Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T05:58:07.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ecology of periphyton in a meltwater stream ecosystem in the maritime Antarctic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2003

JOSEF ELSTER
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Botany, Dukelská 135, CZ 379 82 Trebon, Czech Republic and University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Branisovská 31, CZ 378 01, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic jelster@butbn.cas.cz
ONDREJ KOMAREK
Affiliation:
Masaryk University, Faculty of Sciences, Kotlárská 2, CZ 611 36 Brno, Czech Republic
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The ecology of two meltwater streams on King George Island, Ornithologists Creek (with penguin rookeries close to its lower reaches) and Petrified Forest Creek (a highly oligotrophic system), was studied during the 1996–97 summer season. To estimate seasonal productivity of the periphyton and to establish which environmental parameters influenced periphyton growth most strongly, two types of artificial substrata (fibreglass nets – ash-free dry weight (AFDW), and microscope slides – Chlorophyll a (Chl a)) were tested in situ. Thus relative periphyton productivity (RPP) reflects algal colonization and growth as well as losses due to cell mortality and abrasive action of moving sediments. The Petrified Forest Creek was more productive (AFDW = 108.63 μg cm−2 d−1, Chl a = 0.35 μg g cm−2 d−1) than the Ornithologists Creek (AFDW = 69.90 μg cm−2 d−-1, Chl a = 0.26 μg cm−2 d−1). RPP differed both along the streams, and during the season. Significant positive or negative relationships (generalized linear models) were found between RPP and streamwater ‘physico-chemical parameters’ and ‘geomorphological-geographical characteristics’ of the streams' catchments. In addition, in the lower reaches of both streams almost no active colonization or growth was recorded. In the Petrified Forest Creek, the periphyton biomass was so high that mainly passive organic matter deposition occurred. By contrast, in the lower reach of Ornithologists Creek, periphyton colonization and growth was around zero, being negatively influenced by penguin excrement. Ornithologists Creek was richer in nutrients (DIN, DRP), which also fluctuated more widely along its length and throughout the season, than in the Petrified Forest Creek. Parameters associated with the inorganic carbon cycle of the streamwater reflect higher RPP in Petrified Forest Creek. Moreover, RPP was higher in stream reaches with higher amounts of gravel boulders on the bottom.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2003