Book contents
- Democracy’s Resilience to Populism’s Threat
- Democracy’s Resilience to Populism’s Threat
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Populist Threat to Democracy
- 2 How Institutional Constraints and Conjunctural Opportunities Condition Populism’s Threat to Democracy
- 3 Neoliberal and Right-Wing Populism in Latin America
- 4 “Bolivarian” and Left-Wing Populism in Latin America
- 5 Right-Wing and Traditionalist Populism in Europe
- 6 Right-Wing Populism in the USA
- 7 Conclusion
- References
- Index
4 - “Bolivarian” and Left-Wing Populism in Latin America
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 January 2024
- Democracy’s Resilience to Populism’s Threat
- Democracy’s Resilience to Populism’s Threat
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Populist Threat to Democracy
- 2 How Institutional Constraints and Conjunctural Opportunities Condition Populism’s Threat to Democracy
- 3 Neoliberal and Right-Wing Populism in Latin America
- 4 “Bolivarian” and Left-Wing Populism in Latin America
- 5 Right-Wing and Traditionalist Populism in Europe
- 6 Right-Wing Populism in the USA
- 7 Conclusion
- References
- Index
Summary
This chapter documents the restrictive conditions under which leftwing, “Bolivarian” populism managed to destroy democracy in Latin America. Only Hugo Chavez of Venezuela (1999–2013), Evo Morales of Bolivia (2006–2019), and Rafael Correa of Ecuador (2007–2017) accomplished this feat because they benefited from the high instability plaguing their countries’ presidential systems and, at the same time, from the enormous hydrocarbon revenues provided by the global commodities boom. By distributing massive benefits to ample population sectors, they won overwhelming political support, which they leveraged for dismantling the remaining, already battered checks and balances. By contrast, presidents who did not benefit from such a huge windfall or who governed in countries not suffering from high institutional instability did not manage to still their power hunger and asphyxiate democracy. Instead, some of these leftwing populists suffered irregular evictions from office, whereas others managed to serve out their terms, but failed to perpetuate themselves in power and strangle democracy.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Democracy's Resilience to Populism's ThreatCountering Global Alarmism, pp. 117 - 158Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024