Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T19:04:51.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

U.S. Supreme Court Rules Statute Directing State Department to Record Jerusalem-Born Citizen's Birthplace as "Israel" Does Not Raise Political Question

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

References

1 Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 104 AJIL 271, 278 (2010)Google Scholar.

2 Zivotofsky v. Clinton, 132 S.Ct. 1421, 1425-26 (2012).

3 Id. at 1430-31; see also Lipták, Adam, Dispute over Jerusalem Engages Court, N.Y. Times, Nov. 8, 2011, at A13Google Scholar; Barnes, Robert, Justices Finda Pile of Issues in Passport Case, Wash. Post, Nov. 8, 2011, at A2Google Scholar; Editorial, President’s Prerogative , 41 ‘Ash. Post, Nov. 10, 2011, at A24Google Scholar; Cushman, John M. Jr., Justices Decline to Say if Jerusalem-Born Americans Can Claim Israeli Birthplace, N.Y. Times, Mar. 27, 2012, at A15 Google Scholar; Courts Can Decide Issue of Israel as Birthpkce, Wash. Post, Mar. 27, 2012, at A6.

4 2 Pub. L. No. 107-228 (2002), 116 Stat. 1350 (codified at 22 U.S.C. §2651 note (2006)).

5 President Bush, George W., Statement on Signing the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 38 Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc. 1659 (Sept. 30, 2002)Google Scholar.

6 Zivotofsky v. Clinton, 571 F.3d 1227, 1233 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

7 Zivotofiky, 132 S.Ct. at 1425.

8 Id. at 1427-28 (citation omitted).

9 Id. at 1436 (Alito, J., concurring).

10 Id. at 1441 (Breyer, J., dissenting).