Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T10:10:48.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of antibiotic resistance (AR) and microbiota shifts on Campylobacter jejuni-mediated diseases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2018

Phillip T. Brooks
Affiliation:
Comparative Enteric Diseases Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Comparative Medicine and Integrative Biology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Institute for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Linda S. Mansfield*
Affiliation:
Comparative Enteric Diseases Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Comparative Medicine and Integrative Biology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: mansfie4@cvm.msu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Campylobacter jejuni is an important zoonotic pathogen recently designated a serious antimicrobial resistant (AR) threat. While most patients with C. jejuni experience hemorrhagic colitis, serious autoimmune conditions can follow including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the acute neuropathy Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS). This review examines inter-relationships among factors mediating C. jejuni diarrheal versus autoimmune disease especially AR C. jejuni and microbiome shifts. Because both susceptible and AR C. jejuni are acquired from animals or their products, we consider their role in harboring strains. Inter-relationships among factors mediating C. jejuni colonization, diarrheal and autoimmune disease include C. jejuni virulence factors and AR, the enteric microbiome, and host responses. Because AR C. jejuni have been suggested to affect the severity of disease, length of infections and propensity to develop GBS, it is important to understand how these interactions occur when strains are under selection by antimicrobials. More work is needed to elucidate host–pathogen interactions of AR C. jejuni compared with susceptible strains and how AR C. jejuni are maintained and evolve in animal reservoirs and the extent of transmission to humans. These knowledge gaps impair the development of effective strategies to prevent the emergence of AR C. jejuni in reservoir species and human populations.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Introduction

Campylobacter jejuni continues to cause disease worldwide despite several decades of efforts to control these infections (CDC, 2017). The concerning rise of AR C. jejuni incidence predicts future increases in enteritis cases and enhanced risk of Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS) (CDC, 2013). Because C. jejuni is a broad host range pathogen that infects animals and subsequently humans, a major gap in our understanding is curbing infection in animals (Oliver et al., Reference Oliver, Patel, Callaway and Torrence2009). Despite many efforts, simple hygiene or biological control measures in food animal production environments have failed to deliver adequate control of C. jejuni carriage in animals (Oliver et al., Reference Oliver, Patel, Callaway and Torrence2009; Newell et al., Reference Newell, Elvers, Dopfer, Hansson, Jones, James, Gittins, Stern, Davies, Connerton, Pearson, Salvat and Allen2011). A better understanding of the interactive factors mediating C. jejuni colonization and disease in animals and people is needed.

Interactive factors mediating enteric disease were poorly understood until the age of high throughput analysis of bacterial transcriptomics, host responses, and microbial communities. These tools have spurred studies to examine these factors together for their roles in Campylobacter disease pathogenesis. For example, mechanistic work in human and mouse models has informed inter-relationships among factors promoting colonization or enhancing disease, including C. jejuni virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance, the enteric microbiome, and host responses controlling susceptibility, resistance, or autoimmunity. It is now well known that significant genetic variation occurs in virulence and lipooligosaccharide (LOS) loci between C. jejuni strains from enteritis and GBS patients (Godschalk et al., Reference Godschalk, Kuijf, Li, St Michael, Ang, Jacobs, Karwaski, Brochu, Moterassed, Endtz, van Belkum and Gilbert2007) and that these modifications mediate a switch in host adaptive responses and disease phenotype (Malik et al., Reference Malik, Sharma, St Charles, Dybas and Mansfield2014). For example, the GBS strain 260.94 can elicit type 2 responses with IgG1 autoantibodies against GM1 and GD1a nerve gangliosides due to sialylation of the outer core of the LOS mimicking these structures, while most isolates from patients with enteritis do not have these modifications and cannot provoke these responses (Malik et al., Reference Malik, Sharma, St Charles, Dybas and Mansfield2014). Yet the exact mechanisms controlling these different syndromes are largely unknown.

Likewise, little is known about AR C. jejuni. Few studies focus on how they are maintained in and evolve in animal reservoirs and the extent to which they are transmitted to humans. Furthermore, little experimental work has been done to elucidate the host–pathogen interactions of AR C. jejuni and how they compare with susceptible strains. In fact, previous opinions upheld the concept that antibiotic resistance carriage was associated with a fitness cost for C. jejuni (Almofti et al., Reference Almofti, Dai, Sun, Hao, Liu, Cheng and Yuan2011), but this varies according to the resistance-conferring mutation (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Sahin, McDermott and Payot2006). Many studies now indicate that antibiotic resistance is able to enhance C. jejuni fitness in vivo (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Lin and Pereira2003; Luo et al., Reference Luo, Pereira, Sahin, Lin, Huang, Michel and Zhang2005) yet the effect of this on virulence during in vivo infections has only been lightly explored (Moore et al., Reference Moore, Barton, Blair, Corcoran, Dooley, Fanning, Kempf, Lastovica, Lowery, Matsuda, McDowell, McMahon, Millar, Rao, Rooney, Seal, Snelling and Tolba2006). Recent work linking AR and other factors to C. jejuni disease have been conducted in animal models. Animals used to study the pathogenesis of C. jejuni infection include mice, rats, rabbits, pigs, chickens, and ferrets (Newell, Reference Newell2001; Mansfield et al., Reference Mansfield, Bell, Wilson, Murphy, Elsheikha, Rathinam, Fierro, Linz and Young2007; Reference Mansfield, Schauer, Fox, Nachamkin, Szymanski and Blaser2008b). Mice provide many advantages including (1) low cost to maintain, (2) small space requirements for housing, allowing larger samples sizes, (3) ease of manipulation, and (4) availability of genetic knockouts. Development of murine C. jejuni colonization and colitis models has been greatly advanced by manipulation of host genetics and host microbiota (Chang and Miller, Reference Chang and Miller2006; Mansfield et al., Reference Mansfield, Patterson, Fierro, Murphy, Rathinam, Kopper, Barbu, Onifade and Bell2008a; Bereswill et al., Reference Bereswill, Fischer, Plickert, Haag, Otto, Kühl, Dasti, Zautner, Muñoz, Loddenkemper, Gross, Göbel and Heimesaat2011; Malik et al., Reference Malik, Sharma, St Charles, Dybas and Mansfield2014; Stahl et al., Reference Stahl, Ries, Vermeulen, Yang, Sham, Crowley, Badayeva, Turvey, Gaynor, Li and Vallance2014; O'Loughlin et al., Reference O'Loughlin, Samuelson, Braundmeier-Fleming, White, Haldorson, Stone, Lessmann, Eucker and Konkel2015; Brooks et al., Reference Brooks, Brakel, Bell, Bejcek, Gilpin, Brudvig and Mansfield2017). A summary of these advances is also provided, highlighting interactive factors mediating disease after C. jejuni oral infection (Fig. 1). Such comparative analysis of C. jejuni disease in humans and mouse models can aid in understanding these complex relationships, especially the effects of AR on virulence.

Figure 1. The major factors that interact to produce gastrointestinal disease. Host innate responses coupled with the gut microbiota can produce colonization resistance to certain enteric pathogens. Diet and other environmental factors such as antibiotic treatment can modify the microbiome and select for pathogen resistance. Many other interactions are possible that have yet to be explored experimentally.

Epidemiology of susceptible and AR C. jejuni: human and animal studies

Human studies

C. jejuni is an important zoonotic pathogen causing 1.3 million cases of hemorrhagic gastroenteritis annually in the USA, leading to 13,000 hospitalizations, 120 deaths (Scallan et al., Reference Scallan, Hoekstra, Angulo, Tauxe, Widdowson, Roy, Jones and Griffin2011) and many unreported sporadic cases. Campylobacter cases represented 9% of the 9.4 million episodes of foodborne illness reported in 2011, but it represented 15% of those cases requiring hospitalization. Human infection occurs via the oral route and most often results from the consumption of raw or undercooked poultry (Young et al., Reference Young, Davis and Dirita2007). Contaminated meat products and water, contact with pets, and international travel result in sporadic infections (Ketley, Reference Ketley1997; Altekruse et al., Reference Altekruse, Stern, Fields and Swerdlow1999; Bopp et al., Reference Bopp, Sauders, Waring, Ackelsberg, Dumas, Braun-Howland, Dziewulski, Wallace, Kelly, Halse, Musser, Smith, Morse and Limberger2003); outbreaks have been associated with unpasteurized milk and contaminated water (Ketley, Reference Ketley1997; Allos, Reference Allos2001; Cawthraw et al., Reference Cawthraw, Feldman, Sayers and Newell2002; Bopp et al., Reference Bopp, Sauders, Waring, Ackelsberg, Dumas, Braun-Howland, Dziewulski, Wallace, Kelly, Halse, Musser, Smith, Morse and Limberger2003).

C. jejuni was recently designated a ‘serious level’ antimicrobial resistant threat by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (CDC, 2013). Resistance to ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone used to treat more severe infections, has increased in the USA from 13% in 1997 to 25% in 2011 (CDC, 2013) and was estimated to cause 310,000 of the 1.3 million infections each year (Scallan et al., Reference Scallan, Hoekstra, Angulo, Tauxe, Widdowson, Roy, Jones and Griffin2011). Moreover, in 2014 ciprofloxacin resistance was detected in 26.7% of C. jejuni human isolates, in 28% of C. jejuni chicken isolates and in more than 35% of Campylobacter coli isolates from human beings (FDA, 2014). Resistance to azithromycin, a commonly used macrolide, was also estimated to occur in 2% (n = 22,000) of Campylobacter infections in 2011 (Scallan et al., Reference Scallan, Hoekstra, Angulo, Tauxe, Widdowson, Roy, Jones and Griffin2011). Based on NARMS 2015 data the percentages of human C. jejuni isolates carrying resistance to other antibiotics included 46% tetracycline, 23% nalidixic acid, 9.9% florfenicol, 7.2% clindamycin, 1.9% telithromycin, 1.7% erythromycin, 0.9% gentamicin, and 0.8% chloramphenicol (CDC, 2017).

The use of antibiotics is the most important factor driving selection for antibiotic resistance with dominant applications occurring in healthcare, agriculture and the environment (Holmes et al., Reference Holmes, Moore, Sundsfjord, Steinbakk, Regmi, Karkey, Guerin and Piddock2016). Yet there is ongoing controversy regarding which practices in human medicine and veterinary medicine are most harmful in enhancing AR. In human medicine upwards of half of the prescribed antibiotics are unnecessary or mis-prescribed, while in food animal medicine the FDA has recommended phase-out of antibiotics for promoting growth (CDC, 2013). Notably, in most studies on antibiotic use, the risks to human health or the benefits to animal production have not been well studied (Landers et al., Reference Landers, Cohen, Wittum and Larson2012).

Animal studies

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract of domestic and wild animals is the natural ecological niche for C. jejuni, making it a broad host-range pathogen. Naturally occurring infections with C. jejuni have been reported in juvenile Rhesus monkeys (Fitzgeorge et al., Reference Fitzgeorge, Baskerville and Lander1981), macaques (Sestak et al., Reference Sestak, Merritt, Borda, Saylor, Schwamberger, Cogswell, Didier, Didier, Plauche, Bohm, Aye, Alexa, Ward and Lackner2003), ferrets (Fox, Reference Fox, Nachamkin, Blaser and Tompkins1992), dogs (Bruce et al., Reference Bruce, Zochowski and Fleming1980; Fox et al., Reference Fox, Moore and Ackerman1983) swine (Mansfield and Urban, Reference Mansfield and Urban1996), and wild birds (Kaakoush et al., Reference Kaakoush, Castano-Rodriguez, Mitchell and Man2015). Most avian species serve as asymptomatic reservoirs for Campylobacter and infect other birds through common water and feeding sources (Kaakoush et al., Reference Kaakoush, Castano-Rodriguez, Mitchell and Man2015). Domestic poultry is colonized with C. jejuni without disease and are considered a principal risk factor for human infection (McCrackin et al., Reference McCrackin, Helke, Galloway, Poole, Salgado and Marriott2016). This is not surprising because broiler flocks have a high rate of C. jejuni carriage in their gut microbiome resulting in a high level in retail poultry (Kaakoush et al., Reference Kaakoush, Castano-Rodriguez, Mitchell and Man2015). In the USA, 50% of raw chicken in stores was contaminated with Campylobacter, likely due to transfer during slaughter and processing. Since 2007, 35% of Campylobacter outbreaks were caused by isolates from poultry, which was more than any other source (Kaakoush et al., Reference Kaakoush, Castano-Rodriguez, Mitchell and Man2015). In a recent 2015 study, the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System for Enteric Bacteria (NARMS) estimated that transmission of 50–80% of all human cases of campylobacteriosis are related to chickens. Other food animals, such as cattle, sheep, and swine, also harbor C. jejuni. Thus, animal exposures and consumption of raw or unpasteurized milk and untreated water also contribute to Campylobacter infections (Young et al., Reference Young, Davis and Dirita2007).

