Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-t8hx9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T17:49:54.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Flow in S-shaped Ducts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

P Bansod  and
P Bradshaw
P Bansod
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, The City University
P Bradshaw
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College of Science and Technology
Get access

Summary

Measurements are presented of total pressure, static pressure, surface shear stress and yaw angle in the flow through several S-shaped ducts, each with a thin turbulent boundary layer at entry. The results show that the region of low total pressure in the exit plane, found by previous workers, is due to expulsion of boundary-layer fluid by a pair of contra-totating vortices in the boundary layer. The generation of these vortices is explained: similarly-produced vortices, with similar effects, occur in some types of wind-tunnel contraction and possibly in other three-dimensional flows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , May 1972 , pp. 131 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rowe, M Measurements and computations in pipe bends. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 43, p 771, 1970.Google Scholar
2. Zanker, K J Brock, T E A review of the literature on fluid flow through closed conduit bends. British Hydraulics Research Association, TN 901, 1967.Google Scholar
3. Smith, A J Ward The flow and pressure losses in smooth pipe bends of constant cross section. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 67 p 437, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Fish, P E J Three-dimensional flow of fluids in ducts. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College, 1970.Google Scholar
5. Patel, V C Calibration of the Preston tube and limitations on its use in pressure gradients. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 23, p 185, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Bansod, P The flow in S-shaped air intakes. MSc Project Report, Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, 1970.Google Scholar
7. Perkins, H J The formation of streamwise vorticity in turbulent flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 44, p 721, 1970.Google Scholar
8. Bearman, P W Unpublished work at NPL: Private communication, 1970.Google Scholar
9. Rainbird, W J Turbulent boundary-layer growth and separation on a yawed cone. AIAA Journal, Vol 6, p 2410, 1968.Google Scholar
10. Gartshore, I The streamwise development of two-dimensional wall jets and other two-dimensional turbulent shear flows. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, 1965.Google Scholar
11. Bradshaw, P The effect of wind-tunnel screens on nominally two-dimensional boundary layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 22, p 679, 1965.Google Scholar
12. Keffer, J F The uniform distortion of a turbulent wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 22, p 135, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Keffer, J F A note on the expansion of turbulent wakes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 28, p 183, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Winter, K G Rotta, J C Smith, K G Studies of the turbulent boundary layer on a waisted body of revolution in subsonic and supersonic flow. ARC R & M 3933, 1968.Google Scholar
15. Bradshaw, P The analogy between streamline curvature and buoyancy in turbulent shear flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 36, p 177, 1969.Google Scholar
16. Huffman, G D A re-examination of some retransitional flows. Aero Report 71-05, Imperial College, 1971. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 53, p 45, 1972.Google Scholar