Phenomenology

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.012

10 - Phenomenology

from READER-ORIENTED THEORIES OF INTERPRETATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Robert Holub

Edited by

Raman Selden

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

‘Phenomenology’ is usually used to designate a major movement in twentieth-century philosophy. The word itself stems from the Greek verb ‘phaino’ meaning ‘to bring to light’ or ‘to make to appear’, and has the literal meaning of ‘science of appearances’. It was first used by the German philosopher Johann Heinrich Lambert (1728–1777) in his Neues Organon (1764); Lambert, however, considered phenomena to be illusions and thus his notion of phenomenology was a science of illusions. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) employs the word in his natural philosophy to distinguish the study of the realm of appearances for us (phenomena) from the study of the realm of essences or things as they are in themselves (noumena). In Hegel's (1770–1831) philosophy, which denies this Kantian division, phenomenology refers to different appearances of consciousness; the Phenomenology of Mind (1807) describes the various stages of human consciousness as it comes to complete awareness of itself. Later in the nineteenth century, particularly in the writings of Eduard von Hartmann (1842–1906) and C. S. Peirce (1839–1914), the term becomes associated with the study of facts or things as they really are. Only in the early part of the twentieth century, however, in the writings of Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) did phenomenology become a designation for a philosophical school. Today the term is usually identified with Husserl, his students, or the various philosophers who were influenced by Husserl's work. In discussions of literature two distinct tendencies emanate from phenomenology. and poetics, was developed centrally by Husserl's own students, especially the Polish phenomenologist Roman Ingarden (1895-1970); the other, a more practical direction involving literary criticism, is associated with the work of the Geneva School in the middle of the century.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 289 - 318

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachelard, Gaston, Fragments d'une poétique du feu (Paris, 1988).Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston, L'Air et les songes (Paris, 1943).Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston, L'Eau et les rêves (Paris, 1942); Water and Dreams: An Essay on the Imagination of Matter, trans. Farrell, Edith R. (Dallas, 1983).Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston, La Poétique de I'espace (Paris, 1957); The Poetics of Space, trans. Jolas, Maria (Boston, 1964).Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston, La Poétique de la Rêverie (Paris, 1960); The Poetics of Reverie: Childhood, Language and the Cosmos, trans. Russell, Daniel (Boston, 1969).Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston, La Psychanalyse du feu (Paris, 1938); The Psychoanalysis of Fire, trans. Ross, Alan C. M. (Boston, 1964).Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston, On Poetic Imagination and Reverie: Selections from the Works of Gaston Bachelard, trans. Gaudin, Colette (Indianapolis, 1971).Google Scholar

Bataille, George, Histoire de Voeil (Paris, 1967); Story of the Eye, trans. Neugroschel, Joachim (New York, 1977).Google Scholar

Bataille, George, L'Erotisme (Paris, 1957); Eroticism: Death and Sensuality, trans. Dalwood, Mary (San Francisco, 1972).Google Scholar

Bataille, George, L'Expérience intérieure (Paris, 1954); Inner Experience, trans. Boldt, Leslie Anne (Albany, 1988).Google Scholar

Bataille, George, La Littérature et le mal (Paris, 1957); Literature and Evil trans. Hamilton, Alastaire (London, 1973).Google Scholar

Bataille, George, Visions of Excess: Selected Writings 1927–1939, trans. Stoekl, Allan (Minneapolis, 1985).Google Scholar

Béguin, Albert, L'Ame romantique et le rêve: essai sur la romantisme allemand et la poésie francaise, 2 vols. (Marseilles, 1937).Google Scholar

Blanchot, Maurice, L'Entretien infini (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar

Blanchot, Maurice, L'Espace littéraire (Paris, 1955); The Space of Literature, trans. Smock, Ann (Lincoln, 1982).Google Scholar

Blanchot, Maurice, Lautréamont et Sade (Paris, 1949).Google Scholar

Blanchot, Maurice, The Gaze of Orpheus and Other Literary Essays, trans. Davis, Lydia (Barrytown, NY, 1981).Google Scholar

Blanchot, Maurice, The Sirens' Song: Selected Essays, trans. Rabinovitch, Sacha (Brighton, 1982).Google Scholar

Man, Paul, Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism, 2nd ed. (London, 1983).Google Scholar

Bové, Paul A., Destructive Poetics: Heidegger and Modern American Poetry (New York, 1976).Google Scholar

Brodtkorb, Paul, Ishmael's White Whale: A Phenomenological Reading of ‘Moby Dick’, (New Haven, 1965).Google Scholar

Caws, Mary Ann, Surrealism and the Literary Imagination: A Study of Breton and Bachelard (The Hague, 1966).CrossRef Google Scholar

Christofides, G. C. ‘Bachelard's aesthetics’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 20 (1962).CrossRef Google Scholar

Christofides, G. C., ‘Gaston Bachelard's phenomenology of the imagination’, Romantic Review, 52 (1961).Google Scholar

Collin, Françhise, Critique, 20 (1964), [On Merleau-Ponty].