Animals constitute one of the main reservoirs of AR C. jejuni. With increasing use of quinolone antibiotics as growth promoters in the poultry industry, isolation of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains has increased significantly since 1992 (Kaakoush et al., Reference Kaakoush, Castano-Rodriguez, Mitchell and Man2015). While public health authorities of several countries, including the US FDA, have banned the use of fluoroquinolones for growth-promotion, such bans are not universal, and these drugs are still approved for treating infections in poultry. Unfortunately, the CDC reported in 2012 that the percentage of ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter isolates from retail chicken has remained unchanged since the ban took effect. Campylobacter isolates from dairy cattle on farms managed organically and conventionally had similar patterns of antimicrobial resistance, but the proportion of resistant isolates was higher for conventional than organic farms (Halbert et al., Reference Halbert, Kaneene, Linz, Mansfield, Wilson, Ruegg, Warnick, Wells, Fossler, Campbell and Geiger-Zwald2006). Resistance to seven of eight drugs (azithromycin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, and tetracycline) was very low and did not differ by farm type, but tetracycline resistance was 48% on organic and 58% on conventional dairy farms. Ten years later high rates of AR C. jejuni were isolated from three cattle herds in the same area of the Northeastern USA; 65.9% were resistant to tetracycline, 1.5% were resistant to macrolides, and 16.3% were resistant to ciprofloxacin (Cha et al., Reference Cha, Mosci, Wengert, Venegas Vargas, Rust, Bartlett, Grooms and Manning2017). Here, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based fingerprinting showed identical patterns between multilocus sequence type (ST)-982 isolates from cattle and people suggesting transmission. A large study examined the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter spp. in conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems in the US. Investigators found that 472/838 (56.3%) of pigs were positive for Campylobacter spp., which did not vary based on the production system (conventional 58.9% and antimicrobial-free 53.7%) (Tadesse et al., Reference Tadesse, Bahnson, Funk, Thakur, Morrow, Wittum, DeGraves, Rajala-Schultz and Gebreyes2011). Antibiotic resistance was detected to tetracycline (64.5%), erythromycin (47.9%), and nalidixic acid (23.5%), but only erythromycin resistance was found to be higher on conventional than antibiotic-free farms. Furthermore, a highly virulent tetracycline-resistant C. jejuni, termed clone SA, has been identified and linked to abortion in sheep and cattle (Sahin et al., Reference Sahin, Plummer, Jordan, Sulaj, Pereira, Robbe-Austerman, Wang, Yaeger, Hoffman and Zhang2008); this strain was also isolated from campylobacteriosis patients linked to raw cow's milk (Sahin et al., Reference Sahin, Fitzgerald, Stroika, Zhao, Sippy, Kwan, Plummer, Han, Yaeger and Zhang2012). Finally, in a northern Canada study, 58% of healthy dogs and 97% of diarrheic dogs were shedding C. jejuni in feces (Chaban et al., Reference Chaban, Ngeleka and Hill2010), but AR was not examined. In a similar Swiss study of healthy dogs, 6.3% had C. jejuni, 5.9% had Campylobacter upsaliensis and 0.7% had Campylobacter coli; no macrolide resistance was found, but 28 isolates (20.9%) were resistant to quinolones (Amar et al., Reference Amar, Kittl, Spreng, Thomann, Korczak, Burnens and Kuhnert2014). Here, 94% of the canine isolates had an ST that was also found in human clinical isolates. While these few examples suggest animal to human transmission, in-depth transmission studies have not been done. In a review of recent literature, it was discerned that on-farm antibiotic selection pressure does increase colonization of animals with drug-resistant C. jejuni, yet this has not yet been causally linked to the prevalence of drug-resistant foodborne enteric campylobacteriosis in human beings (McCrackin et al., Reference McCrackin, Helke, Galloway, Poole, Salgado and Marriott2016). However, studies estimating the impact of therapeutic treatment with fluoroquinolones for respiratory diseases in cattle on antibiotic resistance in Campylobacters suggest the impact is exceedingly small (Hurd et al., Reference Hurd, Vaughn, Holtkamp, Dickson and Warnick2010). Considering data published on the animal to human transmission of Campylobacter, there is little consideration given to the role of animals in the transfer of strains that cause autoimmune diseases.

Campylobacter jejuni colonization of the host

Colonization of animals and human beings

Chickens are natural hosts for C. jejuni, and infection results in high-level asymptomatic GI colonization without inflammatory responses or signs of disease (Kaakoush et al., Reference Kaakoush, Castano-Rodriguez, Mitchell and Man2015). (Hermans et al., Reference Hermans, Pasmans, Heyndrickx, Van Immerseel, Martel, Van Deun and Haesebrouck2012). Transmission in chickens occurs very early in life and is extremely rapid, which may be due to palatine colonization leading to transmission through communal water troughs and standard fecal-oral spread (Montrose et al., Reference Montrose, Shane and Harrington1985; Pearson et al., Reference Pearson, Greenwood, Healing, Rollins, Shahamat, Donaldson and Colwell1993). They mount detectable immune responses to C. jejuni that fail to limit colonization, and that is considered by some as a form of immunological tolerance to C. jejuni. Additionally, Campylobacter spp. have been isolated from free-living birds, including migratory birds and waterfowl, crows, gulls, and domestic pigeons (Hill and Grimes, Reference Hill and Grimes1984; Maruyama et al., Reference Maruyama, Tanaka, Katsube, Nakanishi and Nukina1990). Despite this high rate of colonization, disease in naturally infected birds due to C. jejuni is rare but can occur especially in psitticine birds (Young and Mansfield, Reference Young, Mansfield, Ketley and Konkel2005). Weis et al. (Reference Weis, Storey, Taff, Townsend, Huang, Kong, Clothier, Spinner, Byrne and Weimer2016) examined the genomes of Campylobacter spp. isolated from a broad range of animal hosts and showed that strains from human beings, non-human primates, chickens, cows, crows, goats, and sheep had some similarities. From their data, they postulated that 17% of Campylobacter spp. isolated from crows were highly similar to those isolated from human and nonhuman primates. These data show that environmental to human transmission is possible and provoke the need for an understanding of the eco-epidemiology of animal colonization with Campylobacter strains from different environments. Thus, more work is needed to understand host colonization mechanisms and zoonotic spread of this pathogen (Weis et al., Reference Weis, Storey, Taff, Townsend, Huang, Kong, Clothier, Spinner, Byrne and Weimer2016). Furthermore, for control measures to be successful, it will be necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying colonization resistance whereby the intestinal microbiota protects itself against incursion by C. jejuni.

In many mammals, including human beings, C. jejuni colonizes the GI tract and initiates GI inflammation. After oral infections, C. jejuni surviving the acid environment of the stomach adhere to intestinal epithelial cells or to the mucus overlying these cells and replicate, which can result either in asymptomatic colonization status or diarrheal illness (Janssen et al., Reference Janssen, Krogfelt, Cawthraw, van Pelt, Wagenaar and Owen2008). Experimental evidence shows that C. jejuni gastroenteritis is associated with specific strains of C. jejuni (Bell et al., Reference Bell, St Charles, Murphy, Rathinam, Plovanich-Jones, Stanley, Wolf, Gettings, Whittam and Mansfield2009; Malik et al., Reference Malik, Sharma, St Charles, Dybas and Mansfield2014) and can be enhanced by serial passage (Bell et al., Reference Bell, St Charles, Murphy, Rathinam, Plovanich-Jones, Stanley, Wolf, Gettings, Whittam and Mansfield2009), by depleting the microbiota with antibiotics (O'Loughlin et al., Reference O'Loughlin, Samuelson, Braundmeier-Fleming, White, Haldorson, Stone, Lessmann, Eucker and Konkel2015), or by infecting gnotobiotic animals (Chang and Miller, Reference Chang and Miller2006). Recent studies have also shown that C. jejuni-mediated-autoimmunity is also enhanced under the environmental conditions employed in these models especially by depleting gut microbial communities with antibiotics (Brooks et al., unpublished; (St Charles et al., Reference St Charles, Bell, Gadsden, Malik, Cooke, Van de Grift, Kim, Smith and Mansfield2017).

The ability of commensal microbiota to prevent colonization by exogenous pathogens or opportunistic commensals has been termed “colonization resistance.” Considerable recent work has been aimed at enhancing colonization resistance using anti-Campylobacter compounds including, probiotics, bacteriophages, vaccines, and anti-Campylobacter bacteriocins, all of which may be successful at reducing cfu loads in poultry (Johnson et al., Reference Johnson, Shank and Johnson2017). Phenolic compounds have also been tested producing significant but variable activities against AR and susceptible C. jejuni strains (Klancnik et al., Reference Klancnik, Mozina and Zhang2012). Interestingly, some phenolic compounds significantly reduced the expression of the CmeABC efflux pump imparting enhanced sensitivity to antibiotics (Oh and Jeon, Reference Oh and Jeon2015). Many other natural compounds from plants and other organisms are under study for inhibiting C. jejuni colonization. More basic work is needed to understand interactions of specific treatments with C. jejuni AR response elements.

Colonization rates for AR and susceptible C. jejuni

Several studies have been conducted to examine the colonization rates of AR versus susceptible C. jejuni. Luo and colleagues examined the effect of fluoroquinolone resistance on colonization and fitness of C. jejuni in the chicken host (Luo et al., Reference Luo, Pereira, Sahin, Lin, Huang, Michel and Zhang2005). They found that both resistance and susceptible C. jejuni had similar colonization levels and persistence in specific pathogen-free White Leghorn chickens when no fluoroquinolone antibiotics were given. However, upon co-inoculation of resistant and susceptible strains in the presence of fluoroquinolone treatment, the resistant isolates outcompeted the majority of the FQ-susceptible strains, showing enhanced fitness. This fitness advantage was the single point mutation in gyrA and was not due to compensatory mutations in the genes targeted by FQ. In a similar competition trial, Luangtongkum et al. (Reference Luangtongkum, Shen, Seng, Sahin, Jeon, Liu and Zhang2012) tested erythromycin resistant and susceptible strains for their ability to colonize and persist in newly hatched broiler chickens. They found that erythromycin susceptible C. jejuni strains repeatedly outcompeted the resistant strains when antibiotics were not used, suggesting that macrolide-resistant strains will likely decrease in the absence of antibiotic selection pressure. Clearly, more information is needed to understand colonization resistance mechanisms in relation to AR C. jejuni strains.

Persistent C. jejuni colonization results in inflammation

Studies to understand colonization factors for C. jejuni have been done mainly in chickens because of its importance as a reservoir for human infection, yet chickens are not known to progress from colonization to disease as occurs in human beings. Thus, mouse models have been employed to study inflammation after C. jejuni colonization. Limited enteric flora (LF) C3H severe combined immune deficient (SCID) mice infected with C. jejuni displayed high-level C. jejuni colonization for up 224 days. In contrast, immune competent congenic LF C3H mice began to clear the bacteria at approximately 28 days (Chang and Miller, Reference Chang and Miller2006). LF C3H SCID mice, but not LF C3H immune competent mice, displayed inflammation of the cecum and the colon (Chang and Miller, Reference Chang and Miller2006), suggesting that inflammation may allow C. jejuni to persist in the gut. This explanation would be consistent with experimental data from other pathogens including Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (Winter et al., Reference Winter, Thiennimitr, Winter, Butler, Huseby, Crawford, Russell, Bevins, Adams, Tsolis, Roth and Bäumler2010) and some pathogenic Escherichia coli (Horwitz and Silverstein, Reference Horwitz and Silverstein1980) that have evolved mechanisms to exploit inflammation by utilizing tetrathionate and evading complement fixation, respectively. In general, two hypotheses exist to explain how enteric pathogens may benefit from inflammation: (1) inflammation alters microbiota structure in a way that frees up nutrients that are exploited by pathogens but not the microbiota (i.e. food hypothesis) and (2) changes in antimicrobial compounds produced by the inflamed tissue may be detrimental to the microbiota but not the pathogen (i.e. differential killing hypothesis) (Stecher and Hardt, Reference Stecher and Hardt2008).

