Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T17:20:44.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 4 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor variants combined effect on schizophrenia susceptibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2013

Xue-xi Yang
Affiliation:
School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
An-na Zhu
Affiliation:
School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Fen-xia Li
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Da An Gene Co., Ltd, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Zhong-xiang Zhang
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Da An Gene Co., Ltd, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Ming Li*
Affiliation:
School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
*
Ming Li, Professor, School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, P.R. China. Tel: +86 20 61648550; Fax: +86 20 61648554; E-mail: mingli2006_2006@126.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the relationships between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in NOTCH4 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) with schizophrenia among Han Chinese in Southern China.

Methods

Two NOTCH4 SNPs (rs520688 and rs415929) and two BDNF SNPs (rs2030324 and rs12273539) were examined in 464 schizophrenics and 464 healthy controls from Hunan province in South China, using the Sequenom MassARRAY® iPLEX System.

Results

In the study population, rs520688 and rs2030324 were significantly associated with schizophrenia. A decreased risk of schizophrenia was associated with the rs520688 GA genotype (p = 0.035), whereas an increased risk of schizophrenia was associated with the rs2030324 CC/CT genotype (p = 0.044). The genotype distributions of rs415929 in NOTCH4 and rs12273539 in BDNF did not differ significantly between the case and control groups. Although no allele–allele interactions were detected between rs520688 and rs2030324, recombination analysis revealed a combined effect of the two on the susceptibility to schizophrenia, with GA-TT decreasing and CT/CC-GG/GA increasing the risk of schizophrenia.

Conclusion

In conclusion, rs520688 in NOTCH4 and rs2030324 in BDNF are significantly associated with schizophrenia among Han Chinese in Southern China. The two had a combined effect on the susceptibility to schizophrenia among Han Chinese in Southern China, but this may not be caused by an allele–allele interaction.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2013 

Significant outcomes

  • rs520688 in NOTCH4 is associated with the susceptibility of schizophrenia.

  • rs2030324 in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is associated with the susceptibility of schizophrenia.

  • rs520688 and rs203032 have combined effects on the susceptibility to schizophrenia but this is not caused by allele–allele interaction.

Limitations

  • To further validate these results, more case and control samples are needed.

  • Further investigations into the functional consequence of NOTCH4 and BDNF on schizophrenia would be very interesting.

  • The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may act in haplotypes, and analyses of more SNPs are needed.

Introduction

Schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder with a lifetime prevalence rate of 1% in the general population worldwide (Reference Eaton1,Reference Sartorius, Jablensky and Korten2). As the illness places heavy economic and social burdens on families and society, it is important to establish ways to treat and prevent schizophrenia. However, the pathogenesis of schizophrenia is unclear. Although there are clearly environmental contributors to the disease, genetic predisposition is the major determinant of who develops schizophrenia, with heritability estimates as high as 80% (Reference Cardno and Gottesman3,Reference Sullivan, Kendler and Neale4), placing schizophrenia among the most heritable of common diseases. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and candidate gene approaches to schizophrenia have produced many positive results (Reference Ripke, Sanders and Kendler5), but most of these have poor reproducibility. Several studies have shown that NOTCH4 and BDNF are associated with the pathophysiology of schizophrenia (Reference Wei and Hemmings6Reference Watanabe, Nunokawa, Kaneko and Someya11). In the first association study (Reference Wei and Hemmings6), we found that NOTCH4 polymorphisms were associated with the risk of schizophrenia in British patients. Associations between NOTCH4 and schizophrenia were replicated in other studies (Reference Glatt, Wang, Yeh, Tsuang and Faraone7Reference Shibata, Ohnuma and Hiqashi9); however, the results of these studies are inconsistent across geographic regions. Furthermore, GWAS and meta-analyses revealed that NOTCH4 SNPs are associated with schizophrenia (Reference Ikeda, Aleksic and Kinoshita12).

BDNF is another well-defined schizophrenia-related gene. Decreased BDNF concentrations have been found in the cortical areas and the hippocampus of schizophrenics (Reference Durany, Michel and Zöchling13), and the concentration is also associated with the treatment of schizophrenia (Reference Pedrini, Chendo and Grande14). SNPs in BDNF have been shown to play an important role in structural and functional plasticity in schizophrenia and are potential markers for schizophrenia prevention and target therapy (Reference Favalli, Li, Belmonte-de-Abreu, Wong and Daskalakis15). Both BDNF and NOTCH4 are involved in neural development; however, there is no report of a direct relationship between the two proteins.

To investigate the relationship between polymorphisms in NOTCH4 and BDNF and schizophrenia, four SNPs (rs520688, rs415929, rs2030324, and rs12273539) in NOTCH4 and BDNF were examined in a Han Chinese population from southern China, using the MassARRAY iPLEX platform. Gene–gene interactions were explored and a genotype recombination analysis was performed.