Collin, Françhise, Maurice Blanchot et la question de Vécriture (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar

Conrad, Waldemar, ‘Der ästhetische Gegenstand: Eine ph¨nomenologische Studie’, Zeitschriftfur Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, 3 (1908) and 4 (1909).Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, ‘Force et signification’, Critique, 19 (1963).Google Scholar

Descombes, Vincent, Modern French Philosophy, trans. Scott-Fox, L. and Harding, J. M. (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar

Detweiler, Robert, Story, Sign, and Self: Phenomenology and Structuralism as Literary Critical Methods (Philadelphia, 1978).Google Scholar

Donato, Eugenio, ‘Language, vision and phenomenology: Merleau-Ponty as a test case’, Modern Language Notes, 85 (1970).Google Scholar

Douglas, Kenneth, ‘Blanchot and Sartre’, Yale French Studies, 2 (1949).Google Scholar

Dubrovsky, Serge, Pourquoi la nouvelle critique (Paris, 1966).Google Scholar

Dufrenne, Mikel, ‘On the phenomenology and semiology of art’, Phenomenology and Natural Existence, ed. Riepe, Dale (Albany, 1973).Google Scholar

Dufrenne, Mikel, Esthétique et philosophic, 3 vols. (Paris: 1967–1981).Google Scholar

Dufrenne, Mikel, In the Presence of the Sensuous: Essays in Aesthetics, trans. Roberts, Mark S. and Gallagher, Dennis (Atlantic Highlands, 1987).Google Scholar

Dufrenne, Mikel, Le poétique (Paris, 1963).Google Scholar

Dufrenne, Mikel, Phénoménologie de Vexpérience esthétique (Paris, 1952); The Phenom enology of Aesthetic Experience, trans. Casey, Edward S. (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar

Ehrmann, Jacques, ‘Introduction to Gaston Bachelard’, Modern Language Notes 81 (1966).Google Scholar

Falk, Eugene H., The Poetics of Roman Ingarden (Chapel Hill, 1981).Google Scholar

Farber, Marvin, The Aims of Phenomenology: The Motives, Methods, and Impact of Husserl's Thought (New York, 1966).Google Scholar

Gagey, J., Gaston Bachelard ou la conversion à Vimaginaire (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar

Gaudin, Colette, ‘LTmagination et la rêverie: remarques sur la poétique de Gaston Bachelard’, Symposium, 20 (1966).Google Scholar

Geiger, Moritz, ‘Beiträge zur Phänomenologie des ästhetischen Genusses’, Jahrbuch für Philosophic und phänomenologische Forschung, 1 (1913).Google Scholar

Geiger, Moritz, Die Bedeutung der Kunst: Zugänge zu einer materialen Wertästhetik, ed. Berger, Klaus and Henckmann, Wolfhart (Munich, 1976). (Collection of published and unpublished writings on aesthetics.)

Ginestier, Paul, La Pensée de Bachelard (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar

Gras, Vernon W., European Literary Theory and Practice: From Existential Phenomenology o Structuralism (New York, 1973).Google Scholar

Grossmann, Reinhardt, Phenomenology and Existentialism: An Introduction (London, 1984).Google Scholar

Hartmann, Geoffrey, ‘The fulness and nothingness of literature’, Yale French Studies, 16 (1955).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Der Ursprung des Kunstwerks (Stuttgart, 1960).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Erläuterungen zu Hölderlins Dichtung (Frankfurt, 1944; 4th expanded edn 1971)Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt, 1976–).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Holzwege (Frankfurt, 1950).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. Hofstadter, Albert (New York, 1971).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Unterwegs zur Sprache (Pfullingen, 1959); On the Way to Language, trans. Hertz, Peter D. (New York, 1971).Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund, Cartesianische Meditationen: Eine Einleitung in die Phänomenologie (The Hague, 1950); Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans. Cairns, Dorion (The Hague, 1960).Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phanomenologie (Bel grade, 1936); The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. Carr, David (Evanston, 1970).Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund, Husserliana: Gesammelte Werke ed. Breda, H. L. (The Hague, 1950–). Collected Works (1980–).Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie undphänomenologischen Philosophic (Halle, 1913); Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, trans. Gibson, W. R. Boyce (New York, 1931).Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund, Logische Untersuchungen, 2 vols. (Halle, 1900 and 1901); Logical Investigations, trans Findlay, F. J., 2 vols. (New York, 1970).Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund, Shorter Works (Brighton, 1981).Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund, The Idea of Phenomenology, trans. Alston, William P. and Nakhnikian, George (The Hague, 1964).Google Scholar