Dysbiosis and susceptibility to pathogens such as C. jejuni

Dysbiosis is a term used to describe microbial communities that are depleted of beneficial bacteria; such depletion is associated with increased susceptibility to both pathogen-mediated and non-pathogen associated diseases. Dysbiosis may result from immune deficiencies, changes in diet, antibiotic treatment, and acute inflammation (Honda and Littman, Reference Honda and Littman2012). One consequence of dysbiosis in people and animals includes diminished pathogen colonization resistance (Buffie and Pamer, Reference Buffie and Pamer2013). When compared with healthy individuals, dysbiosis has been found in patients with various chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), multiple sclerosis, and Type 1 diabetes (Ercolini and Miller, Reference Ercolini and Miller2009). In some cases, these diseases have direct links to pathogenic organisms; however, others are associated with fluctuations in the abundance of particular commensal microorganisms (Shimon, Reference Shimon2000; Ercolini and Miller, Reference Ercolini and Miller2009; Chervonsky, Reference Chervonsky2013). Obligate anaerobes likely play a critical role in colonization resistance to pathogens. Depletion of these organisms may free up nutrients for fast growing organisms including Proteobacteria (van der Waaij et al., Reference van der Waaij, Berghuis-de Vries and Lekkerkerk-van der Wees1971, Reference van der Waaij, Berghuis-de Vries and Lekkerkerk-van der Wees1972; Wells et al., Reference Wells, Maddaus, Jechorek and Simmons1988; Shin et al., Reference Shin, Suzuki and Morishita2002). To evaluate the role of the microbiota in pathogen-associated diseases, germfree, gnotobiotic, and antibiotic-depleted microbiota mice have been experimentally infected and some are described in the following sections. It is well established that dysbiosis can enhance susceptibility to pathogens, increasing the likelihood of disease in the host following infection with S. Typhimurium, E. coli, and C. jejuni.

Microbiota mediated colonization resistance

Early attempts to develop a murine model of C. jejuni colonization and colitis were retarded by an inability to colonize wild-type (WT) mice with C. jejuni or low-level C. jejuni colonization with subclinical disease (Chang and Miller, Reference Chang and Miller2006; O'Loughlin et al., Reference O'Loughlin, Samuelson, Braundmeier-Fleming, White, Haldorson, Stone, Lessmann, Eucker and Konkel2015). C. jejuni colonization resistance was abolished by infecting gnotobiotic mice; and persistent, high-level C. jejuni colonization was achieved by infecting immune deficient gnotobiotic mice (Chang and Miller, Reference Chang and Miller2006). Along with persistent C. jejuni colonization, immune deficient (i.e. SCID) gnotobiotic mice had marked inflammation of the cecum, colon, and stomach (Chang and Miller, Reference Chang and Miller2006). Other reports showed that both specific pathogen-free (SPF) C57BL/6 wild-type and congenic C57BL/6 interleukin-10 deficient (IL-10−/−) mice were colonized by C. jejuni, but only IL-10−/− mice were susceptible to colitis after infection with C. jejuni 11168 (Mansfield et al., Reference Mansfield, Bell, Wilson, Murphy, Elsheikha, Rathinam, Fierro, Linz and Young2007, Reference Mansfield, Patterson, Fierro, Murphy, Rathinam, Kopper, Barbu, Onifade and Bell2008a). In this work, it was also shown that presence of Helicobacter hepaticus or related mouse pathogens conferred immunological resistance to colonization with C. jejuni strains. The C57BL/6 IL-10−/− mouse model has also been used to determine if the microbiota plays a critical role in the inflammation seen in C. jejuni-infected C57BL/6 IL-10−/− mice.

Shifts in microbiota enhance colonization of C. jejuni

Inoculation of mice with human fecal material has been used to generate humanized microbiota mice (Humicrobiota). In one model, Humicrobiota mice were generated by using a five-antibiotic cocktail (ampicillin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, and metronidazole) to deplete the microbiota, followed by inoculation with either murine or human feces. Per oral C. jejuni infection of these mice resulted in clearance of C. jejuni in 2 days by murine microbiota mice. In contrast, mice with human microbiota remained colonized for 6 weeks and displayed exacerbated T cell, B cell, and pro-inflammatory cytokine responses in the colonic mucosa (Bereswill et al., Reference Bereswill, Fischer, Plickert, Haag, Otto, Kühl, Dasti, Zautner, Muñoz, Loddenkemper, Gross, Göbel and Heimesaat2011). However, murine microbiota controls were also pre-treated with antibiotics thus raising the question of whether this affected their immune responses.

Transplanted human fecal microbiota from young adults (Humicrobiota) altered immune responses to C. jejuni infection in C57BL/6 mice when compared with congenic mice with conventional mouse microbiota (Convmicrobiota) (Brooks et al., Reference Brooks, Brakel, Bell, Bejcek, Gilpin, Brudvig and Mansfield2017). Humicrobiota and Convmicrobiota mice had statistically significant differences between their microbial communities, although alpha diversity indices showed no differences in diversity between experimental groups. C57BL/6 mice carrying a stable Humicrobiota and experimentally infected with C. jejuni strains from a colitis patient and a GBS patient had higher C. jejuni colonization levels and colonic inflammation scores than congenic mice with Convmicrobiota. C. jejuni 11168, but not 260.94, elicited TH1- and TH17-associated anti-C. jejuni antibody responses. Notably, Humicrobiota mice displayed a TH2 biased anti-C. jejuni antibody response independent of inoculation status. Finally, Humicrobiota mice infected with both C. jejuni patient strains had elevated GM1 anti-ganglioside antibody responses, but only those given strain 260.94 were significantly higher than conventional microbiota mice given the same strain. These data demonstrate that human microbiota alters host–pathogen interactions in infected mice increasing colonization and autoimmune responses in a C. jejuni strain-dependent manner. Thus, particular microbiota compositions are likely to enhance host susceptibility to GBS following C. jejuni infection.

Disease associated with C. jejuni: hemorrhagic gastroenteritis and IBD in human beings

C. jejuni causes a spectrum of diseases in people with some individuals colonized but asymptomatic. However, most patients ingesting C. jejuni in undercooked meat or unpasteurized milk develop mild-to-severe gastroenteritis targeting the colon, which is debilitating but self-limiting within 7–10 days (Vandenberg et al., Reference Vandenberg, Cornelius, Souayah, Martiny, Vlaes, Brandt and On2013). Lesions include colonic crypt distortion, crypt abscesses, mucin depletion, edema of the colonic lamina propria, and significant infiltration of granulocytes and mononuclear cells (Young and Mansfield, Reference Young, Mansfield, Ketley and Konkel2005). Infection initiated in the GI tract can become extra-intestinal, particularly in immune-compromised hosts (Karmali and Fleming, Reference Karmali and Fleming1979; Blaser et al., Reference Blaser, Glass, Hug, Stoll, Kibrya and Alim1980; Ketley et al., Reference Ketley, Guerry, Panigrahi, Newell, Ketley and Feldman1996). Damage resolves in most patients, but campylobacteriosis can be life-threatening in immune-compromised or HIV-infected people with persistence, systemic spread, and multi-organ damage (Young and Mansfield, Reference Young, Mansfield, Ketley and Konkel2005; Fernandez-Cruz et al., Reference Fernandez-Cruz, Munoz, Mohedano, Valerio, Marin, Alcala, Rodriguez-Creixems, Cercenado and Bouza2010). Based on CDC data, these infections are more likely to lead to death (CDC, 2011). AR C. jejuni have been suggested to cause more severe infections requiring lengthier hospitalizations when compared with susceptible infections (Moore et al., Reference Moore, Barton, Blair, Corcoran, Dooley, Fanning, Kempf, Lastovica, Lowery, Matsuda, McDowell, McMahon, Millar, Rao, Rooney, Seal, Snelling and Tolba2006) and, thus, represent an important public health concern. Macrolides and fluoroquinolones are the antibiotics of choice for treating C. jejuni infections, while tetracyclines are sometimes considered as alternatives to these drugs but are rarely used. In cases of bacteremia or multi-organ infection, intravenous amino glycosides are often used. Based on the rising incidence of resistance to these drugs, Danish scientists compared adverse health events associated with susceptible and AR C. jejuni infection in 3471 patients (Moore et al., Reference Moore, Barton, Blair, Corcoran, Dooley, Fanning, Kempf, Lastovica, Lowery, Matsuda, McDowell, McMahon, Millar, Rao, Rooney, Seal, Snelling and Tolba2006). Patients with quinolone-resistant strains had a 9.68-fold increased risk of adverse events within 30 days, while patients with erythromycin-resistant strains had a 5.51-fold risk of an adverse event within 90 days when compared with patients with susceptible strains of C. jejuni. More work is needed to understand whether this enhanced disease is due to AR alone or whether virulence attributes of these strains are enhanced in some other manner such as selection compounded by dysbiosis. Given the rising incidence of AR C. jejuni in people and animals, this is a key question to address keeping in mind that multiple interactions may be at work.

The inflammatory nature of Campylobacter enteritis, along with compatible endoscopic or histopathologic findings, can produce a clinical picture that resembles IBD (Farmer, Reference Farmer1990; Perkins and Newstead, Reference Perkins and Newstead1994). Fecal erythrocytes and leukocytes are present in the majority of campylobacteriosis cases whether or not the stools are grossly bloody. In several studies, investigators have shown that acute C. jejuni gastroenteritis is followed by an increased risk for IBD (Garcia Rodriguez et al., Reference Garcia Rodriguez, Ruigomez and Panes2006) (Ternhag et al., Reference Ternhag, Torner, Svensson, Ekdahl and Giesecke2008). Other closely related strains such as Campylobacter concisus have also been linked to the development of IBD (Hold et al., Reference Hold, Smith, Grange, Watt, El-Omar and Mukhopadhya2014).

T helper-1 based inflammation is associated with C. jejuni-induced hemorrhagic colitis

IL-10 is classified as an anti-inflammatory cytokine that downregulates host response to invasion by intracellular pathogens by inhibiting several key inflammatory regulators, including major histocompatibility complex II and T-cell co-stimulatory factors B7-1 and B7-2, and expression of interferon (IFNγ) (Moore et al., Reference Moore, Malefyt, Coffman and O'Garra2001; Ouyang et al., Reference Ouyang, Rutz, Crellin, Valdez and Hymowitz2011). Congenic C57BL/6 IL-10 deficient mice (C57BL/6 IL-10−/−) but not their IL-10+/+ counterparts were susceptible to colitis when infected by C. jejuni 11168 (Mansfield et al., Reference Mansfield, Bell, Wilson, Murphy, Elsheikha, Rathinam, Fierro, Linz and Young2007). C. jejuni 11168 successfully colonized the GI tract of C57BL/6 WT and IL-10−/− mice; however, only IL-10−/− mice developed inflammation of the colon and cecum. The cecum was the GI site with the highest level of colonization; and C. jejuni was isolated from most GI compartments (i.e. cecum, stomach, colon, and jejunum) or detected by C. jejuni specific (gyrA) PCR of tissue homogenates. All mice were colonized at comparable levels and colonization was necessary but not sufficient for GI lesions as only IL-10−/− mice developed disease and lesions (Mansfield et al., Reference Mansfield, Bell, Wilson, Murphy, Elsheikha, Rathinam, Fierro, Linz and Young2007).

Colitis in IL-10−/− mice was C. jejuni strain dependent (Bell et al., Reference Bell, Jerome, Plovanich-Jones, Smith, Gettings, Kim, Landgraf, Lefébure, Kopper, Rathinam, Charles, Buffa, Brooks, Poe, Eaton, Stanhope and Mansfield2013a; Malik et al., Reference Malik, Sharma, St Charles, Dybas and Mansfield2014), and genomic composition of the C. jejuni strain was an important factor in determining the disease outcome (Bell et al., Reference Bell, Jerome, Plovanich-Jones, Smith, Gettings, Kim, Landgraf, Lefébure, Kopper, Rathinam, Charles, Buffa, Brooks, Poe, Eaton, Stanhope and Mansfield2013a). To date the entire suite of genes required for C. jejuni colitis remains unknown; however, comparative genomics of available C. jejuni genomes and gene expression analysis of C. jejuni strains that caused colitis in C57BL/6 IL-10−/− mice compared with those that did not yield 201 potential virulence genes, collectively called the C. jejuni virulome (Bell et al., Reference Bell, Jerome, Plovanich-Jones, Smith, Gettings, Kim, Landgraf, Lefébure, Kopper, Rathinam, Charles, Buffa, Brooks, Poe, Eaton, Stanhope and Mansfield2013a). Motility is a major determinant of C. jejuni pathogenesis. C. jejuni diminished motility and non-motile mutants colonized at rates 100 to 1000-fold less than the WT (Wassenaar et al., Reference Wassenaar, Zeijst, Ayling and Newell1993) thus variation in motility amongst strains played a role in infection outcomes. Further, an experiment in C. jejuni 11168-infected germ-free C57BL/6 mice showed that expression levels of 90 open reading frames (ORFs) were significantly up- or down-regulated in the mouse cecum at least 2-fold compared with in vitro growth (Bell et al., Reference Bell, Jerome, Plovanich-Jones, Smith, Gettings, Kim, Landgraf, Lefebure, Kopper, Rathinam, St Charles, Buffa, Brooks, Poe, Eaton, Stanhope and Mansfield2013b). Genomic content of these ninety C. jejuni 11168 ORFs was significantly correlated with the capacity to colonize and cause enteritis in mice. Differences in gene expression levels and patterns are thus an important determinant of pathotype in C. jejuni strains in this mouse model and more work is needed to reveal the function of many of these virulence factors.

