No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
1 See Rorty, Richard, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity 42-43, 65-69 (1989)Google Scholar.
2 Weil, Prosper, Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?, 77 AJIL 413 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 For a review of the issues, see Carty, Anthony, The Continuing Influence of Kelsen on the General Perception of the Discipline of International Law, 9 Eur. J. Int’l L. 344 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 John Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined 200-01 (1954).
5 For a discussion of these issues, see Cécile Tournaye, Kelsen et la Securite Collective (1995).
6 Aust, Anthony, The Theory and Practice of Informal International Instruments, 35 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 787 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 For a general discussion of Tasioulas’s unacknowledged anti-foundationalism, see Beckett, Jason A., Behind Relative Normativity: Rules and Process as Prerequisites of Law, 12 Eur. J. Int’l L. 627 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 E.g., Derrida, Jacques, Force of Law, “The Mystical Foundation of Authority,” 11 Cardozo L. Rev. 919 (Mary Quaintance trans., 1990) (possibly representing a canonic text of the critical school)Google Scholar.
9 See, e.g., Gerry Simpson, Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order (2004).
10 See, e.g., International Law on the Left, Re-Examining Marxist Legacies (Susan Marks ed., 2008).
You have
Access