. Reference Danis, Griffths, Jangoux, Broyer, Koubbi, Griffiths, Raymond, Udekem d'Acoz, Van de Putte and A.P.2014, Saucede et al. Reference Saucede, Pierrat, David, Broyer, Koubbi, Griffiths, Raymond, Udekem d'Acoz, Van de Putte and A.P.2014, Sirenko et al. Reference Sirenko, Gagaev and Smirnov2017, Stöhr et al. Reference Stöhr, O'Hara and Thuy2020). However, the benthic Odontaster validus and Serpula narconensis have been reported from the southern Pacific and south-west Atlantic Oceans (Blom & Moriarty Reference Blom and Moriarty2021, Mah Reference Mah2021, Orrell Reference Orrell2021, Read & Fauchald Reference Read and Fauchald2021) and Perkinsiana magalhaensis from South America (Häussermann & Försterra Reference Häussermann and Försterra2009, Bigatti Reference Bigatti2015). All recorded fish species are widely distributed in the Southern Ocean (Andriyashev Reference Andriashev, Pawloswski and Andriashev1964, Dewitt et al. Reference Dewitt, Heemstra, Gon, Gon and Heemstra1990, Gon Reference Gon, Gon and Heemstra1990, Duhamel et al. Reference Duhamel, Hulley, Causse, Koubbi, Vacchi, Belchier, Broyer, Koubbi, Griffiths, Raymond, Udekem d'Acoz, Van de Putte and A.P.2014). The fish parasites, acanthocephalans and nematode worms show both restricted and globally widespread distributions (Rocka Reference Rocka2006, Bezerra et al. Reference Bezerra, Eisendle, Hodda, Holovachov and Leduc2021a, Reference Bezerra, Eisendle, Hodda, Holovachov and Leduc2021b, WoRMS 2021a, 2021b).

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Igor S. Smirnov, Boris I. Sirenko, Sergey Yu. Gagaev and Alexey V. Neelov from the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, for their help in identifying marine benthos and fish. We thank all members of the Belarus Antarctic Expeditions for their assistance in sampling and return of material to Belarus, as well as the officers and crew of the Russian scientific vessels for logistic support in the transfer of samples. We acknowledge Alex Borisenko and Maria Kuzmina from Center of Biodiversity Genomics (Guelph, Canada) for their promotion in creating the reference library in Barcode of Life Data System. In addition, we thank two anonymous reviews for their helpful comments.

Author contributions

DL combined all literature data as well as field data, including those collected by himself (2018–19), and prepared the text, figures and supplemental materials. PC made significant contributions in preparing the text and interpreting the data. OB, VM and YH have been the main implementers of the surveys on site throughout the BAEs (2008–2018). AG, the chief of the expedition, facilitated the logistic and transport support for sampling during all seasons. Several authors identified species in specific taxonomic groups: VV and NM - rotifers (with DL in case of bdelloids); AY - lichens; and TS - fish parasites.

Financial support

This study was conducted in the framework of the Belarus National Antarctic Program's projects ‘Monitoring of the Polar Regions of the Earth and Ensuring the Activities of Arctic and Antarctic Expeditions’ (2007–2015) and ‘Monitoring of Polar Regions of the Earth, Creation of the Belarusian Antarctic Station and Support of the activities of Polar Expeditions’ (2016–2020). This paper also contributes to the SCAR ‘State of the Antarctic Ecosystem’ programme. Peter Convey is supported by NERC core funding to the British Antarctic Survey's ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation’ Team.

Supplemental material

Five supplemental tables will be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102021000328.