Mouse C. jejuni disease models have demonstrated that most strains are invasive and elicit strong inflammatory responses particularly in the colon (Chang and Miller, Reference Chang and Miller2006; Mansfield et al., Reference Mansfield, Bell, Wilson, Murphy, Elsheikha, Rathinam, Fierro, Linz and Young2007; Reference Mansfield, Patterson, Fierro, Murphy, Rathinam, Kopper, Barbu, Onifade and Bell2008a). Many C. jejuni strains causing disease in these models have cytolethal distending toxin and produce effacing lesions that would be expected to release many self-antigens (Pickett et al., Reference Pickett, Pesci, Cottle, Russell, Erdem and Zeytin1996; Mansfield et al., Reference Mansfield, Bell, Wilson, Murphy, Elsheikha, Rathinam, Fierro, Linz and Young2007, Reference Mansfield, Patterson, Fierro, Murphy, Rathinam, Kopper, Barbu, Onifade and Bell2008a). Upon invasion, most C. jejuni strains are captured and processed by DCs in the lamina propria (Rathinam et al., Reference Rathinam, Hoag and Mansfield2008, Reference Rathinam, Appledorn, Hoag, Amalfitano and Mansfield2009). BM-DCs challenged with C. jejuni efficiently internalized and killed C. jejuni 11168 and significantly upregulated surface MHC-II, CD40, CD80 and CD86 demonstrating a mature phenotype. Infected BM-DCs secreted significant amounts of TNFα, IL-6 and IL-12p70. Maximal activation of murine BM-DCs required internalization of C. jejuni; attachment alone was not sufficient to elicit significant responses. Also, various strains of C. jejuni elicited different magnitudes of cytokine production from BM-DCs. TLR2, TLR4, MyD88, and TRIF also played a role in C. jejuni-induced inflammatory activation of murine DCs (Rathinam et al., Reference Rathinam, Appledorn, Hoag, Amalfitano and Mansfield2009). DC upregulation of MHC-II and costimulatory molecules after C. jejuni challenge was profoundly impaired by TLR2, TLR4, MyD88, and TRIF deficiencies. Similarly, C. jejuni-induced secretion of IL-12, IL-6, and TNFα was significantly inhibited in TLR2−/−, TLR4−/−, MyD88−/−, and TRIF−/− DCs compared with WT DCs. Furthermore, C. jejuni infection induced IRF-3 phosphorylation and IFN-β secretion by DCs in a TLR4-TRIF dependent fashion, further demonstrating activation of this pathway by C. jejuni. Importantly, TLR4, MyD88, and TRIF deficiencies markedly impaired Th1-priming ability of C. jejuni-infected DCs. These results showed that C. jejuni-induced signaling through TLR4-MyD88 and TLR4-TRIF axes mediated maturation and inflammatory responses of DCs. Finally, in a coculture system, C. jejuni -infected BM-DCs induced high-level IFNγ production from CD4 + T cells indicating Th1 polarization. This finding correlates with in vivo studies demonstrating Th1-associated IgG2b antibody responses in IL-10+/+ and IL-10−/− mice of C57BL/6 (Mansfield et al., Reference Mansfield, Bell, Wilson, Murphy, Elsheikha, Rathinam, Fierro, Linz and Young2007), C3H and non-obese diabetic (NOD) genetic backgrounds (Mansfield et al., Reference Mansfield, Patterson, Fierro, Murphy, Rathinam, Kopper, Barbu, Onifade and Bell2008a) and in C57BL/129 mice (Fox et al., Reference Fox, Rogers, Whary, Ge, Taylor, Xu, Horwitz and Erdman2004) challenged orally with C. jejuni. However, excessive innate or T-cell mediated inflammatory responses in the intestine triggered by DCs in the absence of immunoregulatory elements, like IL-10, contribute to immune pathology as evident in the C57BL/6 IL-10−/− enteritis model with lesions indistinguishable from human Crohn's disease patients (Mansfield et al., Reference Mansfield, Bell, Wilson, Murphy, Elsheikha, Rathinam, Fierro, Linz and Young2007, Reference Mansfield, Patterson, Fierro, Murphy, Rathinam, Kopper, Barbu, Onifade and Bell2008a; Bell et al., Reference Bell, St Charles, Murphy, Rathinam, Plovanich-Jones, Stanley, Wolf, Gettings, Whittam and Mansfield2009).

Humphrey et al., infected four commercial breeds of broiler chickens with C. jejuni M1 strain and demonstrated that some chickens experience disease and inflammation (Humphrey et al., Reference Humphrey, Chaloner, Kemmett, Davidson, Williams, Kipar, Humphrey and Wigley2014). Infected birds of all four breeds mounted an innate immune response similar to that seen in mammals, which was controlled in most breeds by upregulation of IL-10. Prolonged inflammatory responses were seen in one chicken breed along with diarrhea and GI lesions. Despite this large body of experimental infection studies in animals including chickens, little is known about whether AR C. jejuni strains elicit enhanced inflammatory responses post infection.

Disease associated with C. jejuni: GBS and autoimmunity in humans

C. jejuni has also been linked to the peripheral neuropathies, GBS and Miller Fisher Syndrome, as well as IBD, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and reactive arthritis (RA). All are significant autoimmune conditions associated with recent Campylobacter infection with GBS considered the leading cause of acute neuromuscular paralysis worldwide (Willison and Plomp, Reference Willison and Plomp2008). A recent meta-analysis by Keithlin et al. (Keithlin et al., Reference Keithlin, Sargeant, Thomas and Fazil2014) estimated the incidence of GBS following C. jejuni infection to be 7 per 10,000, while rates of IBS and RA were higher at 40 per 1000, and 28.6 per 1000, respectively. Tam et al. (Reference Tam, O'Brien, Petersen, Islam, Hayward and Rodrigues2007) have estimated an excess risk of 60% for development of GBS following C. jejuni infection in the UK (Tam et al., Reference Tam, O'Brien, Petersen, Islam, Hayward and Rodrigues2007). In June 2011, 26 patients in the southwestern USA were stricken with GBS after ingesting C. jejuni-contaminated water, showing that these sequelae can also occur in outbreaks (Jackson et al., Reference Jackson, Zegarra, Lopez-Gatell, Sejvar, Arzate, Waterman, Nunez, Lopez, Weiss, Cruz, Murrieta, Luna-Gierke, Heiman, Vieira, Fitzgerald, Kwan, Zarate-Bermudez, Talkington, Hill and Mahon2014). Yet, no prior studies have determined whether AR C. jejuni strains or AR or susceptible strains from animals are more likely to result in GBS and other long-term sequelae relative to susceptible strains.

Several forms of GBS are recognized, but the most common form occurring after C. jejuni infection is acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) where damage to motor neurons occurs at the nodes of Ranvier. Acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) can follow after AMAN leading to acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (Oh et al., Reference Oh, LaGanke and Claussen2001). C. jejuni infection is well known to precede the AMAN form of GBS when bacterial LOS mimics host nerve gangliosides, induces autoantibody production and causes subsequent nerve damage. This molecular mimicry between C. jejuni LOS structures and gangliosides found in the membranes of peripheral nerve cells is the hypothesized mechanism for GBS (van den Berg et al., Reference van den Berg, Walgaard, Drenthen, Fokke, Jacobs and van Doorn2014). Upon infection lipooligosaccharides on the C. jejuni outer membrane elicit the production of antibodies that cross-react with gangliosides, such as GM1 and GD1a on peripheral nerves (van den Berg et al., Reference van den Berg, Walgaard, Drenthen, Fokke, Jacobs and van Doorn2014; St Charles et al., Reference St Charles, Bell, Gadsden, Malik, Cooke, Van de Grift, Kim, Smith and Mansfield2017). In human beings and other mammals, gangliosides located at or near the node of Ranvier on peripheral nerves are the target for these cross-reactive antibodies. Once these antibodies bind to the axolemma at the node, complement binds, a membrane attack complex forms, and this transmembrane channel leads to the disappearance of voltage-gated sodium channels. Subsequently, this can lead to detachment of paranodal myelin, nerve conduction failure and in some cases Wallerian degeneration (McGonigal et al., Reference McGonigal, Rowan, Greenshields, Halstead, Humphreys, Rother, Furukawa and Willison2010). Thereafter, macrophages are called in to remove myelin and axonal debris can cause more damage, but this cleanup improves the process of tissue repair (Martini and Willison, Reference Martini and Willison2016). Kaida and Kusunoki (Reference Kaida and Kusunoki2010) have associated several C. jejuni-associated neurological syndromes with antibodies to gangliosides GM1, GD1a, GT1a, and GQ1b (Kaida and Kusunoki, Reference Kaida and Kusunoki2010). In one study (Nachamkin et al., Reference Nachamkin, Liu, Li, Ung, Moran, Prendergast and Sheikh2002), C. jejuni strains associated with GBS cases had a high likelihood of having LOS resembling ganglioside GD1a, which is plentiful in the peripheral nervous system of human beings and mice (Lehmann et al., Reference Lehmann, Lopez, Zhang, Ngyuen, Zhang, Kieseier, Mori and Sheikh2007). Identity between C. jejuni LOS variants and seven different gangliosides has been demonstrated (Gilbert et al., Reference Gilbert, Karwaski, Bernatchez, Young, Taboada, Michniewicz, Cunningham and Wakarchuk2002). Some of these variations in LOS structure have been traced to polymorphisms in particular genes such as cst-II (Koga et al., Reference Koga, Takahashi, Masuda, Hirata and Yuki2005); for example, the role of cst-II was verified when a cst-II knockout strain of C. jejuni was shown to be incapable of evoking anti-ganglioside antibodies in knockout mice that lack the corresponding ganglioside and thus treat it as a foreign antigen (Godschalk et al., Reference Godschalk, Heikema, Gilbert, Komagamine, Ang, Glerum, Brochu, Li, Yuki, Jacobs, van Belkum and Endtz2004).

There is considerable between-strain variation in the branched terminal oligosaccharide portion (‘outer core’) of C. jejuni LOS structure; this variation can be attributed to a variety of genetic mechanisms (Gilbert et al., Reference Gilbert, Karwaski, Bernatchez, Young, Taboada, Michniewicz, Cunningham and Wakarchuk2002), including lateral gene transfer (Gilbert et al., Reference Gilbert, Godschalk, Karwaski, Ang, van Belkum, Li, Wakarchuk and Endtz2004; Phongsisay et al., Reference Phongsisay, Perera and Fry2006) and phase variation (Linton et al., Reference Linton, Gilbert, Hitchen, Dell, Morris, Wakarchuk, Gregson and Wren2000). Phase variation has been shown (1) to occur during human infection (Prendergast et al., Reference Prendergast, Tribble, Baqar, Scott, Ferris, Walker and Moran2004), (2) to alter invasiveness in tissue culture (Guerry et al., Reference Guerry, Szymanski, Prendergast, Hickey, Ewing, Pattarini and Moran2002) and (3) to enhance virulence during infection in mice (Jerome et al., Reference Jerome, Bell, Plovanich-Jones, Barrick, Brown and Mansfield2011). Horizontal gene exchange, which occurs at significant rates in C. jejuni (Suerbaum et al., Reference Suerbaum, Lohrengel, Sonnevend, Ruberg and Kist2001; Fearnhead et al., Reference Fearnhead, Smith, Barrigas, Fox and French2005), has also been implicated in the generation of LOS diversity (Parker et al., Reference Parker, Horn, Gilbert, Miller, Woodward and Mandrell2005; Phongsisay et al., Reference Phongsisay, Perera and Fry2006). Extensive variation has also been demonstrated in the chromosomal region containing genes required for LOS synthesis (Gilbert et al., Reference Gilbert, Karwaski, Bernatchez, Young, Taboada, Michniewicz, Cunningham and Wakarchuk2002; Godschalk et al., Reference Godschalk, Heikema, Gilbert, Komagamine, Ang, Glerum, Brochu, Li, Yuki, Jacobs, van Belkum and Endtz2004; Knudsen et al., Reference Knudsen, Bang, Nielsen and Madsen2005; Parker et al., Reference Parker, Horn, Gilbert, Miller, Woodward and Mandrell2005). To date, five major ‘LOS classes’ have been identified depending on the genetic composition of the complex LOS locus (Parker et al., Reference Parker, Horn, Gilbert, Miller, Woodward and Mandrell2005). Godschalk et al. (Reference Godschalk, Bergman, Gorkink, Simons, van den Braak, Lastovica, Endtz, Verbrugh and van Belkum2006) identified three GBS-associated genetic loci within the LOS region; all three encode galactosyltransferases presumably involved in the synthesis of the terminal oligosaccharide (Godschalk et al., Reference Godschalk, Bergman, Gorkink, Simons, van den Braak, Lastovica, Endtz, Verbrugh and van Belkum2006).

