No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Electronic Spreadsheets for XRF - Survey and Comparison
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Abstract
The electronic spreadsheet market for the IBM or compatible PC has become competitive. One can find a dozen or more different spreadsheet programs available today which are very nicely graphically “dressed,” Computer journals indicate that the main spreadsheet competitors.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1995
References
2.
Miller, M. J., “Aree They Suites Yet?”, PC Magazine, October 25, 1994, pp. 159–219.Google Scholar
3.
Leonard, W., arid Chen, V. “Toolkit-Working toward detente in the war between Excel and Word for Windows”, PC Computing, February 1994Google Scholar
4. QUE, “Using 1 -2-3 Release 5 for Windows”, Special Edition, QUE Development Group QUE Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1994.Google Scholar
5.
Hergcrt, D., Davis, G. H., “Understanding 1-2-3 Release 5 for Windows, ” SYBEX INC., Alameda, California, 1994.Google Scholar
6. LOTUS, “Lotus 1-2-3 Release 5 -- Spreadsheet for Windows, ” Lotus Development Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994.Google Scholar
7. MICROSOFT, “User's Guide - Microsoft Excel Version 5, ” Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington, 1993.Google Scholar
9.
Person, R., “Using Excel Version 5 for Windows, ” QUE Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1993.Google Scholar
10. The Cobb Group, “Running Microsoft Excel 5 for Windows, ” The Cobb Group and Microsoft Press, 1994.Google Scholar
11.
Gaeng, P., Kamenz, A., Vonhoegen, H., “Excel 5 Complete”, Special Edition. ABACUS, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1994.Google Scholar
12.
Campbell, M., “Excel for Windows Answers”, Osborne Mc Graw-Hill, Berkeley, California, 1994.Google Scholar
13.
Speuce, J., Davy, G., Howes, C., “Microsoft Excel 5 for Windows by Example, ”
Webster Publishing Pty LTD., Australia, 1994.Google Scholar
14.
Gaeng, P.
“Excel for Science and Technology”, ABACUS, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1993.Google Scholar
15. O'Hara, S., Snyder, J. A., Van Buren, C., “Excel Version 5 for Windows Quick Reference”, QUE Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1993.Google Scholar
16.
Nelson, S. L., “Field Guide to Microsoft Excel 5 for Windows”, Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington, 1994.Google Scholar
17. Wordperfect, “User's Guidc-Quattro Pro V. 6. 0 for Window. ” WordPerfect, Novel! Applications Group, Orem, Utah, 1994.Google Scholar
18.
Underdahl, B., “Using Quattro Pro 6 for Windows, ” QUE Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1994.Google Scholar
19.
Wcisskopf, G., “Mastering Quattro Pro 5 for Windows, ” SYBEX INC., Alameda, California, 1993.Google Scholar
20. KLS, “Learning Excel 5. 0 Video Training Set, ” Keystone Learning Systems Corp., Provo, Utah, 1994.Google Scholar
21. KLS, “Learning Lotus 1-2-3 Release 5 Video Training Set, ” Keystone Learning Systems Corp., Provo, Utah, 1994.Google Scholar
22. KLS, “Learning Quattro Pro 5. 0 Video Training Set, ” Keystone Learning Systems Corp., Provo, Utah, 1994,Google Scholar
23.
Walden, R. J., “Excel docs it again: A Slick Upgrade”, PC Computing, December 1993, Pp. 60–61.Google Scholar
24.
Stinson, C., “Diversity Blossoms Amid the Rows and Columns. ” PC Magazine, November 10, 1992, pp. 111–170.Google Scholar
25.
Klimasara, A. J., “A mathematical comparison of the Lachance-Traill Matrix correction procedure with statistical multiple linear regression analysis in XRF applications, ” Vol. 36, Advances in X-ray Analysis, Plenum Publ. Corp., NY (1993).Google Scholar
26.
Klimasara, A. J., “Mathematical Modeling of XRF Matrix Correction Algorithms with an Electronic Spreadsheet”, Vol. 37, Advances in X-ray Analysis, Plenum Publ. Corp., NY (1994).Google Scholar