References

Andreev, M.P. 1990. Lichainiki pribrezhnych oazisov Vostochnoj Antarktidy [Lichens of the coastal oases in East Antarctica]. Novitates Systematicae Plantarum Non Vascularum, 27, 9395.Google Scholar
Andreev, M.P. 2013. Lichainiki oazisa Molodyozhnyi i prilegajushchih territorij (Zemlya Enderbi) [Lichens of the oasis Molodyozhnyi and adjacent areas (Enderby Land)]. Novitates Systematicae Plantarum Non Vascularum, 47, 167178.Google Scholar
Andrews, W.A. ed. 1972. A guide to the study of freshwater ecology. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall, 182 pp.Google Scholar
Andriashev, A.P. 1964. Obshchiy obzor fauny ryb Antarktiki [A general review of the Antarctica fish fauna]. In Pawloswski, Ye.N. & Andriashev, A.P. eds. Rezultaty biologicheskih issledovaniy Sovetskoy Antarkticheskoy Ekspeditsii [Results of the biological studies of the Soviet Antarctic Expedition] 1955–1958 Part 2. Moscow-Leningrad: NAS USSR, 355386.Google Scholar
Bezerra, T.N., Eisendle, U., Hodda, M., Holovachov, O., Leduc, D., et al. 2021a. Nemys: World Database of Nematodes. Ascarophis nototheniae Johnston & Mawson, 1945. Available through World Register of Marine Species at https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=527928 on 2021-03-29.Google Scholar
Bezerra, T.N., Eisendle, U., Hodda, M., Holovachov, O., Leduc, D., et al. 2021b. Nemys: World Database of Nematodes. Pseudoterranova decipiens (Krabbe, 1878) Gibson, 1983. Available through World Register of Marine Species at https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=123078 on 2021-03-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigatti, G. 2015. Marine Invertebrate from Argentina, Uruguay and Chile. v1.4. ArOBIS Centro Nacional Patagónico. Dataset/Occurrence. Available at http://arobis.cenpat-conicet.gob.ar:8081/resource?r=arobis-marineinvertebrate&v=1.4; https://doi.org/10.15468/xntwha accessed via GBIF.org on 29 March 2021; https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1328193767.Google Scholar
Bingemer, J. & Hohberg, K. 2017. An illustrated identification key to the Eutardigrade species (Tardigrada, Eutardigrada) presently known from European soils. Soil Organisms, 89, 127149.Google Scholar
Blom, W. & Moriarty, A. 2021. Auckland Museum NZ Marine Collection. Version 1.50. Auckland War Memorial Museum. Occurrence dataset. Available at https://doi.org/10.15468/plyefd accessed via GBIF.org on 29 March 2021.Google Scholar
Brueggeman, P. 1998. Underwater field guide to Ross Island and McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. San Diego, CA: UC San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Library.Google Scholar
Buchmann, K. 2007. An introduction to fish parasitological methods: classical and molecular techniques. Frederiksberg: Biofolia, 130 pp.Google Scholar
Carapelli, A., Cucini, C., Fanciulli, P.P., Frati, F., Convey, P. & Nardi, F. 2020a. Molecular comparison among three Antarctic endemic springtail species and description of the mitochondrial genome of Friesea gretae (Hexapoda, Collembola). Diversity, 12, 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carapelli, A., Greenslade, P., Nardi, F., Leo, C., Convey, P., Frati, F. & Fanciulli, P.P. 2020b. Evidence for cryptic diversity in the ‘pan-Antarctic’ springtail Friesea antarctica and the description of two new species. Insects, 11, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castello, M. & Nimis, P.L. 1995. The lichen vegetation of Terra Nova Bay (Victoria Land, continental Antarctica). Bibliotheca Lichenologica, 58, 4355.Google Scholar
Castello, M. & Nimis, P.L. 1997. Diversity of lichens in Antarctica. In Battaglia, B., Valencia, J. & Walton, D.W.H. eds. Antarctic communities. Species, structure and survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1521.Google Scholar
Chatey, D., Parker, B.C., Simmons, G.M., Yongue, W.N. & Brunt, M.R. 1981. The microfauna of algal mats and artificial substrates in Southern Victoria Land lakes of Antarctica. Hydrobiologia, 85, 315.Google Scholar
Chown, S.L., Lee, J.E., Hughes, K.A., Barnes, J., Barrett, P.J., Bergstrom, D.M., et al. 2012. Challenges to the future conservation of the Antarctic. Science, 337, 158159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, N.J. 1969. The effects of volcanic activity on the vegetation of Deception Island. BAS Bulletin, No. 21, 7994.Google Scholar
Conservation of Antarctic Fauna and Flora. 2009. Annex II to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Measure 16 Attachment. Brussels: Conservation of Antarctic Fauna and Flora, 8 pp.Google Scholar