Disease associated with C. jejuni: GBS in animals

Currently, rats and chickens serve as the main animal models of GBS and other peripheral neuropathies. Rats injected with myelin preparations mixed with complete Freund's adjuvant develop neurological disease and lesions. Rats show experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN) after this immunization and exhibit mononuclear cell infiltration and demyelinated nerve fibers in peripheral nerves, e.g. the sciatic nerve (Archelos et al., Reference Archelos, Fortwangler and Hartung1997). Rats with experimental autoimmune polyradiculo-neuropathy and nerve biopsies of GBS patients both had T cells within the epi- and perineurium, expressing a TNFα-converting enzyme likely active in these demyelinating disorders (Kurz et al., Reference Kurz, Pischel, Hartung and Kieseier2005). However, myelin-injected rats do not model the AMAN form of GBS induced by C. jejuni (Nachamkin et al., Reference Nachamkin, Allos and Ho1998). Chickens acquire a form of peripheral neuropathy secondary to C. jejuni inoculation with GBS patient strains (Li et al., Reference Li, Xue, Tian, Liu and Yang1996). In chickens given a C. jejuni Penner serotype O:19 strain orally, 33% of the chickens became paralyzed within 12 days. In paralyzed chickens, early lesions included nodal lengthening and paranodal demyelination that was later followed by Wallerian-like degeneration and even paranodal re-myelination in some long-term survivors. Thus, chickens inoculated orally with GBS associated C. jejuni strains from patients can be considered a naturally occurring disease model for GBS. Work with patient samples, using rats and chickens, has helped to test the molecular mimicry hypothesis between C. jejuni LOS and peripheral nerve gangliosides as a mechanism for anti-ganglioside antibody induction.

C. jejuni strains from patients with GBS can produce neurological disease in mice after a single oral infection allowing the mechanisms controlling this type of autoimmunity to be studied in these models (Malik et al., Reference Malik, Sharma, St Charles, Dybas and Mansfield2014; St Charles et al., Reference St Charles, Bell, Gadsden, Malik, Cooke, Van de Grift, Kim, Smith and Mansfield2017). The main mechanism resulting in peripheral nerve dysfunction is molecular mimicry; some C. jejuni strains with sialylated outer core oligosaccharides that mimic host gangliosides (GM1/GD1a) on the peripheral nerves induced antiganglioside antibodies that attached to and damaged peripheral nerves in experimental trials. This was accompanied by peripheral neurological disease as measured on several phenotyping apparatuses. When the chloramphenicol resistant C. jejuni strain 260.94 was used for experimental infections, chloramphenicol treatment worsened the outcomes and intensified these autoimmune responses (St Charles et al., Reference St Charles, Bell, Gadsden, Malik, Cooke, Van de Grift, Kim, Smith and Mansfield2017). Contrasting T cell responses were produced after C. jejuni infection in C57BL/6 IL-10−/− mice (Malik et al., Reference Malik, Sharma, St Charles, Dybas and Mansfield2014). C. jejuni strains with α−2,3 sialyation in the outer core of the LOS produced Th2 responses and induction of antiganglioside antibodies against the nerves. C. jejuni strains without this branching produced Th1 responses and caused inflammation in the colon. These GBS mouse models are available as test systems to develop new therapeutics and to test the role of AR C. jejuni in driving this autoimmune disease.

Interestingly transplanted human fecal microbiota enhanced GBS autoantibody responses after C. jejuni infection in C57BL/6 mice. Inoculating germ-free C57BL/6 WT mice with a mixed human fecal slurry provided a murine model that stably passed its microbiota over >20 generations. Humicrobiota conferred many changes upon the WT model in contrast to previous results, which showed only colonization with no disease after C. jejuni challenge. When compared with Convmicrobiota mice for susceptibility to C. jejuni enteric or GBS patient strains, infected Humicrobiota mice had (1) 10–100-fold increases in C. jejuni colonization of both strains, (2) pathologic change in draining lymph nodes but not colon or cecal lamina propria, (3) significantly lower Th1/Th17-dependent anti-C. jejuni responses, (4) significantly higher IL-4 responses at 5 but not 7 weeks post infection (PI), (5) significantly higher Th2-dependent anti-C. jejuni responses, and (6) significantly elevated antiganglioside autoantibodies after C. jejuni infection. These responses in Humicrobiota mice were correlated with a dominant Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes microbiota. Thus, this human microbiota also enhanced susceptibility to this autoimmune disease.

C. jejuni strain-dependent differences in disease outcomes

It has been suggested that colitis and GBS disease are C. jejuni strain dependent. Testing of many C. jejuni strains in the same inbred mouse model supports this hypothesis (Bell et al., Reference Bell, St Charles, Murphy, Rathinam, Plovanich-Jones, Stanley, Wolf, Gettings, Whittam and Mansfield2009). All C. jejuni strains did not produce similar disease when tested in mouse models and it has been suggested that the outcomes of hemorrhagic colitis and autoimmunity such as GBS are strain dependent (Malik et al., Reference Malik, Sharma, St Charles, Dybas and Mansfield2014). C57BL/6 IL-10−/− mice infected with isolates from patients with colitis had significantly upregulated type 1 and 17 but not type 2 cytokines in the colon coincident with infiltration of phagocytes, T cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). Both ILC and T cells contributed to the interferon-c, IL-17, and IL-22 upregulation, but in a time- and organ-specific manner. However, T cells were necessary for colitis as mice depleted of Thy-1þ cells were protected while neither Rag1-/- nor IL-10R blocked Rag1-/- mice developed colitis after infection. Depleting IFN-c, IL-17, or both significantly decreased colitis and drove colonic responses toward type 2 cytokine and antibody induction. However, C. jejuni strains from GBS patients induced mild colitis with mixed cytokine profiles associated with blunted type 1/17 but enhanced type 2 responses. It was only the type 2 antibody isotypes that cross-reacted with peripheral nerve gangliosides producing autoimmunity. Thus, contrasting T-cell responses contributed to either colitis or autoimmunity in C57BL/6 IL-10−/− mice (Malik et al., Reference Malik, Sharma, St Charles, Dybas and Mansfield2014). This reflects the roles of Th1 responses in killing intracellular pathogens and of Th2 responses in the induction of autoimmunity (Nurieva and Chung, Reference Nurieva and Chung2010).

Arguments against strict strain dependent disease pathotypes include, (1) varied animal reservoirs such as poultry, swine, cattle, and fecal contaminated water are the most common sources of human infections, and (2) in one outbreak C. jejuni isolates from patients with colitis and GBS were genetically identical. These outcomes may be explained by recognizing that not all C. jejuni strains have ganglioside mimics on their surface, but have other glycans (Nachamkin et al., Reference Nachamkin, Liu, Li, Ung, Moran, Prendergast and Sheikh2002). Moreover, many individuals infected with C. jejuni bearing self-glycans will maintain tolerance and elicit protective responses against other surface molecules of the bacterium (Willison et al., Reference Willison, Jacobs and van Doorn2016), and the mechanisms controlling B-cell tolerance to T-cell-independent antigens are largely unknown.

C. jejuni within-host adaptation can enhance disease

C. jejuni's genome is not static during in vivo passage (Wassenaar et al., Reference Wassenaar, Geilhausen and Newell1998; Nuijten et al., Reference Nuijten, Berg, Formentini, Zeijst and Jacobs2000; de Boer et al., Reference de Boer, Wagenaar, Achterberg, van Putten, Schouls and Duim2002; Jerome et al., Reference Jerome, Bell, Plovanich-Jones, Barrick, Brown and Mansfield2011; Kim et al., Reference Kim, Artymovich, Hall, Smith, Fulton, Bell, Dybas, Mansfield, Tempelman, Wilson and Linz2012; Kivistö et al., Reference Kivistö, Kovanen, Skarp-de Haan, Schott, Rahkio, Rossi and Hänninen2014). A significant proportion of this genomic variation occurs in virulence-associated genes that are involved in the synthesis of antigenic structures including the LOS, flagella, and capsule that are involved in triggering immune responses and potentially aiding in immune evasion (Jerome et al., Reference Jerome, Bell, Plovanich-Jones, Barrick, Brown and Mansfield2011; Kivistö et al., Reference Kivistö, Kovanen, Skarp-de Haan, Schott, Rahkio, Rossi and Hänninen2014). Some genomic variants have direct links to biological outcomes, such as increased motility; thus C. jejuni adaptation does influence infection outcomes.

The first evidence for C. jejuni adaptation in vivo came from variability in pulse-field gel electrophoresis banding patterns following passage in chickens, where analysis of initially clonal isolates of C. jejuni revealed multiple banding patterns in recovered isolates, providing evidence that large-scale genomic rearrangements occurred during in vivo passage (Wassenaar et al., Reference Wassenaar, Geilhausen and Newell1998). Concurrently, Parkhill et al., Reference Parkhill, Wren, Mungall, Ketley, Churcher, Basham, Chillingworth, Davies, Feltwell, Holroyd, Jagels, Karlyshev, Moule, Pallen, Penn, Quail, Rajandream, Rutherford, van Vliet, Whitehead and Barrell2000 identified hypervariable regions in the C. jejuni 11168 genome consisting of homopolymeric tracts of nucleotides (Parkhill et al., Reference Parkhill, Wren, Mungall, Ketley, Churcher, Basham, Chillingworth, Davies, Feltwell, Holroyd, Jagels, Karlyshev, Moule, Pallen, Penn, Quail, Rajandream, Rutherford, van Vliet, Whitehead and Barrell2000). Since this discovery, our laboratory has shown that insertions or deletions in homopolymeric tracts of nucleotides allow C. jejuni 11168 to rapidly adapt during passage in mice (Jerome et al., Reference Jerome, Bell, Plovanich-Jones, Barrick, Brown and Mansfield2011). C. jejuni farm isolates also contained variants in homopolymeric tracts (Kivistö et al., Reference Kivistö, Kovanen, Skarp-de Haan, Schott, Rahkio, Rossi and Hänninen2014). In both cases, the majority of variants in homopolymeric tracts were found in the LOS, capsular, and flagellar genes. Collectively, these homopolymeric tracts were called contingency loci as they have higher rates of mutation than the rest of the genome. Mutations in contingency loci contribute to phase variation: the ability to turn gene expression on or off (Moxon et al., Reference Moxon, Paul, Martin and Richard1994); phase variation may directly impact pathogenesis by altering the expression of virulence factors including LOS, capsule, and flagella (Jerome et al., Reference Jerome, Bell, Plovanich-Jones, Barrick, Brown and Mansfield2011).

Variation in homopolymeric tract length can result in observable biological outcomes. Notably, the passage of C. jejuni in vivo led to the presence of antigenic ganglioside mimics on the LOS of C. jejuni 81–176 that initially lacked any ganglioside mimics (Prendergast et al., Reference Prendergast, Tribble, Baqar, Scott, Ferris, Walker and Moran2004). Site-directed mutagenesis of homopolymeric tracts in the cgtA gene (N-acetyl-galactosaminyl transferase) in C. jejuni 81–176 shifted the ratio of GM2 and GM3 ganglioside mimics and enhanced the invasiveness of the C. jejuni cgtA mutant compared with the WT strain (Guerry et al., Reference Guerry, Szymanski, Prendergast, Hickey, Ewing, Pattarini and Moran2002). The host environmental cues that drive evolutionary selection for phase variation are unknown, but it is known that this process allows for rapid adaptation to novel environments, increased diversity, and evasion of the host immune system (van der Woude and Baumler, Reference van der Woude and Baumler2004; Jerome et al., Reference Jerome, Bell, Plovanich-Jones, Barrick, Brown and Mansfield2011). Slipped-strand mutagenesis (Moxon et al., Reference Moxon, Paul, Martin and Richard1994; Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Aertsen and Michiels2014) and the absence of several homologs of E. coli DNA repair genes contribute to the high incidence of phase variation in C. jejuni (van der Woude and Baumler, Reference van der Woude and Baumler2004). To our knowledge little has been done to understand the role of antibiotic selection on phase variability.

