Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-hpxsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T10:24:24.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modelling methane-air turbulent diffusion flame in a gas turbine combustor with artifical neural network

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

N. S. Mehdizadeh
Affiliation:
Centre of Excellence in Computational Aerospace Engineering, Aerospace Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
P. Sinaei
Affiliation:
sinaei@aut.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present paper reports a way of using an artificial neural network (ANN) for modelling methane-air jet diffusion turbulent flame characteristics, such as temperature and chemical species mass fractions in a gas turbine combustion chamber. Since the neural network needs sets of examples to adapt its synaptic weights in the training phase, we used pre-assumed probability density function (PDF) method and considered chemical equilibrium chemistry model to compute the flame characteristics for generating the examples of input-output data sets. In this approach, flow and mixing field results are presented with a non-linear first order k-ε model. The turbulence model is applied in combination with preassumed β-PDF modelling for turbulence-chemistry interaction. The training algorithm for the neural network is based on a back-propagation supervised learning procedure, and the feed-forward multilayer network is incorporated as neural network architecture. The ability of ANN model to represent a highly non-linear system, such as a turbulent non-premixed flame is illustrated, and it can be summarized that the results of modelling of the combustion characteristics using ANN model are satisfactory, and the CPU-time and memory savings encouraging.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

References

1. Baritaud, T., Poinsot, T. and Baum, M., Direct Numerical Simulation for Turbulent Reacting Flows, 1996, Editions Technip, Paris.Google Scholar
2. Rhodes, R.P., A probability distribution function for turbulent flows, Turbulent Mixing in Non-Reactive and Reactive Flows, Marthy, S.N.B. (Ed), Plenum Press, 1975.Google Scholar
3. Pope, S.B., Computationally efficient implementation of combustion chemistry using in situ adaptive tabulation, 1996, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Report, FDA 96-02.Google Scholar
4. Maas, U. and Pope, S., Simplifying chemical kinetics: intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space, Combustion and Flame, 1992, 88, pp 239264.Google Scholar
5. Shih, T.H., Liou, W.W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z. and Zhu, , J Comput. Fluids, 1995, 24, (3), pp 227238.Google Scholar
6. Yaga, M., and Sasada, K., An eddy characteristic time modeling in LES for gas turbine combustor, July, 2000, Proceedings International Joint Power Generation Conference, Miami Beach, Florida, pp 2326.Google Scholar
7. Merci, B., De Langhe, C., Lodefier, K. and Dick, E., J Thermophys Heat Transfer, 2004, 18, (1), pp 100107.Google Scholar
8. Chen, J.Y., Kollmann, W. and Dibble, R.W., PDF Modeling of turbulent non-premixed methane jet flames, Combustion Science and Technology, 1989, 64, pp 315346.Google Scholar
9. Merci, B. and Dick, E., Flow Turb Combust, 2002, 68, (4), pp 335358.Google Scholar
10. Merci, B., Naud, B. and Roekaerts, D., Flow and mixing fields for transported scalar PDF simulations of a piloted jet diffusion flame, Flow Turb Combust, 2005, 74, pp 239272.Google Scholar
11. Karayiannis, N.B. and Venetsanopoules, A.N., Artificial Neural Networks, 1993, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
12. Christo, F.C., Masri, A.R. and Nebot, E.M., Artificial neural network implementation of chemistry simulation of H2/CO2 flames, Combustion and Flame, 1996, 106, pp 406427.Google Scholar
13. Limin, F., Neural Network in Computer Intelligence, 1994, McGraw-Hill, International Editions.Google Scholar
14. Blasco, J.A., Fueyo, N., Dopazo, C. and Ballester, J., Modeling the temporal evolution of a reduced combustion chemical system with an artificial neural network, Combustion and Flame, 1998, 113, (1/2), pp 3852.Google Scholar
15. Merci, B., Dick, E. and De Langhe, C., Combustion and Flame, 2002, 131, (4), pp 465468.Google Scholar
16. Second Workshop on Aerodynamics of Steady-State Combustion Chambers and Furnaces (ASCF), 28-29 November, 1996, Pisa. Final Report. Mariotti, G. and Tiribuzi, S. (Edited), ENEL, Direzione Studi E Richerche, Centro Ricerca Termica.Google Scholar