Convey, P. 1996. Overwintering strategies of terrestrial invertebrates from Antarctica - the significance of flexibility in extremely seasonal environments. European Journal of Entomology, 93, 489e505.Google Scholar
Convey, P. 2010. Terrestrial biodiversity in Antarctica - recent advantages and future challenges. Polar Science, 4, 135147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convey, P. & Peck, L.S. 2019. Antarctic environmental changes and biological responses. Science Advances, 11, eaaz0888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convey, P. & Stevens, M.I. 2007. Antarctic biodiversity. Science, 317, 18771878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Convey, P., Biersma, E.M., Casanova-Katny, A. & Maturana, C.S. 2020. Refuges of Antarctic diversity. In Oliva, M. & Ruiz-Fernández, J. eds. Past Antarctica. Burlington, VA: Academic Press, 181200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convey, P., Gibson, J., Hillenbrand, C.D., Hodgson, D.A., Pugh, P J.A., Smellie, J.L. & Stevens, M.I. 2008. Antarctic terrestrial life - challenging the history of the frozen continent? Biological Reviews, 83, 103117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Convey, P., Coulson, S.J., Worland, M.R. & Sjöblom, A. 2018. The importance of understanding annual and shorter-term temperature patterns and variation in the surface levels of polar soils. Polar Biology, 41, 15871605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convey, P., Chown, S.L., Clarke, A., Barnes, D.K.A., Cummings, V., Ducklow, H., et al. 2014. The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity. Ecological Monographs, 84, 203244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danis, B., Griffths, H.J. & Jangoux, M. 2014. Asteroidea. In Broyer, De, Koubbi, C., Griffiths, P., Raymond, H.J., Udekem d'Acoz, B., Van de Putte, C., A.P., , et al. eds. Biogeographic atlas of the Southern Ocean. Cambridge: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, 200207.Google Scholar
Dartnall, H.J.G. 1993. The rotifers of Macquarie Island. ANARE Research Notes, 89, 141.Google Scholar
Dartnall, H.J.G. 1995a. Rotifers, and other aquatic invertebrates, from the Larsemann Hills, Antarctica. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, 129, 1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dartnall, H.J.G. 1995b. The rotifers of Heard Island: preliminary survey, with notes on other freshwater groups. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, 129, 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dartnall, H.J.G. 2000. A limnological reconnaissance of the vestfold hills. ANARE Reports Australian Antarctic Division, 141, 155.Google Scholar
Dartnall, H.J.G. & Hollowday, E.D. 1985. Antarctic rotifers. BAS Scientific Reports, 100, 146.Google Scholar
Dartnall, H.J.G., Hollwedel, H. & de Paggi, J.C. 2005. The freshwater fauna of Macquarie Island, including a redescription of the endemic water-flea Daphnia gelida (Brady) (Anomopoda: Crustacea). Polar Biology, 28, 922939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dastych, H. 1984. The Tardigrada from Antarctic with descriptions of several new species. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 27, 377436.Google Scholar
De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., Udekem d'Acoz, C. d', Van de Putte, A.P., et al. , eds. 2014. Biogeographic atlas of the Southern Ocean. Cambridge: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, 510 pp.Google Scholar
De Smet, W.H. 2001. Freshwater Rotifera from plankton of the Kerguelen Islands (Subantarctica). Hydrobiologia, 446, 261272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, W.H. & Pourriot, R. 1997. Guides to identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world. 12. Rotifera. Volume 5. The Dicranophoridae (Monogononta). The Ituridae (Monogononta). The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing, 344 pp.Google Scholar
Del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. & Sargatal, J. 1992. Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol. 1: ostrich to ducks. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, 696 pp.Google Scholar
Dewitt, H.H., Heemstra, P.C. & Gon, O. 1990. Nototheniidae. In Gon, O. & Heemstra, P.C., eds. Fishes of the Southern Ocean. Grahamstown: J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, 279331.Google Scholar