Other mechanisms of C. jejuni adaptation that affects disease

C. jejuni has other mechanisms of adaptation to novel environments in addition to variation in homopolymeric tracts. Several recent studies have demonstrated that single nucleotide variants outside of homopolymeric tracts contribute genetic diversity to C. jejuni strains (Cagliero et al., Reference Cagliero, Cloix, Cloeckaert and Payot2006; Mohawk et al., Reference Mohawk, Poly, Sahl, Rasko and Guerry2014; Thomas et al., Reference Thomas, Lone, Selinger, Taboada, Uwiera, Abbott and Inglis2014). In addition, phenotypic adaptation in C. jejuni has also been observed. In vivo passage conferred increased motility in mice and rabbits (Caldwell et al., Reference Caldwell, Guerry, Lee, Burans and Walker1985; Jones et al., Reference Jones, Marston, Woodall, Maskell, Linton, Karlyshev, Dorrell, Wren and Barrow2004), although this is not surprising because motility is a major factor in C. jejuni colonization (Nachamkin et al., Reference Nachamkin, Yang and Stern1993; Wassenaar et al., Reference Wassenaar, Zeijst, Ayling and Newell1993; Yuki et al., Reference Yuki, Taki, Inagaki, Kasama, Takahashi, Saito, Handa and Miyatake1993). It has also been shown that C. jejuni virulence increases following passage both in similar (Bell et al., Reference Bell, St Charles, Murphy, Rathinam, Plovanich-Jones, Stanley, Wolf, Gettings, Whittam and Mansfield2009) or divergent hosts (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Artymovich, Hall, Smith, Fulton, Bell, Dybas, Mansfield, Tempelman, Wilson and Linz2012), which may result from enhanced colonization potential (up to 10,000-fold increase) (Cawthraw et al., Reference Cawthraw, Wassenaar, Ayling and Newell1996), alterations in virulence-associated gene expression (Bell et al., Reference Bell, Jerome, Plovanich-Jones, Smith, Gettings, Kim, Landgraf, Lefébure, Kopper, Rathinam, Charles, Buffa, Brooks, Poe, Eaton, Stanhope and Mansfield2013a), or the presence of antigenic stimuli based on modifications of surface structures of C. jejuni (Prendergast et al., Reference Prendergast, Tribble, Baqar, Scott, Ferris, Walker and Moran2004). Intragenomic recombination can also occur during passage and even restore motility in non-motile flaA mutants (Nuijten et al., Reference Nuijten, Berg, Formentini, Zeijst and Jacobs2000) or enhance phage resistance (Scott et al., Reference Scott, Timms, Connerton, Loc Carrillo, Adzfa Radzum and Connerton2007). Intergenomic recombination is possible, but current data are limited to recombination between C. jejuni strains with highly similar gene content (de Boer et al., Reference de Boer, Wagenaar, Achterberg, van Putten, Schouls and Duim2002). Together, these results confirm the plasticity of the C. jejuni genome while establishing that adaptation of C. jejuni often affects loci with the potential to modulate host immune responses.

Conclusions

These results from people and animals infected with C. jejuni demonstrate that there are many factors affecting the development of the disease. They also show the spectrum of diseases produced by C. jejuni strains and the plasticity of C. jejuni strains initiating these outcomes. Furthermore, the gut microbiome plays an important role in enhancing colonization resistance to C. jejuni. It appears that AR C. jejuni may cause more severe disease, but this must be confirmed and the mechanisms delineated to fully understand the risks associated with this growing problem. More work is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying these interacting factors resulting in C. jejuni disease.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Dr. Julia Bell and Dr. Jean Brudvig for critical review of the manuscript.