Materials and methods

Subjects

The subjects who participated in our study were recruited between July 2008 and September 2011 from Xiangya Hospital, Xiangya, Hunan Province, China. All participants were permanent residents of Hunan from the Han Chinese population. Clinical information on each subject was collected from medical records.

The study recruited 470 patients with schizophrenia diagnosed by psychiatrists using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10), and the Chinese Classification and Diagnostic Criteria of Mental Disorders, 2nd Revision (CCMD-II-R). Blood samples were collected from the subjects. As genotyping failed for six samples, 464 case subjects were included in the final analysis. Their ages ranged from 16 to 62 years. In addition, blood samples were collected from 464 healthy controls selected randomly from outpatients ranging in age from 18 to 68 years, during the same period with no history of schizophrenia or other mental disease.

The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from the guardians of the participants.

DNA extraction

Peripheral blood samples were drawn from the participants at Xiangya Hospital, Xiangya, Hunan Province, China. The samples were delivered frozen by express mail to the School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China, and stored at −70°C. Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 μl of peripheral blood using a Genomic DNA Purification kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions and stored at −70°C until use.

Genotyping

All SNPs were genotyped using the Sequenom MassARRAY matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA). Primers were designed using a semi-automated method (Assay Design 3.1, Sequenom). The primer sequences are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 PCR primers designed using Sequenom MassARRAY Assay Design 3.1

PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Statistical analyses

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for the four SNPs in the control group was assessed using Haploview 4.2 (Daly Lab, Cambridge, MA, USA). Differences in genotype distributions between the cases and controls were evaluated by χ2 analysis. Associations between the polymorphisms and risk of schizophrenia were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) with binary logistic regression analyses, controlling for age and sex as covariates. Their associations with schizophrenia were analysed using the web-based tool SNPStats (http://bioinfo.iconcologia.net/SNPstats). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Allele–allele interactions were tested by logic regression cross-validation and combination analyses between rs520688 and rs2030324 with an overall χ2 test in a logistic regression.

Results

After adjusting for age and gender, all SNPs were in HWE, except rs520688, which was out of HWE for both the patients and controls. The distributions of the rs415929, rs520688, rs2030324, and rs12273539 polymorphisms in the schizophrenia and control groups are shown in Table 2. For BDNF rs2030324, the case group was 33.3% TT and 66.7% CT-CC, which differed significantly from the controls (39.7% TT and 60.3% CT-CC). The CC/CT genotype in rs2030324 increased the risk of schizophrenia with an OR of 1.34 (95% CI, 1.01–1.78, p = 0.044). For NOTCH4 rs520688, the case group was 79.9% AA-GG and 20.1% GA, which differed significantly from the controls (72.8% AA-GG and 27.2% GA). The GA genotype of rs520688 (p = 0.035) decreased the risk of schizophrenia with an OR of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.51–0.98, p = 0.035). The genotype distributions of rs415929 in NOTCH4 and rs12273539 in BDNF did not differ significantly between the case and control groups.

Table 2 Distribution of the rs415929, rs520688, rs2030324, and rs12273539 polymorphisms in schizophrenia and control groups

OR, odds ratio.

Bold values indicate p < 0.05.

Gene–gene combinations can be tested using an overall χ2-test in a logistic regression (Reference Pierri, Volk, Auh, Sampson and Lewis16). Recombination of rs520688 and rs2030324 was analysed using this method. There was a significant difference (χ2 = 12.461, p = 0.006); AA/GG-CT/CC increased the risk of schizophrenia with an OR of 1.424 (p = 0.022, 95% CI = 1.051–1.398; Table 3).

Table 3 Combination analysis of rs520688 and rs2030324 between the case and control groups

OR, odds ratio.

aOR (95% CI) was adjusted for age.

Bold value indicate p < 0.05.

If two SNPs have a combined effect, it might arise because they have a biological interaction, which can be tested using logic regression cross-validation (Reference Pierri, Volk, Auh, Sampson and Lewis16). As both BDNF and NOTCH4 are involved in neural development, there may be an interaction between NOTCH4 rs520688 and BDNF rs2030324. To confirm this hypothesis, the risk of rs520688 and rs2030324 and the interaction between rs520688 and rs2030324 were analysed using logic regression cross-validation; however, no significant result was obtained (χ2 = 0.933, p = 0.334; Table 4).

Table 4 Allele–allele interaction analysis between rs520688 and rs2030324 (χ2 = 12.461, p = 0.006)

OR, odds ratio.

aOR (95% CI) was adjusted for age.