Dolgikh, A.V., Mergelov, N.S., Abramov, A.A., Lupachev, A.V. & Goryachkin, S.V. 2015. Soils of Enderby Land. In Bockheim, J.G. ed. Soils of Antarctica. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 4563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donner, J. 1965. Ordnung Bdelloidea (Rotatoria, Rädertiere). Bestimmungsbücher zur Bodenfauna Europas. Berlin: Akademie, 297 pp.Google Scholar
Duhamel, G., Hulley, P. A., Causse, R., Koubbi, P., Vacchi, M., Belchier, M., et al. 2014. Biogeographic patterns of fishes. In Broyer, De, Koubbi, C., Griffiths, P., Raymond, H.J., Udekem d'Acoz, B., Van de Putte, C., A.P., ., et al. eds. Biogeographic atlas of the Southern Ocean. Cambridge: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, 364387.Google Scholar
Everitt, D.A. 1981. An ecological study of an Antarctic freshwater pool with particular reference to Tardigrada and Rotifera. Hydrobiologia, 83, 225237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filson, R.B. 1975. Studies in Antarctic lichens. V. Lichenes Antarctici Exiccati, Fascicle I, with additional notes on the taxonomy of each species. Muelleria, 3, 146158.Google Scholar
Fischer, W. 1985. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Southern Ocean. Volume II. Rome: FAO of the UN, 471 pp.Google Scholar
Fraser, C.I., Nikula, R., Ruzzante, D.E. & Waters, J.M. 2012. Poleward bound: biological impacts of Southern Hemisphere glaciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 462471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golubkova, N.S., Savich, V.P. & Simonov, I.M. 1969. Lichainiki zapadnoi chasti Zemli Enderbi [Lichens of the western part of Enderby Land]. Proceedings of the Soviet Antarctic Expedition, 38, 247253.Google Scholar
Gon, O. 1990. Bathydraconidae. In Gon, O. & Heemstra, P.C., eds. Fishes of the Southern Ocean. Grahamstown: J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, 364380.Google Scholar
Green, T.G.A., Sancho, L.G., Türk, R., Seppelt, R.D. & Hohh, I.D. 2011. High diversity of lichens at 84°S, Queen Maud Mountains, suggests preglacial survival of species in the Ross Sea region, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 34, 12111220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenslade, P. 2018a. A new species of Friesea (Collembola: Neanuridae) from the Antarctic Continent. Journal of Natural History, 52, 21972207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenslade, P. 2018b. An Antarctic biogeographical anomaly resolved: the true identity of a widespread species of Collembola. Polar Biology, 41, 969981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruzov, Ye.N. & Pushkin, A.F. 1973. Rezultaty podvodnyh gidrobiologicheskih issledovaniy [Results of underwater hydrobiological studies]. Proceedings of the Soviet Antarctic Expedition, 56, 125134.Google Scholar
Hansson, L.A., Hylander, S., Dartnall, H.J.G., Lidström, S. & Svensson, J.E. 2012. High zooplankton diversity in the extreme environments of the McMurdo Dry Valley lakes, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 24, 131138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häussermann, V. & Försterra, G. 2009. Marine benthic fauna of Chilean Patagonia. Santiago: Nature in Focus, 1000 pp.Google Scholar
Hibbert, T. & Moore, K. 2009. Field identification guide to Heard Island and McDonald Islands benthic invertebrates. A guide for scientific observers aboard fishing vessels. Kingston: Australian Antarctic Division, 159 pp.Google Scholar
Iakovenko, N.S., Kašparová, E., Plewka, M. & Janko, K. 2013. Otostephanos (Rotifera, Bdelloidea, Habrotrochidae) with the description of two new species. Systematics and Biodiversity, 24, 113. dGoogle Scholar
Iakovenko, N.S., Smykla, J., Convey, P., Kašparová, E., Kozeretska, I.A., Trokhymets, V., et al. 2015. Antarctic bdelloid rotifers: diversity, endemism and evolution. Hydrobiologia, 761, 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakubowski, M. 1970. Morphological features of the lateral line organs in members of the Antarctic genus Trematomus Boul. (Nototheniidae, Pisces). Journal of Ichthyology, 10, 268271.Google Scholar
Jakubowski, M. 1975. Anatomical structure of olfactory organs provided with internal nares in the Antarctic fish Gymnodraco acuticeps Boul. (Bathydraconidae). Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, 23, 115120.Google Scholar
Jakubowski, M. & Rembiszewski, J. M. 1974. Vascularization and size of respiratory surfaces of gills and skin in the Antarctic fish Gymnodraco acuticeps Boul. (Bathydraconidae). Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Biological Sciences, 22, 305–313.Google Scholar
