Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-lhnfz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T01:24:29.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Warren v. United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 1951 , pp. 591 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jackson and Clark, JJ., dissented on the ground that the injuries were not received “in the service of the ship.” Frankfurter, J., dissented on the ground that the decision of the Court of Appeals that libelant's conduct was a “deliberate act of indiscretion” should not be disturbed.