Hyppolite, Jean, Sens et existence dans la philosophic de Maurice Merleau-Ponty (Oxford, 1963).Google Scholar

Ingarden, Roman, Das literarische Kunstwerk (Tübingen, 1930); The Literary Work of Art, trans. Grabowicz, George G. (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar

Ingarden, Roman, Selected Papers in Aesthetics (Washington, 1985).Google Scholar

Ingarden, Roman, The Work of Music and the Problem of Its Identity, trans. Czerniawski, Adam (Berkeley, 1986).CrossRef Google Scholar

Ingarden, Roman, Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks (Tübingen, 1968); The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art, trans. Crowly, Ruth Ann and Olson, Kenneth R. (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar

Johnson, Bruce, True Correspondence: A Phenomenology of Thomas Hardy's Novels (Tallahassee, 1983).Google Scholar

Kaelin, Eugene F., An Existentialist Aesthetic: The Theories of Sartre and Merleau-Ponty (Madison, 1962).Google Scholar

Kockelmans, Joseph J. (ed.), Phenomenology: The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Its Interpretation (New York, 1967).Google Scholar

Krenzlin, Norbert, Das Werk “rein für sich": Zur Geschichte des Verhältnisses von Phänomenologie, Ästhetik und Literaturwissenschaft (Berlin, 1979).Google Scholar

Kushner, Eva M., ‘The critical method of Gaston Bachelard’, in Slote, Bernice (ed.), Myth and Symbol (Lincoln, NE, 1963).Google Scholar

Lawall, Sarah N., Critics of Consciousness: The Existential Structures of Literature (Cambridge, MA, 1968).CrossRef Google Scholar

Lecourt, Dominique, Marxism and Epistemology: Bachelard, Canguilhem and Foucault (London, 1975).Google Scholar

Leibfried, Erwin, Kritische Wissenschaft vom Text: Manipulation. Reflexion, transparente Poetologie (Stuttgart, 1970).CrossRef Google Scholar

Lentricchia, Frank, After the New Criticism: (Chicago, 1980).Google Scholar

LeSage, Laurent (ed.), The French New Criticism: An Introduction and a Sampler (University Park, 1967).Google Scholar

Levinas, Emmanuel, Sur Maurice Blanchot (Montpellier, 1975).Google Scholar

Lewis, Philip E., ‘Merleau-Ponty and the phenomenology of language’, Yale French Studies, 36–37 (1966).Google Scholar

Liberstson, Joseph, Proximity, Levinas, Blanchot, Bataille, and Consciousness (The Hague, 1982).CrossRef Google Scholar

Magliola, Robert R., Phenomenology and Literature: An Introduction (West Lafayette, IN, 1977).Google Scholar

Magowan, Robin, ‘Jean-Pierre Richard and the criticism of sensation’, Criticism, 6 (1964).Google Scholar

Mansuy, Michel, Gaston Bachelard et les éléments (Paris, 1967).Google Scholar

Margolin, Jean Claude, Bachelard (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, ‘Le Primat de la perception et ses conséquences philosophiques’, Bulletin de la Société Française de Philosophie, 41 (1947), 1197ndash;53.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, L'Oeil et l'esprit (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Le Visible et l'invisible: suivi de notes de travail (Paris, 1964); The Visible and the Invisible, trans. Lingis, Alphonso (Evanston, 1968).Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Ph7eacute;noménologie de la perception (Paris, 1945); Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Smith, Colin (New York, 1962).Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Sens et non-sens (Paris, 1948); Sense and Nonsense, trans. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Dreyfus, Patricia Allen (Evanston, 1964).Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Signes (Paris, 1960); Signs, trans. McCleary, Richard C. (Evanston, 1964).Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, The Essential Writings of Merleau-Ponty, ed. Fisher, Alden L. (New York, 1969).Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology (Evanston, 1964).Google Scholar

Métraux, Alexandre, ‘Zur phänomenologischenÄsthetik Moritz Geigers’, Studia Philosophica, 28 (1968).Google Scholar