Kanda, H. & Inoue, M. 1994. Ecological monitoring of moss and lichen vegetation in the Syowa station area, Antarctica. Proceedings of NIPR Symposium on Polar Biology, 7, 221231.Google Scholar
Klekowski, R.Z., Opaliński, K.W. & Rakusa-Suszczewski, S. 1973. Respiration of Antarctic amphipod Paramoera walkeri Stebbing during the winter season. Polish Archive of Hydrobiology, 20, 301308.Google Scholar
Kurbatova, L.Ye., Andreev, M.P. & Dolgikh, A.V. 2014. Mhi oazisa Moloduozhyi (Zemlya Enderby, Antarctica) [Bryophytes of the oasis Molodyoznyi (Enderby Land, Antarctica)]. Novitates systematicas plantarum non-vascularium, 48, 365373.Google Scholar
Kutikova, L.A. 1970. Kolovratki fauny SSSR. Chast V. Podklass Eurotatoria (Otriady Ploimida, Monimotrochida, Paedotrochida) [Rotifers in the fauna of USSR. Part V. Subclass Eurotatoria (Orders Ploimida, Monimotrochida, Paedotrochida)]. St Petersburg: Science, 744 pp.Google Scholar
Kutikova, L.A. 1991. Kolovratki vnutrennih vod Vostochnoj Antarktidy [Rotifers of the inland waters of East Antarctica]. Soviet Antarctic Expedition Information Bulletin, 116, 8799.Google Scholar
Kutikova, L.A. 2005. Bdelloidnye kolovratki fauny Rossii [Bdelloid rotifers in the fauna of Russia]. Moscow: The Community of Scientific Publications KMK, 315 pp.Google Scholar
MacNamara, E.E. 1969. Pedology of Enderby land, Antarctica. Antarctic Journal of the USA, 4, 208209.Google Scholar
Mah, C.L. 2021. World Asteroidea Database. Odontaster validus Koehler, 1906. Available through World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=172775 on 29 March 2021.Google Scholar
McCarthy, P.M. & Elis, J.A. 2014. The lichen genus Rhizocarpon in mainland Australia. Telopea, 16, 195211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, P.J., Marriott, P., Hanchet, S.M., Fenaughty, J.M., Mackay, E., Sui, H. & Wei, F. 2014. Fishes of the Ross Sea Region: a field guide to common species caught in the longline fishery. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 134. Wellington: Ministry for Primary Industries, 54 pp.Google Scholar
Nayaka, S. & Upreti, D. K. 2005. Schirmacher Oasis, East Antarctica, a lichenologically interesting region. Current Science, 89, 10691071.Google Scholar
Nogrady, Th., Poirrot, R. & Segers, H. 1995. Guides to identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world. 8. Rotifera. Volume 3. The Notommatidae. The Scaridiidae. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing, 249 pp.Google Scholar
Ochyra, R. & Singh, S.M. 2008. Three remarkable moss records from Dronning Maud Land, continental Antarctica. Nova Hedwigia, 86, 497506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochyra, R., Bernadek-Ochyra, H. & Smith, R.I.L 2008a. New and rare moss species from the Antarctic. Nova Hedwigia, 87, 457477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochyra, R., Smith, R.I.L & Bendarek-Ochyra, H. 2008b. Illustrated moss flora of Antarctica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 704 pp.Google Scholar
Opaliński, K. 1972. Flora and fauna in freshwater bodies of the Thala Hills oasis (Enderby Land, Eastern Antarctica). Polish Archive of Hydrobiology, 19, 383398.Google Scholar
Opaliński, K.W. 1974. Standard, routine, and active metabolism of the Antarctic amphipod - Paramoera walkeri Stebbing. Polish Archive of Hydrobiology, 21, 423429.Google Scholar
Orrell, T. 2021. NMNH Extant Specimen Records. Version 1.42. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. Occurrence dataset. Available at https://doi.org/10.15468/hnhrg3 accessed via GBIF.org on 29 March 2021.Google Scholar
Øvstedal, D.O. & Smith, R.I.L 2001. Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia. A guide to their identification and ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 411 pp.Google Scholar
Pandey, V. & Upreti, D.K. 2000. Lichen flora of Schirmacher oasis and Vettiyya nunatak. In XVth Indian Expedition to Antarctica, Scientific Report. Department of Ocean Development, New Delhi: 185–201.Google Scholar
Peat, H.J., Clarke, A. & Convey, P. 2007. Diversity and biogeography of the Antarctic flora. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 132146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilato, G. & Binda, M.G. 2010. Definition of families, subfamilies, genera and subgenera of the Eutardigrada, and keys to their identification. Zootaxa, 2404, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, P.J.A. & Convey, P. 2008. Surviving out in the cold: Antarctic endemic invertebrates and their refugia. Journal of Biogeography, 35, 21762186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, H., Khare, R., Nayaka, S., Upreti, D.K. & Gupta, R. K. 2011. Lichen synusiae in East Antarctica (Schirmacher Oasis and Larsemann Hills): substratum and morphological preferences. Czech Polar Reports, 1, 6577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakusa-Suszczewski, S. 1972a. Respiration of the Antarctic fish eggs (Trematomus borchgrevinki Boul.). Polish Archive of Hydrobiology, 19, 399401.Google Scholar
