![](https://assets-cambridge-org.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/97810091/53546/cover/9781009153546.jpg)
Book contents
- Effective Domestic Remedies and the European Court of Human Rights
- Effective Domestic Remedies and the European Court of Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Citations of Case Law
- Abbreviations
- 1 Setting the Scene
- 2 Analysis and Selection of Case Law
- 3 The Requirement of Effectiveness in Abstract
- 4 Historical and Statistical Overview
- 5 Relationship with the Rule on Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies
- 6 Scope of Application
- 7 The Arguability Test
- 8 A Relative Standard
- 9 General Requirements and Principles
- 10 Access to Justice
- 11 Redress
- 12 A Normative and Contextual Reading
- 13 Conclusions and Recommendations
- Bibliography
- Index
13 - Conclusions and Recommendations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 August 2022
- Effective Domestic Remedies and the European Court of Human Rights
- Effective Domestic Remedies and the European Court of Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Citations of Case Law
- Abbreviations
- 1 Setting the Scene
- 2 Analysis and Selection of Case Law
- 3 The Requirement of Effectiveness in Abstract
- 4 Historical and Statistical Overview
- 5 Relationship with the Rule on Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies
- 6 Scope of Application
- 7 The Arguability Test
- 8 A Relative Standard
- 9 General Requirements and Principles
- 10 Access to Justice
- 11 Redress
- 12 A Normative and Contextual Reading
- 13 Conclusions and Recommendations
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Chapter 13 summarizes important findings and offer two recommendations to the Court with regard to how Article 13 could be developed: (1) The Court should engage in more and stricter procedural review by controlling and setting out requirements with regard to how domestic remedial authorities must consider whether the Convention has been violated. To this end, the Court should make more use of Article 13. The counterpart of the increased procedural review should be less substantive review. (2) The Court should engage in more principled and abstract reasoning concerning Article 13, in particular the required form of redress. More principled and abstract reasoning stands in contrast to concreteness. It provides guidance, but allows for flexible implementation in different domestic legal systems.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Effective Domestic Remedies and the European Court of Human RightsApplications of the European Convention on Human Rights Article 13, pp. 277 - 300Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022