Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T08:19:45.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Jet Flap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

I. M. Davidson
I. M. Davidson*
Affiliation:
National Gas Turbine Establishment
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Throughout the animal kingdom powered flight is a surprisingly common attribute and whenever it occurs both the sustenation and the propulsion are provided by the same structural and aerodynamic mechanism. There is, in fact, but a single aerodynamic reaction which is divided, for convenience, into thrust and lift. In earlier times this convention was presumably not recognised, for the ornithopter appears to have formed for some centuries the principal technical basis of man's aspiration to heavier-than-air flight. Of the exceptions, Leonardo da Vinci's helicopter is now, of course, an accepted vehicle, but this lecture is concerned mainly with fixed-wing aircraft for which it is significant that success came only with the aeroplane, or, as Lachmann has recently put it, with the powered glider.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 60 , Issue 541 , January 1956 , pp. 25 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lachmann, G. V. (1955). Boundary Layer Control. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, March 1955.Google Scholar
2. Durand, W. F. (editor) (1934). Aerodynamic Theory. Volumes I to VI.Google Scholar
3. Stewart, O. (1954). High Promise of Powered Lift. The Times Survey of British Aviation, September 1954.Google Scholar
4. Hagedorn, H. and Ruden, P. (1938). Windkanaluntersuchungen an einem Junkers-Doppelflugel mit Ausblaseschlitz am Heck des Hauptflugels. Report by the Institut fur Aeromechanik und Flugtechnik der Technischen Hochschule Hannover, Lilienthal Gesellschaft Bericht A64.Google Scholar
5. Valensi, J., Parigi, H. and Borgel, Mile. J. (1942). A memorandum distributed during World War II in the form of several autographed copies. The work is described also by Metral and Zerner—see Reference 12 below.Google Scholar
6. Poisson-Quinton, Ph. (1948). Recherches Théoretiques et Experimentales sur le Controle de la Couche Limite. Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Applied Mechanics, Volume 2, Part II, London 1948.Google Scholar
7. Jousserandot, J. (1954). Synthese sur des Essais Systématiques d'Hypersustenation par Soufflage au Bord de Fuite d'un Profil en Incompressible. Delivered during a technical conference at the Office Nationale d'Etudes et de Recherches Aéronautiques, December 1954.Google Scholar
8. Bamber, M. J. (1931). Wind Tunnel Tests on Airfoil Boundary Layer Control using a Backward-opening Slot. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Report No. 385.Google Scholar
9. MissLyon, H. M., Barnes, E. G. and Adamson, J. E. (1941). Further Experiments on Boundary Layer Control as a Means of Increasing Lift. An unpublished report of the Royal Aircraft Establishment.Google Scholar
10. Mettam, A. R. (1951). Development of Air-ejection Flying Controls, based on Free-flight and Wind Tunnel Model Tests. An unpublished memorandum of the Royal Aircraft Establishment.Google Scholar
11. Stratford, B. S. and Dimmock, N. A. (1955). Mixing and the Jet Flap. An unpublished memorandum of the National Gas Turbine Establishment.Google Scholar
12. Metral, A. and Zerner, F. (1948). L'Effet Coanda. Publication scientifique du Ministère de L'Air, No. 218.Google Scholar