Rakusa-Suszczewski, S. 1972b. The biology of Paramoera walkeri Stebbing (Amphipoda) and the Antarctic sub-fast ice community. Polish Archive of Hydrobiology, 19, 1136.Google Scholar
Rakusa-Suszczewski, S. & Klekowski, R.Z. 1973. Biology and respiration of Antarctic Amphipoda (Paramoera walkeri Stebbing) in the summer. Polish Archive of Hydrobiology, 20, 475488.Google Scholar
Ramazzotti, G. & Maucci, W. 1983. Phylum Tardigrada. Memorie dell'istituto Italiano di idrobiologia, 41, 11012.Google Scholar
Rauschert, M. & Arntz, W. E. 2015. Antarctic macrobenthos. A field guide of the invertebrates living at the Antarctic seafloor. Bremen: Druckerei Girzig+Gottschalk GmbH, 161 pp.Google Scholar
Read, G. & Fauchald, K., eds. 2021. World Polychaeta Database. Serpula narconensis Baird, 1864. Available through World Register of Marine Species at https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=174663 on 29 March 2021.Google Scholar
Rocka, A. 2006. Helminths of Antarctic fishes: life cycle biology, specificity and geographical distribution. Acta Parasitologica, 51, 2635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, A.D., Johnston, N.M., Murphy, E.J. & Clarke, A. 2012. Antarctic ecosystems: an extreme environment in a changing world. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 538 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ropert-Coudert, Y., Hindell, M.A., Phillips, R., Charrassin, J.B., Trudelle, L. & Raymond, B. 2014. Biogeographic patterns of birds and mammals. In De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., Udekem d'Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., et al. , eds. Biogeographic atlas of the Southern Ocean. Cambridge: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, 364387.Google Scholar
Saucede, T., Pierrat, B. & David, B. 2014. Echinoids. In Broyer, De, Koubbi, C., Griffiths, P., Raymond, H.J., Udekem d'Acoz, B., Van de Putte, C., A.P., , et al. eds. Biogeographic atlas of the Southern Ocean. Cambridge: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, 213220.Google Scholar
Savicz-Lyubitskaya L.I. & Smirnova Z.N. 1972. Bryum algens Card. = naibolee obyknovenny moh Vostochnoy Antarktidy [Bryum algens Card. - the most common moss in East Antarctica]. Proceedings of the Soviet Antarctic Expedition, 60, 328345.Google Scholar
SCAR. 2018. Environmental Code of Conduct for Terrestrial Scientific Field Research in Antarctica. Resolution 5 Annex. Cambridge: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, 6 pp.Google Scholar
Schwoerbel, J. 1972. Methods of hydrobiology. 1st edition. Freshwater ecology. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 210 pp.Google Scholar
Sharov, A.N., Berezina, N.A. & Tolstikov, A.V. 2015. Life under ice in the perennial ice-covered Lake Glubokoe in summer (eastern Antarctica). Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management, 20, 120127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, K. 2021. Life in the extreme: when did tardigrades colonise Antarctica? PhD thesis, University of Bristol, 205 pp.Google Scholar
Simonov, I.M. 1971. Oazisy Vostochnoj Antarktidy [East Antarctic Oases]. Leningrad: Hydrometeoizdat, 176 pp.Google Scholar
Singh, S.M. & Nayaka, S. 2017. Contributions to the floral diversity of Schirmacher Oasis and Larsemann Hills, Antarctica. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 83, 469481.Google Scholar
Singh, S.M., Nayaka, S. & Upreti, D.K. 2007. Lichen communities in Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica. Current Science, 93, 16701672.Google Scholar
Singh, S.M., Olech, M., Cannone, N. & Convey, P. 2015. Contrasting patterns in lichen diversity in the Continental and Maritime Antarctic. Polar Science, 9, 311318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirenko, B.I., Gagaev, S.Yu. & Smirnov, I.S. eds. 2017. Vidovoe raznoobrazie bioty b rasprostranenie lonnyh soobshchestv Zaliva Priuds, More Sodruzhestva (Vostochnaya Antarktida) [The biota species diversity and the distribution of the bottom communities in Prydz Bay, Commonwealth Sea (East Antarctica)]. St Petersburg: RAS, 274 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, R.I.L. 1984. Colonization by bryophytes following recent volcanic activity on an Antarctic island. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 56, 5363.Google Scholar
