Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T05:20:24.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contrasting legal conceptions of family obligation and financial reciprocity in the support of older people: France and England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1998

JULIA TWIGG  and
ALAIN GRAND
JULIA TWIGG
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Public Policy, University of Kent
ALAIN GRAND
Affiliation:
Department d'Epidemiologie, Université Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper explores the way family obligation and reciprocity are defined in law in France and England. Focusing on the areas of inheritance and financial support in relation to older people, it explores how these are contrasted and linked in the two societies. In France, families are legally obliged to support their kin through obligation alimentaire, but inheritance is secured by law within the family. In England by contrast there is no such legal obligation to support older relatives; nor is there any constraint on inheritance: testamentary freedom is the legal principle. The paper discusses the significance of these differences and assesses how far they are modified by the operation of the welfare state and by embedded assumptions about family relations. It sets the differences within the context of different discourses of law and social policy in the two countries.

Keywords

FamilyobligationinheritancesupportintergenerationalpolicylawcomparativeFrance
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , March 1998 , pp. 131 - 146
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press