Hostname: page-component-66644f4456-vjjx6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T01:50:05.422Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Case” Responds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2002

Catharine A. MacKinnon
Catharine A. MacKinnon*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

MacKinnon responds that her theory, while not liberalism in denial or disguise, is engaged in dialogue with liberalism (as well as with other theoretical traditions).

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 95 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 709 - 711
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2001

References

Eisenstein, Zillah R. 1981. The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1998. “Are Women Human?” In Reflections on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Fiftieth Anniversary Anthology, ed. Barend Van Der Heijden and Bahia Tahzib-Lie. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, Kulwer International Law. Pp. 171–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 2000. “Points against Postmodernism.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 75 (3): 687–712.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1869] 1975. “The Subjugation of Women.” In Three Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1999. Sex and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Denise. 2001. “Feminism and Liberalism Reconsidered: The Case of Catharine MacKinnon.” American Political Science Review 95 (September): 699–708.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Steven. 1998. Unwanted Sex: The Culture of Intimidation and the Failure of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 1993. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.