Smith, R.I.L. 1988. Classification and ordination of cryptogamic communities in Wilkes Land, Continental Antarctica. Vegetatio, 76, 155166.Google Scholar
Smith, R.I.L. 2005. The thermophilic bryoflora of Deception Island: unique plant communities as a criterion for designating an Antarctic Specially Protected Area. Antarctic Science, 17, 1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smykla, K., Krzewicka, B., Wilk, K., Emslie, S.D. & Sliwa, L. 2011. Additions to the lichen flora of Victoria Land, Antarctica. Polish Polar Research, 32, 123138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohlenius, B. & Boström, S. 2005. The geographic distribution of metazoan microfauna on East Antarctic nunataks. Polar Biology, 28, 439448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohlenius, B., Boström, S. & Hirschfelder, A. 1995. Nematodes, rotifers and tardigrades from nunataks in Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. Polar Biology, 15, 5156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speilmann, A.A. & Pereira, A.B. 2012. Lichens on the Maritime Antarctica (a small field guide for some common species). Glalia, 4, 128.Google Scholar
Starmach, K. 1995. Freshwater algae of the Thala Hills oasis (Enderby Land, East Antarctic). Polish Polar Research, 16, 113148.Google Scholar
Stöhr, S., O'Hara, T. & Thuy, B., eds. 2020. World Ophiuroidea Database. Ophiosparte gigas Koehler, 1922. Available through World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=173270 on 8 July 2020.Google Scholar
Strandtmann, R.W. 1967. Terrestrial Prostigmata (Turbidiform mites). Antarctic Research Studies, 10, 5180.Google Scholar
Suren, A. 1990. Microfauna associated with algal mats in meltwater ponds of the Ross Ice Shelf. Polar Biology, 10, 329335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsujimoto, M., McInnes, S.J., Convey, P. & Imura, S. 2014. Preliminary description of tardigrade species diversity and distribution pattern around coastal Syowa Station and inland Sør Rondane Mountains, Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. Polar Biology, 37, 13611367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, M.B. & Booth, R.G. 1984. Arthropod communities in a maritime Antarctic moss-turf habitat: three-dimensional distribution of mites and collembola. Journal of Animal Ecology, 53, 427441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utsugi, K. & Ohyama, Y. 1991. Antarctic Tardigrada II. Molodezhnaya and Mt. Riiser-Larsen areas. Proceedings of the NIPR Symposium on Polar Biology, 4, 161170.Google Scholar
Webster-Brown, J., Gall, M., Gibson, J.A.E., Wood, S. & Hawes, I. 2010. The biogeochemistry of meltwaterwater habitats in the Darwin Glacier region (80 S), Victoria Land, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 22, 646661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, K.A.J. 1971. The Collembola of Antarctica. Pacific Insects Monograph, 25, 5774.Google Scholar
WoRMS. 2021a. Contracaecum osculatum (Rudolphi, 1802) Baylis, 1920. Available at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=122907 on 29 March 2021.Google Scholar
WoRMS. 2021b. Contracaecum radiatum (Linstow, 1907) Baylis, 1920. Available at https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=527911 on 29 March 2021.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Characteristic landscapes of the eastern part of the Thala Hills oasis (photographs by Dzmitry A. Lukashanets).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Study area. a. The location of the Thala Hills oasis on the coast of East Antarctica. b. Satellite image of the eastern part of the Thala Hills oasis (Vechernyaya Mount). BAS = Belarus Antarctic Station.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Sampling and observing sites in the area of the Belarus Antarctic Station (BAS) ‘Vechernyaya Mount’ in the eastern part of the Thala Hills oasis. a. Aquatic habitats: freshwater and marine (for details, see Supplemental Table S1). b. Vegetation sampling sites (for details, see Supplemental Table S2). c. Terrestrial substrates sampled for micrometazoans (for details, see Supplemental Table S3). d. Birds and mammals (for details, see Supplemental Table S4).

