Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T03:05:26.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adomnán, plague and the Easter controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2012

David Woods*
Affiliation:
University College, Cork
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Adomnán's description (Vita Columbae II.46) of how the intercession of St. Columba preserved the Picts and the Irish in Britain alone among the peoples of western Europe against two great epidemics of bubonic plague is a coded defence of their use of the traditional Irish 84-year Easter table against the Dionysian Easter table as used throughout the rest of western Europe. His implication is that God sent the plagues to punish those who used the Dionysian table. Hence Adomnán still adhered to the 84-year table by the time that he composed the Vita Columbae c. 697. It probably took a third epidemic 700–c. 702 to persuade Adomnán that his interpretation of the earlier epidemics was incorrect, so that Bede (HE V.15) is correct to date his conversion to the Dionysian table to a third visit to Northumbria c. 702.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011