References

Allos, BM (2001). Campylobacter jejuni infections: update on emerging issues and trends. Clinical Infectious Diseases 32: 12011206.Google Scholar
Almofti, YA, Dai, M, Sun, Y, Hao, H, Liu, Z, Cheng, G and Yuan, Z (2011). The physiologic and phenotypic alterations due to macrolide exposure in Campylobacter jejuni. International Journal of Food Microbiology 151: 5261.Google Scholar
Altekruse, SF, Stern, NJ, Fields, PI and Swerdlow, DL (1999). Campylobacter jejuni--an emerging foodborne pathogen. Emerging Infectious Diseases 5: 2835.Google Scholar
Amar, C, Kittl, S, Spreng, D, Thomann, A, Korczak, BM, Burnens, AP and Kuhnert, P (2014). Genotypes and antibiotic resistance of canine Campylobacter jejuni isolates. Veterinary Microbiology 168: 124130.Google Scholar
Archelos, JJ, Fortwangler, T and Hartung, HP (1997). Attenuation of experimental autoimmune neuritis in the Lewis rat by treatment with an antibody to L-selectin. Neuroscience Letters 235: 912.Google Scholar
Bell, JA, St Charles, JL, Murphy, AJ, Rathinam, VA, Plovanich-Jones, AE, Stanley, EL, Wolf, JE, Gettings, JR, Whittam, TS and Mansfield, LS (2009). Multiple factors interact to produce responses resembling spectrum of human disease in Campylobacter jejuni infected C57BL/6 IL-10-/- mice. BMC Microbiology 9: 57.Google Scholar
Bell, JA, Jerome, JP, Plovanich-Jones, AE, Smith, EJ, Gettings, JR, Kim, HY, Landgraf, JR, Lefébure, T, Kopper, JJ, Rathinam, VA, Charles, JLS, Buffa, BA, Brooks, AP, Poe, SA, Eaton, KA, Stanhope, MJ and Mansfield, LS (2013a). Outcome of infection of C57BL/6 IL-10−/− mice with Campylobacter jejuni strains is correlated with genome content of open reading frames up- and down-regulated in vivo. Microbial Pathogenesis 54: 119.Google Scholar
Bell, JA, Jerome, JP, Plovanich-Jones, AE, Smith, EJ, Gettings, JR, Kim, HY, Landgraf, JR, Lefebure, T, Kopper, JJ, Rathinam, VA, St Charles, JL, Buffa, BA, Brooks, AP, Poe, SA, Eaton, KA, Stanhope, MJ and Mansfield, LS (2013b). Outcome of infection of C57BL/6 IL-10(−/−) mice with Campylobacter jejuni strains is correlated with genome content of open reading frames up- and down-regulated in vivo. Microbial Pathogenesis 54: 119.Google Scholar
Bereswill, S, Fischer, A, Plickert, R, Haag, LM, Otto, B, Kühl, AA, Dasti, JI, Zautner, AE, Muñoz, M, Loddenkemper, C, Gross, U, Göbel, UB and Heimesaat, MM (2011). Novel murine infection models provide deep insights into the “ménage à trois” of Campylobacter jejuni, microbiota and host innate immunity. PLoS ONE 6: e20953.Google Scholar
Blaser, MJ, Glass, RI, Hug, MI, Stoll, B, Kibrya, GM and Alim, ARMA (1980). Isolation of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni from Bangladeshi children. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 12: 744747.Google Scholar
Bopp, DJ, Sauders, BD, Waring, AL, Ackelsberg, J, Dumas, N, Braun-Howland, E, Dziewulski, D, Wallace, BJ, Kelly, M, Halse, T, Musser, KA, Smith, PF, Morse, DL and Limberger, RJ (2003). Detection, isolation, and molecular subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Campylobacter jejuni associated with a large waterborne outbreak. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41: 174180.Google Scholar
Brooks, PT, Brakel, KA, Bell, JA, Bejcek, CE, Gilpin, T, Brudvig, JM and Mansfield, LS (2017). Transplanted human fecal microbiota enhanced Guillain Barre syndrome autoantibody responses after Campylobacter jejuni infection in C57BL/6 mice. Microbiome 5: 92.Google Scholar
Bruce, D, Zochowski, W and Fleming, GA (1980). Campylobacter infections in cats and dogs. The Veterinary Record 107: 200201.Google Scholar
Buffie, CG and Pamer, EG (2013). Microbiota-mediated colonization resistance against intestinal pathogens. Nature Reviews Immunology 13: 790801.Google Scholar
Cagliero, C, Cloix, L, Cloeckaert, A and Payot, S (2006). High genetic variation in the multidrug transporter cmeB gene in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 58: 168172.Google Scholar
Caldwell, MB, Guerry, P, Lee, EC, Burans, JP and Walker, RI (1985). Reversible expression of flagella in Campylobacter jejuni. Infection and Immunity 50: 941943.Google Scholar
Cawthraw, SA, Wassenaar, TM, Ayling, R and Newell, DG (1996). Increased colonization potential of Campylobacter jejuni strain 81116 after passage through chickens and its implication on the rate of transmission within flocks. Epidemiology and Infection 117: 213215.Google Scholar
Cawthraw, SA, Feldman, RA, Sayers, AR and Newell, DG (2002). Long-term antibody responses following human infection with Campylobacter jejuni. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 130: 101106.Google Scholar
CDC (2011). Vital signs: incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food--foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 U.S. Sites, 1996–2010. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 60: 749755.Google Scholar
CDC (2013). Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013. Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (ed.). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, pp. 1114.Google Scholar
CDC (2017). National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) Now: Human Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, C.Google Scholar
Cha, W, Mosci, RE, Wengert, SL, Venegas Vargas, C, Rust, SR, Bartlett, PC, Grooms, DL and Manning, SD (2017). Comparing the genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Campylobacter jejuni recovered from cattle and humans. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 818.Google Scholar
Chaban, B, Ngeleka, M and Hill, JE (2010). Detection and quantification of 14 Campylobacter species in pet dogs reveals an increase in species richness in feces of diarrheic animals. BMC Microbiology 10: 73.Google Scholar
Chang, C and Miller, JF (2006). Campylobacter jejuni colonization of mice with limited enteric flora. Infection and Immunity 74: 52615271.Google Scholar
Chervonsky, AV (2013). Microbiota and autoimmunity. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 5: a007294.Google Scholar
de Boer, P, Wagenaar, JA, Achterberg, RP, van Putten, JP, Schouls, LM and Duim, B (2002). Generation of Campylobacter jejuni genetic diversity in vivo. Molecular Microbiology 44: 351359.Google Scholar
Ercolini, AM and Miller, SD (2009). The role of infections in autoimmune disease. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 155: 115.Google Scholar
Farmer, RG (1990). Infectious causes of diarrhea in the differential diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. The Medical Clinics of North America 74: 2938.Google Scholar
FDA (2014). FDA Releases 2014 NARMS Integrated Report; Finds Measurable Improvements in Antimicrobial Resistance Levels. Medicine, C.f.V. (ed.). Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
Fearnhead, P, Smith, NG, Barrigas, M, Fox, A and French, N (2005). Analysis of recombination in Campylobacter jejuni from MLST population data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 61: 333340.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cruz, A, Munoz, P, Mohedano, R, Valerio, M, Marin, M, Alcala, L, Rodriguez-Creixems, M, Cercenado, E and Bouza, E (2010). Campylobacter bacteremia: clinical characteristics, incidence, and outcome over 23 years. Medicine 89: 319330.Google Scholar
Fitzgeorge, RB, Baskerville, A and Lander, KP (1981). Experimental infection of rhesus monkeys with a human strain of Campylobacter jejuni. The Journal of Hygiene 86: 343351.Google Scholar
Fox, JG (1992). In vivo models of enteric campylobacteriosis: natural and experimental infections. In: Nachamkin, I, Blaser, MJ, Tompkins, LS (eds) Campylobacter Jejuni: Current Status and Future Trends. Washington, DC: ASM Press, pp. 131138.Google Scholar
Fox, JG, Moore, R and Ackerman, JI (1983). Campylobacter-Jejuni-Associated diarrhea in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 183: 14301433.Google Scholar
Fox, JG, Rogers, AB, Whary, MT, Ge, Z, Taylor, NS, Xu, S, Horwitz, BH and Erdman, SE (2004). Gastroenteritis in NF-kappaB-deficient mice is produced with wild-type Camplyobacter jejuni but not with C. jejuni lacking cytolethal distending toxin despite persistent colonization with both strains. Infection and Immunity 72: 11161125.Google Scholar
Garcia Rodriguez, LA, Ruigomez, A and Panes, J (2006). Acute gastroenteritis is followed by an increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 130: 15881594.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M, Karwaski, MF, Bernatchez, S, Young, NM, Taboada, E, Michniewicz, J, Cunningham, AM and Wakarchuk, WW (2002). The genetic bases for the variation in the lipo-oligosaccharide of the mucosal pathogen, Campylobacter jejuni. Biosynthesis of sialylated ganglioside mimics in the core oligosaccharide. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277: 327337.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M, Godschalk, PC, Karwaski, MF, Ang, CW, van Belkum, A, Li, J, Wakarchuk, WW and Endtz, HP (2004). Evidence for acquisition of the lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis locus in Campylobacter jejuni GB11, a strain isolated from a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome, by horizontal exchange. Infection and Immunity 72: 11621165.Google Scholar
Godschalk, PC, Heikema, AP, Gilbert, M, Komagamine, T, Ang, CW, Glerum, J, Brochu, D, Li, J, Yuki, N, Jacobs, BC, van Belkum, A and Endtz, HP (2004). The crucial role of Campylobacter jejuni genes in anti-ganglioside antibody induction in Guillain-Barre syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 114: 16591665.Google Scholar
Godschalk, PC, Bergman, MP, Gorkink, RF, Simons, G, van den Braak, N, Lastovica, AJ, Endtz, HP, Verbrugh, HA and van Belkum, A (2006). Identification of DNA sequence variation in Campylobacter jejuni strains associated with the Guillain-Barre syndrome by high-throughput AFLP analysis. BMC Microbiology 6: 32.Google Scholar
Godschalk, PC, Kuijf, ML, Li, J, St Michael, F, Ang, CW, Jacobs, BC, Karwaski, MF, Brochu, D, Moterassed, A, Endtz, HP, van Belkum, A and Gilbert, M (2007). Structural characterization of Campylobacter jejuni lipooligosaccharide outer cores associated with Guillain-Barre and miller fisher syndromes. Infection and Immunity 75: 12451254.Google Scholar
Guerry, P, Szymanski, CM, Prendergast, MM, Hickey, TE, Ewing, CP, Pattarini, DL and Moran, AP (2002). Phase variation of Campylobacter jejuni 81–176 lipooligosaccharide affects ganglioside mimicry and invasiveness in vitro. Infection and Immunity 70: 787793.Google Scholar
Halbert, LW, Kaneene, JB, Linz, J, Mansfield, LS, Wilson, D, Ruegg, PL, Warnick, LD, Wells, SJ, Fossler, CP, Campbell, AM and Geiger-Zwald, AM (2006). Genetic mechanisms contributing to reduced tetracycline susceptibility of campylobacter isolated from organic and conventional dairy farms in the midwestern and northeastern United States. Journal of Food Protection 69: 482488.Google Scholar
Hermans, D, Pasmans, F, Heyndrickx, M, Van Immerseel, F, Martel, A, Van Deun, K and Haesebrouck, F (2012). A tolerogenic mucosal immune response leads to persistent Campylobacter jejuni colonization in the chicken gut. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 38: 1729.Google Scholar
Hill, GA and Grimes, DJ (1984). Seasonal study of a freshwater lake and migratory waterfowl for Campylobacter jejuni. Canadian journal of Microbiology 30: 845849.Google Scholar
Hold, GL, Smith, M, Grange, C, Watt, ER, El-Omar, EM and Mukhopadhya, I (2014). Role of the gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: what have we learnt in the past 10 years? World Journal of Gastroenterology 20: 11921210.Google Scholar
Holmes, AH, Moore, LS, Sundsfjord, A, Steinbakk, M, Regmi, S, Karkey, A, Guerin, PJ and Piddock, LJ (2016). Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet 387: 176187.Google Scholar
Honda, K and Littman, DR (2012). The microbiome in infectious disease and inflammation. Annual Review of Immunology 30: 759795.Google Scholar
Horwitz, MA and Silverstein, SC (1980). Influence of the Escherichia coli capsule on complement fixation and on phagocytosis and killing by human phagocytes. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 65: 8294.Google Scholar
Humphrey, S, Chaloner, G, Kemmett, K, Davidson, N, Williams, N, Kipar, A, Humphrey, T and Wigley, P (2014). Campylobacter jejuni is not merely a commensal in commercial broiler chickens and affects bird welfare. MBio 5: e01364e01314.Google Scholar
Hurd, HS, Vaughn, MB, Holtkamp, D, Dickson, J and Warnick, L (2010). Quantitative risk from fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella and Campylobacter due to treatment of dairy heifers with enrofloxacin for bovine respiratory disease. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 7: 13051322.Google Scholar
Jackson, BR, Zegarra, JA, Lopez-Gatell, H, Sejvar, J, Arzate, F, Waterman, S, Nunez, AS, Lopez, B, Weiss, J, Cruz, RQ, Murrieta, DY, Luna-Gierke, R, Heiman, K, Vieira, AR, Fitzgerald, C, Kwan, P, Zarate-Bermudez, M, Talkington, D, Hill, VR and Mahon, B, Team GBSOI (2014). Binational outbreak of Guillain-Barre syndrome associated with Campylobacter jejuni infection, Mexico and USA, 2011. Epidemiology and Infection 142: 10891099.Google Scholar
Janssen, R, Krogfelt, KA, Cawthraw, SA, van Pelt, W, Wagenaar, JA and Owen, RJ (2008). Host-pathogen interactions in Campylobacter infections: the host perspective. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 21: 505518.Google Scholar
Jerome, JP, Bell, JA, Plovanich-Jones, AE, Barrick, JE, Brown, CT and Mansfield, LS (2011). Standing genetic variation in contingency loci drives the rapid adaptation of Campylobacter jejuni to a novel host. PLoS ONE 6: e16399.Google Scholar
Johnson, TJ, Shank, JM and Johnson, JG (2017). Current and potential treatments for reducing campylobacter colonization in animal hosts and disease in humans. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 487–000.Google Scholar
Jones, MA, Marston, KL, Woodall, CA, Maskell, DJ, Linton, D, Karlyshev, AV, Dorrell, N, Wren, BW and Barrow, PA (2004). Adaptation of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC11168 to high-level colonization of the avian gastrointestinal tract. Infection and Immunity 72: 37693776.Google Scholar
Kaakoush, NO, Castano-Rodriguez, N, Mitchell, HM and Man, SM (2015). Global epidemiology of campylobacter infection. Clinical microbiology reviews 28: 687720.Google Scholar
Kaida, K and Kusunoki, S (2010). Antibodies to gangliosides and ganglioside complexes in Guillain-Barre syndrome and Fisher syndrome: mini-review. Journal of Neuroimmunology 223: 512.Google Scholar
Karmali, MA and Fleming, PC (1979). Campylobacter enteritis in children. Journal of Pediatrics 94: 527533.Google Scholar
Keithlin, J, Sargeant, J, Thomas, MK and Fazil, A (2014). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the proportion of Campylobacter cases that develop chronic sequelae. BMC Public Health 14: 1203.Google Scholar
Ketley, J, Guerry, P and Panigrahi, P (1996). Pathogenic mechanisms. In: Newell, DG, Ketley, JM, Feldman, RA (eds) Campylobacters, Helicobacters, and Related Organisms. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 537544.Google Scholar
Ketley, JM (1997). Pathogenesis of enteric infection by Campylobacter. Microbiology 143(Pt 1): 521.Google Scholar
Kim, JS, Artymovich, KA, Hall, DF, Smith, EJ, Fulton, R, Bell, J, Dybas, L, Mansfield, LS, Tempelman, R, Wilson, DL and Linz, JE (2012). Passage of Campylobacter jejuni through the chicken reservoir or mice promotes phase variation in contingency genes Cj0045 and Cj0170 that strongly associates with colonization and disease in a mouse model. Microbiology 158: 13041316.Google Scholar
Kivistö, RI, Kovanen, S, Skarp-de Haan, A, Schott, T, Rahkio, M, Rossi, M and Hänninen, ML (2014). Evolution and comparative genomics of Campylobacter jejuni ST-677 clonal complex. Genome Biol Evol 6: 24242438.Google Scholar
Klancnik, A, Mozina, SS and Zhang, Q (2012). Anti-Campylobacter activities and resistance mechanisms of natural phenolic compounds in Campylobacter. PLoS ONE 7: e51800.Google Scholar
Knudsen, KN, Bang, DD, Nielsen, EM and Madsen, M (2005). Genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni strains from Danish broiler chickens by restriction fragment length polymorphism of the LPS gene cluster. Journal of Applied Microbiology 99: 392399.Google Scholar
Koga, M, Takahashi, M, Masuda, M, Hirata, K and Yuki, N (2005). Campylobacter gene polymorphism as a determinant of clinical features of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology 65: 13761381.Google Scholar
Kurz, M, Pischel, H, Hartung, HP and Kieseier, BC (2005). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-converting enzyme is expressed in the inflamed peripheral nervous system. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System 10: 311318.Google Scholar
Landers, TF, Cohen, B, Wittum, TE and Larson, EL (2012). A review of antibiotic use in food animals: perspective, policy, and potential. Public Health Reports 127: 422.Google Scholar
Lehmann, HC, Lopez, PH, Zhang, G, Ngyuen, T, Zhang, J, Kieseier, BC, Mori, S and Sheikh, KA (2007). Passive immunization with anti-ganglioside antibodies directly inhibits axon regeneration in an animal model. Journal of Neuroscience 27: 2734.Google Scholar
Li, CY, Xue, P, Tian, WQ, Liu, RC and Yang, C (1996). Experimental Campylobacter jejuni infection in the chicken: an animal model of axonal Guillain-Barre syndrome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 61: 279284.Google Scholar