The bold values indicate p < 0.05.

Discussion

NOTCH4, which is located on chromosome 6p21.3, is associated with neuronal development. The genetic knockout of NOTCH4 and NOTCH1 leads to abnormal vascular morphogenesis in mouse embryos (Reference Krebs, Xue and Norton17). BDNF, which is located on chromosome 11p13, is expressed in neurons and endothelial cells during development (Reference Lee, Duan and Mattson18). During the development of the cerebral cortex and hippocampus, BDNF induces the differentiation of neural stem cells into neurons and promotes the survival of newly generated neurons (Reference Barnabé-Heider and Miller19,Reference Cheng, Wang, Cai, Rao and Mattson20). BDNF expression in endothelial cells is involved in neurogenesis in the canary song system (Reference Louissaint, Rao, Leventhal and Goldman21). BDNF also plays an important role in preventing the death of neurons during development, and it promotes cell survival under stressful conditions (Reference Larsson, Nanobashvili, Kokaia and Lindvall22).

Studies show that schizophrenia is related to a reduction in the soma of prefrontal cortex neurons (Reference Benes23Reference Fatemi and Folsom25). In addition, the distribution of neurons in the prefrontal cortex is altered in schizophrenia, with fewer surface white matter and grey matter neurons and more deep white matter neurons (Reference Benes, Todtenkopf and Taylor26,Reference Schmidt-Kastner, Van Os, Wm Steinbusch and Schmitz27). Numerous studies have shown that schizophrenia involves apoptosis via an abnormal pathway, changing the apoptotic activity of neurons and glial cells (Reference Glantz, Gilmore, Lieberman and Jarskog28,Reference Honig and Rosenberg29). BDNF and NOTCH4 are expressed in neurons and endothelial cells during development and are closely related to neuron development. BDNF and NOTCH4 SNPs are associated with the susceptibility of individuals to schizophrenia (Reference Wei and Hemmings6Reference Ikeda, Aleksic and Kinoshita12). However, schizophrenia is caused by the interaction of many genes and environmental factors. To study the association between susceptibility genes and schizophrenia, it is insufficient to analyse just one SNP in a single gene, as this cannot describe the exact relationship between the disease and the gene. Analyses of SNP–SNP, gene–gene, and gene–environment interactions are also necessary. This study examined NOTCH4 and BDNF as candidate genes and SNPs as genetic markers in a case–control study using correlation analysis to analyse the relationship between polymorphisms in NOTCH4 and BDNF and schizophrenia. Four SNPs (rs520688 and rs415929 in NOTCH4 and rs2030324 and rs12273539 in BDNF) were genotyped in 464 schizophrenics and 464 healthy controls from Southern China using the Sequenom MassARRAY® iPLEX platform. Of these four SNPs, rs520688 in NOTCH4 and rs2030324 in BDNF were significantly associated, whereas rs415929 and rs12273539 had no associations with schizophrenia in our study population. Furthermore, there were significant differences in the combinations of genotypes and model testing. The AA/GG-CC/CT genotype was more frequent in the cases, indicating that it is a risk marker for schizophrenia. If two SNPs interact, this may be caused by a biological interaction; however, no significant allele–allele interaction was found between rs520688 and rs2030324. Consequently, the combined effect of rs520688 and rs2030324 may not be caused by a functional interaction between NOTCH4 and BDNF.

The combined effects of rs520688 and rs2030324 on the susceptibility to schizophrenia imply that NOTCH4 and BDNF are closely linked to schizophrenia. These results may not only help to reveal the mechanism of action of NOTCH4 and BDNF in schizophrenia, but also provide data for developing individualised therapy for schizophrenia.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Key Programmes for Science and Technology Development of Guangzhou (Grant no. 2008A1-E4151). The authors express their deepest gratitude to all the patients and healthy controls who agreed to participate in this study.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

