Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T09:40:38.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of methods for remotely sensing grass growth to enable precision application of nitrogen fertilizer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

P.M. Berry ,
H.F. Holmes  and
C. Blacker
P.M. Berry*
Affiliation:
ADAS High Mowthorpe, Duggleby, Malton, N Yorkshire YO178BP, UK
H.F. Holmes
Affiliation:
ADAS Boxworth, Boxworth, Cambridge CB234NN, UK
C. Blacker
Affiliation:
Precision Decisions, Shipton by Beningbrough, York, North Yorkshire, YO301BS, UK
*
† E-mail: pete.berry@adas.co.uk
Get access

Abstract

A ‘chessboard’ field experiment set up to investigate how the yield response to nitrogen (N) fertiliser varied spatially within a field in the UK indicated that the optimum N rate varied substantially by up to 100 kg N/ha within the three hectare experimental area. Variation in N optima was negatively related to the soil N supply. However, soil N supply, yield potential and apparent fertiliser recovery rate were inter-related which meant that the influence of each element on N optima was complex. Spectral reflectance indices related well to crop N uptake and could be used to help estimate soil N supply.

Keywords

grassnitrogen fertiliseroptimum fertiliser ratevariable rate technology
Type
Precision Pasture
Information
Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 8 , Special Issue 2: Papers presented at the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA 2017), John McIntyre Centre, Edinburgh, UK, July 16–20 2017 , July 2017 , pp. 758 - 763
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberda, T 1977. Possibilities of dry matter production from forage plants under different climatic conditions. In Proceedings of the 13th International Grassland Congress E, WOjahn and H Thons (eds), 18–27. MayLeipzig, Germany, pp. 61–69.Google Scholar
Defra 2010. Fertiliser Manual (RB209), 8th Edition. The Stationery Office, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
Kindred, DR, Hatley, D, Ginsburg, D, Catalayud, A, Storer, K, Wilson, L, Hockridge, B, Milne, A, Marchant, B, Miller, P and Sylvester-Bradley, R 2016. Automating nitrogen fertiliser management for cereals (Auto-N). AHDB Project Report No. 561, UK. 196 pp.Google Scholar
Pullanagari, RR, Yule, IJ, Tuohy, MP, Hedley, MJ, Dynes, RA and King, WM 2013. Proximal sensing of the seasonal variability of pasture nutritive value using multispectral radiometry. Grass Forage Science 68, 110–119.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R, Berry, PM, Wiseman, J and Cottrill, B 2005. Yields of UK crops and livestock: physiological and technological constraints, and expectations of progress to 2050’. DEFRA Project No. IS0210. Final Report, 21 pp, UK.Google Scholar