Linton, D, Gilbert, M, Hitchen, PG, Dell, A, Morris, HR, Wakarchuk, WW, Gregson, NA and Wren, BW (2000). Phase variation of a beta-1,3 galactosyltransferase involved in generation of the ganglioside GM1-like lipo-oligosaccharide of Campylobacter jejuni. Molecular Microbiology 37: 501514.Google Scholar
Luangtongkum, T, Shen, Z, Seng, VW, Sahin, O, Jeon, B, Liu, P and Zhang, Q (2012). Impaired fitness and transmission of macrolide-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in its natural host. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 56: 13001308.Google Scholar
Luo, N, Pereira, S, Sahin, O, Lin, J, Huang, S, Michel, L and Zhang, Q (2005). Enhanced in vivo fitness of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in the absence of antibiotic selection pressure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 541546.Google Scholar
Malik, A, Sharma, D, St Charles, J, Dybas, LA and Mansfield, LS (2014). Contrasting immune responses mediate Campylobacter jejuni-induced colitis and autoimmunity. Mucosal Immunology 7: 802817.Google Scholar
Mansfield, LS and Urban, JF (1996). The pathogenesis of necrotic proliferative colitis in swine is linked to whipworm induced suppression of mucosal immunity to resident bacteria. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 50: 117.Google Scholar
Mansfield, LS, Bell, JA, Wilson, DL, Murphy, AJ, Elsheikha, HM, Rathinam, VA, Fierro, BR, Linz, JE and Young, VB (2007). C57BL/6 and congenic interleukin-10-deficient mice can serve as models of Campylobacter jejuni colonization and enteritis. Infection and Immunity 75: 10991115.Google Scholar
Mansfield, LS, Patterson, JS, Fierro, BR, Murphy, AJ, Rathinam, VA, Kopper, JJ, Barbu, NI, Onifade, TJ and Bell, JA (2008a). Genetic background of IL-10(−/−) mice alters host-pathogen interactions with Campylobacter jejuni and influences disease phenotype. Microbial Pathogenesis 45: 241257.Google Scholar
Mansfield, LS, Schauer, DB and Fox, JG (2008b). Chapter 21: animal models of Campylobacter jejuni infections. In: Nachamkin, I, Szymanski, CM, Blaser, MJ (eds) Campylobacter. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press, pp. 376379.Google Scholar
Martini, R and Willison, H (2016). Neuroinflammation in the peripheral nerve: cause, modulator, or bystander in peripheral neuropathies? Glia 64: 475486.Google Scholar
Maruyama, S, Tanaka, T, Katsube, Y, Nakanishi, H and Nukina, M (1990). Prevalence of thermophilic Campylobacters in crows (Corvus levaillantii, Corvus corone) and serogroups of the isolates. Nippon Juigaku Zasshi 52: 12371244.Google Scholar
McCrackin, MA, Helke, KL, Galloway, AM, Poole, AZ, Salgado, CD and Marriott, BP (2016). Effect of antimicrobial use in agricultural animals on drug-resistant foodborne campylobacteriosis in humans: a systematic literature review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 56: 21152132.Google Scholar
McGonigal, R, Rowan, EG, Greenshields, KN, Halstead, SK, Humphreys, PD, Rother, RP, Furukawa, K and Willison, HJ (2010). Anti-GD1a antibodies activate complement and calpain to injure distal motor nodes of ranvier in mice. Brain 133: 19441960.Google Scholar
Mohawk, KL, Poly, F, Sahl, JW, Rasko, DA and Guerry, P (2014). High frequency, spontaneous motA mutations in Campylobacter jejuni strain 81–176. PLoS ONE 9: e88043.Google Scholar
Montrose, MS, Shane, SM and Harrington, KS (1985). Role of litter in the transmission of Campylobacter jejuni. Avian Diseases 29: 392399.Google Scholar
Moore, JE, Barton, MD, Blair, IS, Corcoran, D, Dooley, JS, Fanning, S, Kempf, I, Lastovica, AJ, Lowery, CJ, Matsuda, M, McDowell, DA, McMahon, A, Millar, BC, Rao, JR, Rooney, PJ, Seal, BS, Snelling, WJ and Tolba, O (2006). The epidemiology of antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter. Microbes and Infection/Institut Pasteur 8: 19551966.Google Scholar
Moore, KW, Malefyt, RD, Coffman, RL and O'Garra, A (2001). Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annual Review of Immunology 19: 683765.Google Scholar
Moxon, ER, Paul, BR, Martin, AN and Richard, EL (1994). Adaptive evolution of highly mutable loci in pathogenic bacteria. Current Biology 4: 2433.Google Scholar
Nachamkin, I, Yang, XH and Stern, NJ (1993). Role of Campylobacter jejuni flagella as colonization factors for three-day-old chicks: analysis with flagellar mutants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59: 12691273.Google Scholar
Nachamkin, I, Allos, BM and Ho, T (1998). Campylobacter species and Guillain-Barre syndrome. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 11: 555567.Google Scholar
Nachamkin, I, Liu, J, Li, M, Ung, H, Moran, AP, Prendergast, MM and Sheikh, K (2002). Campylobacter jejuni from patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome preferentially expresses a GD(1a)-like epitope. Infection and Immunity 70: 52995303.Google Scholar
Newell, DG (2001). Animal models of Campylobacter jejuni colonization and disease and the lessons to be learned from similar Helicobacter pylori models. Journal of Applied Microbiology 90: 57S67S.Google Scholar
Newell, DG, Elvers, KT, Dopfer, D, Hansson, I, Jones, P, James, S, Gittins, J, Stern, NJ, Davies, R, Connerton, I, Pearson, D, Salvat, G and Allen, VM (2011). Biosecurity-based interventions and strategies to reduce Campylobacter spp. on poultry farms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 77: 86058614.Google Scholar
Nuijten, PJM, Berg, AJGvd, Formentini, I, Zeijst, Mvd and Jacobs, AAC (2000). DNA rearrangements in the flagellin locus of an flaA mutant of Campylobacter jejuni during colonization of chicken ceca. Infection and Immunity 68: 71377140.Google Scholar
Nurieva, RI and Chung, Y (2010). Understanding the development and function of T follicular helper cells. Cellular & Molecular Immunology 7: 190197.Google Scholar
O'Loughlin, JL, Samuelson, DR, Braundmeier-Fleming, AG, White, BA, Haldorson, GJ, Stone, JB, Lessmann, JJ, Eucker, TP and Konkel, ME (2015). The intestinal microbiota influences Campylobacter jejuni colonization and extraintestinal dissemination in mice. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81: 46424650.Google Scholar
Oh, E and Jeon, B (2015). Synergistic anti-Campylobacter jejuni activity of fluoroquinolone and macrolide antibiotics with phenolic compounds. Frontiers in Microbiology 6: 1129.Google Scholar
Oh, SJ, LaGanke, C and Claussen, GC (2001). Sensory Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology 56: 8286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, SP, Patel, DA, Callaway, TR and Torrence, ME (2009). ASAS centennial paper: developments and future outlook for preharvest food safety. Journal of Animal Science 87: 419437.Google Scholar
Ouyang, W, Rutz, S, Crellin, NK, Valdez, PA and Hymowitz, SG (2011). Regulation and functions of the IL-10 family of cytokines in inflammation and disease. Annual Review of Immunology 29: 71109.Google Scholar
Parker, CT, Horn, ST, Gilbert, M, Miller, WG, Woodward, DL and Mandrell, RE (2005). Comparison of Campylobacter jejuni lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis loci from a variety of sources. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 43: 27712781.Google Scholar
Parkhill, J, Wren, BW, Mungall, K, Ketley, JM, Churcher, C, Basham, D, Chillingworth, T, Davies, RM, Feltwell, T, Holroyd, S, Jagels, K, Karlyshev, AV, Moule, S, Pallen, MJ, Penn, CW, Quail, MA, Rajandream, MA, Rutherford, KM, van Vliet, AH, Whitehead, S and Barrell, BG (2000). The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature 403: 665668.Google Scholar
Pearson, AD, Greenwood, M, Healing, TD, Rollins, D, Shahamat, M, Donaldson, J and Colwell, RR (1993). Colonization of broiler chickens by waterborne Campylobacter jejuni. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59: 987996.Google Scholar
Perkins, DJ and Newstead, GL (1994). Campylobacter jejuni enterocolitis causing peritonitis, ileitis and intestinal obstruction. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 64: 5558.Google Scholar
Phongsisay, V, Perera, VN and Fry, BN (2006). Exchange of lipooligosaccharide synthesis genes creates potential Guillain-Barre syndrome-inducible strains of Campylobacter jejuni. Infection and Immunity 74: 13681372.Google Scholar
Pickett, CL, Pesci, EC, Cottle, DL, Russell, G, Erdem, AN and Zeytin, H (1996). Prevalence of cytolethal distending toxin production in Campylobacter jejuni and relatedness of Campylobacter sp. cdtB gene. Infection and Immunity 64: 20702078.Google Scholar
Prendergast, MM, Tribble, DR, Baqar, S, Scott, DA, Ferris, JA, Walker, RI and Moran, AP (2004). In vivo phase variation and serologic response to lipooligosaccharide of Campylobacter jejuni in experimental human infection. Infection and Immunity 72: 916922.Google Scholar
Rathinam, VA, Hoag, KA and Mansfield, LS (2008). Dendritic cells from C57BL/6 mice undergo activation and induce Th1-effector cell responses against Campylobacter jejuni. Microbes and Infection 10: 13161324.Google Scholar
Rathinam, VA, Appledorn, DM, Hoag, KA, Amalfitano, A and Mansfield, LS (2009). Campylobacter jejuni-induced activation of dendritic cells involves cooperative signaling through TLR4-MyD88 and TLR4-TRIF axes. Infection and Immunity 77: 24992507.Google Scholar
Sahin, O, Plummer, PJ, Jordan, DM, Sulaj, K, Pereira, S, Robbe-Austerman, S, Wang, L, Yaeger, MJ, Hoffman, LJ and Zhang, Q (2008). Emergence of a tetracycline-resistant Campylobacter jejuni clone associated with outbreaks of ovine abortion in the United States. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 46: 16631671.Google Scholar
Sahin, O, Fitzgerald, C, Stroika, S, Zhao, S, Sippy, RJ, Kwan, P, Plummer, PJ, Han, J, Yaeger, MJ and Zhang, Q (2012). Molecular evidence for zoonotic transmission of an emergent, highly pathogenic Campylobacter jejuni clone in the United States. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 50: 680687.Google Scholar
Scallan, E, Hoekstra, RM, Angulo, FJ, Tauxe, RV, Widdowson, MA, Roy, SL, Jones, JL and Griffin, PM (2011). Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--major pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17: 715.Google Scholar
Scott, AE, Timms, AR, Connerton, PL, Loc Carrillo, C, Adzfa Radzum, K and Connerton, IF (2007). Genome dynamics of Campylobacter jejuni in response to bacteriophage predation. PLoS Pathogens 3: e119.Google Scholar
Sestak, K, Merritt, CK, Borda, J, Saylor, E, Schwamberger, SR, Cogswell, F, Didier, ES, Didier, PJ, Plauche, G, Bohm, RP, Aye, PP, Alexa, P, Ward, RL and Lackner, AA (2003). Infectious agent and immune response characteristics of chronic enterocolitis in captive rhesus macaques. Infection and Immunity 71: 40794086.Google Scholar
Shimon, S (2000). Animal models of autoimmunity and their relevance to human diseases. Current Opinion in Immunology 12: 684690.Google Scholar
Shin, R, Suzuki, M and Morishita, Y (2002). Influence of intestinal anaerobes and organic acids on the growth of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Journal of Medical Microbiology 51: 201206.Google Scholar
Stahl, M, Ries, J, Vermeulen, J, Yang, H, Sham, HP, Crowley, SM, Badayeva, Y, Turvey, SE, Gaynor, EC, Li, X and Vallance, BA (2014). A novel mouse model of Campylobacter jejuni gastroenteritis reveals Key Pro-inflammatory and tissue protective roles for toll-like receptor signaling during infection. PLoS Pathogens 10: e1004264.Google Scholar
St Charles, JL, Bell, JA, Gadsden, BJ, Malik, A, Cooke, H, Van de Grift, LK, Kim, HY, Smith, EJ and Mansfield, LS (2017). Guillain Barre syndrome is induced in Non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice following Campylobacter jejuni infection and is exacerbated by antibiotics. Journal of Autoimmunity 77: 1138.Google Scholar
Stecher, B and Hardt, WD (2008). The role of microbiota in infectious disease. Trends in Microbiology 16: 107114.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, S, Lohrengel, M, Sonnevend, A, Ruberg, F and Kist, M (2001). Allelic diversity and recombination in Campylobacter jejuni. Journal of Bacteriology 183: 25532559.Google Scholar
Tadesse, DA, Bahnson, PB, Funk, JA, Thakur, S, Morrow, WE, Wittum, T, DeGraves, F, Rajala-Schultz, P and Gebreyes, WA (2011). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. Regions. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 8: 367374.Google Scholar
Tam, CC, O'Brien, SJ, Petersen, I, Islam, A, Hayward, A and Rodrigues, LC (2007). Guillain-Barre syndrome and preceding infection with Campylobacter, influenza and Epstein-Barr virus in the general practice research database. PLoS ONE 2: e344.Google Scholar
Ternhag, A, Torner, A, Svensson, A, Ekdahl, K and Giesecke, J (2008). Short- and long-term effects of bacterial gastrointestinal infections. Emerging Infectious Diseases 14: 143148.Google Scholar
Thomas, DK, Lone, AG, Selinger, LB, Taboada, EN, Uwiera, RR, Abbott, DW and Inglis, GD (2014). Comparative variation within the genome of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC 11168 in human and murine hosts. PLoS ONE 9: e88229.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, O, Cornelius, AJ, Souayah, H, Martiny, D, Vlaes, L, Brandt, SM and On, SL (2013). The role of Epsilonproteobacteria in children with gastroenteritis. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 32: 11401142.Google Scholar
van den Berg, B, Walgaard, C, Drenthen, J, Fokke, C, Jacobs, BC and van Doorn, PA (2014). Guillain-Barre syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Nature Reviews Neurology 10: 469482.Google Scholar
van der Waaij, D, Berghuis-de Vries, JM and Lekkerkerk-van der Wees, JEC (1971). Colonization resistance of the digestive tract in conventional and antibiotic-treated mice. The Journal of Hygiene (Lond) 69: 405411.Google Scholar
van der Waaij, D, Berghuis-de Vries, JM and Lekkerkerk-van der Wees, JEC (1972). Colonization resistance of the digestive tract and the spread of bacteria to the lymphatic organs in mice. The Journal of Hygiene (Lond) 70: 335342.Google Scholar
van der Woude, MW and Baumler, AJ (2004). Phase and antigenic variation in bacteria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 17: 581611.Google Scholar
Wassenaar, TM, Zeijst, BAMvd, Ayling, R and Newell, DG (1993). Colonization of chicks by motility mutants of Campylobacter jejuni demonstrates the importance of flagellin A expression. Journal of General Microbiology 139: 11711175.Google Scholar
Wassenaar, TM, Geilhausen, B and Newell, DG (1998). Evidence of genomic instability in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from poultry. Applied and environmental microbiology 64: 18161821.Google Scholar
Weis, AM, Storey, DB, Taff, CC, Townsend, AK, Huang, BC, Kong, NT, Clothier, KA, Spinner, A, Byrne, BA and Weimer, BC (2016). Genomic comparison of Campylobacter spp. and their potential for zoonotic transmission between birds, primates, and livestock. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 82: 71657175.Google Scholar
Wells, CL, Maddaus, MA, Jechorek, RP and Simmons, RL (1988). Role of intestinal anaerobic bacteria in colonization resistance. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 7: 107113.Google Scholar
Willison, HJ and Plomp, JJ (2008). Anti-ganglioside antibodies and the presynaptic motor nerve terminal. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1132: 114123.Google Scholar
Willison, HJ, Jacobs, BC and van Doorn, PA (2016). Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet 388: 717727.Google Scholar
Winter, SE, Thiennimitr, P, Winter, MG, Butler, BP, Huseby, DL, Crawford, RW, Russell, JM, Bevins, CL, Adams, LG, Tsolis, RM, Roth, JR and Bäumler, AJ (2010). Gut inflammation provides a respiratory electron acceptor for Salmonella. Nature 467: 426429.Google Scholar
Young, KT, Davis, LM and Dirita, VJ (2007). Campylobacter jejuni: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Nature Reviews. Microbiology 5: 665679.Google Scholar
Young, VB and Mansfield, LS (2005). Campylobacter infection—clinical context. In: Ketley, JM, Konkel, ME (eds) Campylobacter: Molecular and Cellular Biology. London, UK: Horizon Bioscience, pp. 112.Google Scholar
Yuki, N, Taki, T, Inagaki, F, Kasama, T, Takahashi, M, Saito, K, Handa, S and Miyatake, T (1993). A bacterium lipopolysaccharide that elicits Guillain-Barré syndrome has a GM1 ganglioside-like structure. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 178: 17711775.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q, Lin, J and Pereira, S (2003). Fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in animal reservoirs: dynamics of development, resistance mechanisms and ecological fitness. Animal Health Research Reviews 4: 6371.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q, Sahin, O, McDermott, PF and Payot, S (2006). Fitness of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter and salmonella. Microbes and Infection 8: 19721978.Google Scholar
Zhou, K, Aertsen, A and Michiels, C (2014). The role of variable DNA tandem repeats in bacterial adaptation. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 38.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. The major factors that interact to produce gastrointestinal disease. Host innate responses coupled with the gut microbiota can produce colonization resistance to certain enteric pathogens. Diet and other environmental factors such as antibiotic treatment can modify the microbiome and select for pathogen resistance. Many other interactions are possible that have yet to be explored experimentally.