Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-15T16:30:06.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Study of Political Parties, 1906–2005: The View from the Journals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2006

HOWARD L. REITER
HOWARD L. REITER
Affiliation:
The University of Connecticut
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A review of party-related articles in major political science journals over the past century reveals an increase in the incidence of such articles during the behavioral revolution and a decline in the proportion of studies that view parties holistically or in their organizational aspects and an increase in research on mass and legislative behavior. The essay calls for scholars of American parties to merge empirical findings with the generalist and normative concerns of an earlier age, to assess the recent advent of parties as ideologically focused instruments of policymaking.

Type
“THE EVOLUTION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE” ESSAYS
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 100 , Issue 4 , November 2006 , pp. 613 - 618
Copyright
© 2006 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Political Science Association Committee on Political Parties. 1950. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System.” Supplement to the American Political Science Review, vol. 44.
American Political Science Association Committee for the Advancement of Teaching. 1951. Goals for Political Science. New York: William Sloane.
American Political Science Association Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy. 2004. American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality. Washington: American Political Science Association.
Bianco William T., and Itai Sened. 2005. “Uncovering Evidence of Conditional Party Government.” American Political Science Review 99 (August): 361– 72.Google Scholar
Bryce James. 1893–1895. The American Commonwealth. New York: Macmillan.
Burnham Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.
Chambers William Nisbet, and Walter Dean Burnham, eds. 1967. The American Party Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
Clarke Harold D., and Marianne C. Stewart. 1998. “The Decline of Parties in the Minds of Citizens.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 357– 78.Google Scholar
Crotty William. 1991. “Political Parties: Issues and Trends.” In Political Science: Looking to the Future: Vol. 4: American Institutions, ed. William Crotty. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 137– 201.
Dennis Alfred L. P. 1911. “Impressions of British Party Politics, 1909–1911.” American Political Science Review 5 (November): 509– 34.Google Scholar
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Eckstein Harry. 1968. “Parties, Political: Party Systems.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 11, ed. David L. Sills. N.p.: The Macmillan Company and the Free Press, 436– 53.
Epstein Leon D. 1975. “Political Parties.” In Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 4: Nongovernmental Politics, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. Fred. I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 229– 77.
Epstein Leon D. 1983. “The Scholarly Commitment to Parties.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Ada W. Finifter. Washington: American Political Science Association, 127– 53.
Eulau Heinz, and James G. March, eds. 1969. Political Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Garvey Gerald. 1966. “The Theory of Party Equilibrium.” American Political Science Review 60 (March): 29– 38.Google Scholar
Gerring John. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Haddow Anna. 1939. Political Science in American Colleges and Universities 1636–1900. New York: D. Appleton-Century.
Hetherington Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship.” American Political Science Review 95 (September): 619– 31.Google Scholar
Janda Kenneth. 1993. “Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. Ada W. Finifter. Washington: American Political Science Association, 163– 91.
Katznelson Ira. 2005. “Which Liberalism?” Perspectives on Politics 3 (June): 310.Google Scholar
Key V. O. Jr., 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17 (February): 3– 18.Google Scholar
Mair Peter, and Cas Mudde. 1998. “The Party Family and Its Study.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 211– 29.Google Scholar
Millett John D. 1955. “The Department of Public Law and Government.” In A History of the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University, ed. R. Gordon Hoxie et al. New York: Columbia University Press, 256– 83.
Roettger Walter B. 1978. “Strata and Stability: Reputations of American Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science & Politics 11 (Winter): 6– 12.Google Scholar
Schattschneider E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Schlesinger Joseph A. 1968. “Parties, Political: Party Units.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 11, ed. David L. Sills. N.p.: The Macmillan Company and the Free Press, 428– 36.
Somit Albert, and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1964. American Political Science. New York: Atherton.
Stokes Donald E. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57 (June): 368– 77.Google Scholar
Stokes S. C. 1999. “Political Parties and Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 243– 67.Google Scholar
Truman David B. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Wilson Woodrow. 1908. Constitutional Government in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.