Figure 3

Table I. Checklist of the biota recorded from the Thala Hills oasis, with notes on wider distribution and biogeography.

Figure 4

Table II. Comparison of lichen assemblages between Vechernyaya Mount, eastern Thala Hills, obtained in recent surveys, and Molodyozhnaya, western Thala Hills (extracted from Andreev 2013).

Figure 5

Table III. Rotifers obtained from freshwater lakes (n = 18) and temporary ponds (n = 27) in the Thala Hills oasis.

Figure 6

Table IV. Parasites associated with Trematomus spp. sampled in the Cosmonaut Sea (nfish = 32; nparasites = 1512).

Figure 7

Fig. 4. All species records (lichens, embryophytes, metazoans) available from the Thala Hills oasis (literature data plus current study). Marine In = marine invertebrates; Marine LA = marine large animals (fish, seals, birds); Ter FW MI = terrestrial and freshwater micro-invertebrates; Ter MA = terrestrial micro-arthropods.

Figure 8

Fig. 5. Biogeographic analysis of all species (lichens, embryophytes, metazoans) known from the Thala Hills oasis. Marine In = marine invertebrates; Marine LA = marine large animals (fish, seals, birds); Ter FW MI = terrestrial and freshwater micro-invertebrates; Ter MA = terrestrial micro-arthropods.

Supplementary material: File

Lukashanets et al. supplementary material

Lukashanets et al. supplementary material

Download Lukashanets et al. supplementary material(File)
File 31.4 KB