Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T19:25:51.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Extending Copyright to Unprotected Works to Comply with Berne Convention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

References

1 Justice Ginsburg wrote for the Court; Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Alito, dissented. Justice Kagan did not participate.

2 Adam Liptak, Public Domain Works Can Be Copyrighted Anew, Supreme Court Rules, N.Y. Times, Jan. 19, 2012, at B12.

3 Adam Liptak, Once in the Public’s Hands, Now Back in Picasso’s, N.Y. Times, Mar. 22, 2011, at A16; Adam Liptak, In Supreme Court Argument, A Rock Legend Plays a Role, N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 2011, at B2.

4 U.S. CONST, art. I, §8, cl. 8 (“Congress shall have Power. . . [t] o promote the Progress of Science... by securing for limited Times to Authors. . . the exclusive Right to their . . . Writings.”).

5 Robert Barnes, Copyright Case Will Decide Fate of Millions of Once-Public Works, Wash. Post, Oct. 5, 2011, at A3.

6 Golan v. Holder, 132 S.Ct. 873, 875 (2012).

7 Id. at 884 (parallel citations omitted).

8 Id. at 891-92 (footnotes omitted).