1.Eaton, WW. Update on the epidemiology of schizophrenia. Epidemiol Rev 1991;13:320328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Sartorius, N, Jablensky, A, Korten, Aet al. Early manifestation and first contact incidence of schizophrenia in different cultures. Psychol Med 1986;16:909928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Cardno, AG, Gottesman, II. Twin studies of SCZ: from bow-and-arrow concordances to star wars Mx and functional genomics. Am J Med Genet 2000;97:1217.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Sullivan, PF, Kendler, KS, Neale, MC. SCZ as a complex trait: evidence from a meta-analysis of twin studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:11871192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Ripke, S, Sanders, AR, Kendler, KSet al. Genome-wide association study identifies five new schizophrenia loci. Nat Genet 2011;43:969976.Google Scholar
6.Wei, J, Hemmings, GP. The Notch4 locus is associated with susceptibility to schizophrenia. Nat Genet 2000;25:376377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Glatt, SJ, Wang, RS, Yeh, YC, Tsuang, MT, Faraone, SV. Five NOTCH4 polymorphisms show weak evidence for association with schizophrenia: evidence from meta-analyses. Schizophr Res 2005;73:281290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Luo, X, Klempan, TA, Lappalainen, Jet al. NOTCH4 gene haplotype is associated with schizophrenia in African Americans. Biol Psychiatry 2004;55:112117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Shibata, N, Ohnuma, T, Hiqashi, Set al. Genetic association between Notch4 polymorphisms and Japanese schizophrenics. Psychiatr Gen 2006;16:7779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Yi, Z, Zhang, C, Wu, Zet al. Lack of effect of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism on early onset schizophrenia in Chinese Han population. Brain Res 2011;1417:146150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Watanabe, Y, Nunokawa, A, Kaneko, N, Someya, T. Meta-analysis of case–control association studies between the C270T polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene and schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2007;95:250252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Ikeda, M, Aleksic, B, Kinoshita, Yet al. Genome-wide association study of schizophrenia in a Japanese population. Biol Psychiatry 2011;69:472478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Durany, N, Michel, T, Zöchling, Ret al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin in schizophrenic psychoses. Schizophr Res 2001;52:7986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Pedrini, M, Chendo, I, Grande, Iet al. Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor and clozapine daily dose in patients with schizophrenia: a positive correlation. Neurosci Lett 2011;491:207210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Favalli, G, Li, J, Belmonte-de-Abreu, P, Wong, AH, Daskalakis, ZJ. The role of BDNF in the pathophysiology and treatment of schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 2012;46:111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Pierri, JN, Volk, CL, Auh, S, Sampson, A, Lewis, DA. Somal size of prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons in schizophrenia; differential effects across neuronal subpopulations. Biol Psychiatry 2003;54:111120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Krebs, LT, Xue, Y, Norton, CRet al. Notch signaling is essential for vascular morphogenesis in mice. Genes Dev 2000;14:13431352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Lee, J, Duan, W, Mattson, MP. Evidence that brain-derived neurotrophic factor is required for basal neurogenesis and mediates, in part, the enhancement of neurogenesis by dietary restriction in the hippocampus of adult mice. J Neurochem 2002;82:13671375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Barnabé-Heider, F, Miller, FD. Endogenously produced neurotrophins regulate survival and differentiation of cortical progenitors via distinct signaling pathways. J Neurosci 2003;23:51495160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Cheng, A, Wang, S, Cai, J, Rao, MS, Mattson, MP. Nitric oxide acts in a positive feedback loop with BDNF to regulate neural progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation in the mammalian brain. Dev Biol 2003;258:319333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Louissaint, JA, Rao, S, Leventhal, C, Goldman, SA. Coordinated interaction of neurogenesis and angiogenesis in the adult songbird brain. Neuron 2002;34:945960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Larsson, E, Nanobashvili, A, Kokaia, Z, Lindvall, O. Evidence for neuroprotective effects of endogenous brain-derived neurotrophic factor after global forebrain ischemia in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999;19:12201228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Benes, FM. Neurobiological investigations in cingulate cortex of schizophrenic brain. Schizophr Bull 1993;19:537549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Garey, L. When cortical development goes wrong: schizophrenia as a neurodevelopmental disease of microcircuits. J Anat 2010;217:324333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Fatemi, SH, Folsom, TD. The neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia, revisited. Schizophr Bull 2009;35:528548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Benes, FM, Todtenkopf, MS, Taylor, JB. Differential distribution of tyrosine hydroxylase fibers on small and large neurons in layer II of anterior cingulate cortex of schizophrenic brain. Synapse 1997;25:8092.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Schmidt-Kastner, R, Van Os, J, Wm Steinbusch, H, Schmitz, C. Gene regulation by hypoxia and the neurodevelopmental origin of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2006;84:253271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Glantz, LA, Gilmore, JH, Lieberman, JA, Jarskog, LF. Apoptotic mechanisms and the synaptic pathology of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2006;81:4763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Honig, LS, Rosenberg, RN. Apoptosis and neurologic disease. Am J Med 2000;108:317330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 PCR primers designed using Sequenom MassARRAY Assay Design 3.1

Figure 1

Table 2 Distribution of the rs415929, rs520688, rs2030324, and rs12273539 polymorphisms in schizophrenia and control groups

Figure 2

Table 3 Combination analysis of rs520688 and rs2030324 between the case and control groups

Figure 3

Table 4 Allele–allele interaction analysis between rs520688 and rs2030324 (χ2 = 12.461, p = 0.006)