Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-wnk8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T20:24:00.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Separated flow about a wedge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

S. Mukherjea  and
G. Bandyopadhyay
S. Mukherjea
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
G. Bandyopadhyay
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A numerical method, based on the panel technique, has been developed for calculating the time-averaged separated flow about a wedge. The mathematical model, with constant vorticity in the wake, gives an infinite extension of the wake and constant base pressure while incorporation of the dispersion of vorticity in the wake into the mathematical model leads to its finiteness and non-uniform under-pressure. Experimental tests have been conducted in a low speed wind tunnel on models haying different wedge angles. The theoretical and experimental results agree closely for different configurations and specific values of dispersion factors. However, the agreement for base pressure is poor.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 94 , Issue 936 , July 1990 , pp. 196 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tanner, M. Theoretical predictions of base pressure for steady base flow, Prog Aeronaut Sci, 1973, 14, pp 177–225.Google Scholar
2. Leonard, A. Vortex methods for flow simulation, J Comput Phys, Oct 1980, 37, pp 289–335.Google Scholar
3. Maskew, B. and Dvorak, F. A. The Prediction of Clmax using a separated flow model, J Am Helicopter Soc, April 1978, 23, pp 2–8.Google Scholar
4. Ribaut, M. A vortex sheet method for calculating separated two-dimensional flows, AIAA J, August 1983, 21, (8), pp 1079–1084.Google Scholar
5. Pearcy, M. M., Singh, S., Cash, R. F. and Matten, R. B. Fluid Loading on Roughened Cylindrical Members of Circular Cross Section, NMI Report 191, January 1985.Google Scholar
6. Crabtree, L. F. Prediction of Transition in the Boundary Layer on an Aerofoil, RAE TN Aero 2491, 1957.Google Scholar
7. Tani, I. Low speed flows involving bubble separations, PiAS, 5, 70, 1964.Google Scholar
8. Followell, A. J. Experimental Study of Separated Flow at Low Speeds. Final Year Project, The City University, London, May 1985.Google Scholar
9. Helmholtz, H. Uber Diskonteinuierliche Flussigkeitsbewegungen, Monats — Berichte Berliner Akademie, April 1968, Vol 23, pp 215–228.Google Scholar
10. Fage, A. and Johansen, F. C. On the flow of air behind an inclined flat plate of finite span. Proc R Soc London, Sept 1927, A116, pp 170–197.Google Scholar