Miller, J. Hillis ‘Geneva or Paris: the recent work of Georges Poulet’, University of Toronto Quarterly, 39 (1970).CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, J. Hillis ‘The Geneva School: the criticism of Marcel Raymond, Albert Béguin, Georges Poulet, Jean Rousset, Jean-Pierre Richard, and Jean Starobinski’, Critical Quarterly, 8 (1966).CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, J. Hillis, ‘The literary criticism of Georges Poulet’, Modern Language Notes, 78 (1963).Google Scholar

Miller, J. Hillis, Charles Dickens: The World of His Novels (Cambridge, MA, 1958).Google Scholar

Miller, J. Hillis, Poets of Reality (Cambridge, MA, 1965).Google Scholar

Miller, J. Hillis, The Disappearance of God (Cambridge, MA, 1963).Google Scholar

Miller, J. ‘But are things as we think they are?’ Times Literary Supplement (9–15 October 1987).Google Scholar

Oxenhandler, Neal, ‘Paradox and negation in the criticism of Maurice Blanchot’, Symposium, 16 (1962).Google Scholar

Picon, Gaëtan, ‘L'Oeuvre critique de Maurice Blanchot’, Critique 14 (1956).Google Scholar

Pire, Francois, Del Imagination dans Voeuvre de Gaston Bachelard (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, ‘Bachelard et la critique contemporaine’, in Currents of Thought in French Literature (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, ‘Maurice Blanchot, critique et romancier’, Critique 22 (1966).Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, ‘Phenomenology of reading’, New Literary History, 1 (1969).CrossRef Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, ‘Poulet on Poulet: the self and the other in critical consciousness’, Diacritics, 2, no. 1 (1971).Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, Entre moi et moi: Essais critiques sur la conscience de soi (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, Etudes sur le temps humain (Edinburgh, 1949); Studies in Human Time, trans. Coleman, Elliott (Baltimore, 1959).Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, L'Espace proustien (Paris, 1963); Proustian Space, trans. Coleman, Elliott (Balti more, 1977).Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, La Distance intérieure: Etudes sur le temps humain II (Paris, 1952); The Interior Distance, trans. Coleman, Elliott (Baltimore, 1959).Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, La pensée indéterminée (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, La poésie éclatée: Baudelaire, Rimbaud (Paris, 1980); Exploding Poetry: Baudelaire, Rimbaud, trans. Meltzer, Francoise (Chicago, 1984).CrossRef Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, Le Point de départ: Etudes sur le temps humain III (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, Les Métemorphoses du cercle (Paris, 1961); The Metamorphoses of the Circle, trans. Dawson, Carley and Coleman, Elliott (Baltimore, 1967).Google Scholar

Poulet, Georges, Mesure de Vinstant: Etudes sur le temps humain IV (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar

Preli, Georges, La Force du dehors: extériorité, limit et nonpouvoir à partir de Maurice Blanchot (Fontenay-sous-Bris, 1977).Google Scholar

Quillet, Pierre, Gaston Bachelard (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar

Ray, William, Literary Meaning: From Phenomenology to Deconstruction (Oxford, 1984).Google Scholar

Ray, William, Research in Phenomenology, 10 (1980) [special issue on Merleau-Ponty].Google Scholar

Raymond, Marcel, De Baudelaire au surréalisme (Paris, 1933); From Baudelaire to Surrealism (New York, 1950).Google Scholar

Raymond, Marcel, Jean-Jacques Rousseau: la quête de soi et la rêverie (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar

Richard, Jean-Pierre, L'Univers imaginaire de Mallarmé (Paris, 1961).Google Scholar

Richard, Jean-Pierre, Littérature et sensation (Paris, 1954).Google Scholar

Richard, Jean-Pierre, Onze études sur la poésie moderne (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar

Richard, Jean-Pierre, Poésie et profundeur (Paris, 1955).Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul, Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology (Evanston, 1967).Google Scholar

Rousset, Jean, Forme et signification (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar

Rousset, Jean, L'Intérieure et l'extérieure: Essais sur la poésie et sur le théâtre du XVIIe siécle (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar

Rousset, Jean, La Littérature de Vâge baroque en France (Paris, 1953).Google Scholar

Said, Edward W., ‘Labyrinth of incarnations: the essays of Maurice Merleau- Ponty’, Kenyon Review, 29 (1967).Google Scholar

Sartre, Jean-Paul, Imagination, trans. Williams, F. (Ann Arbor, 1962).Google Scholar

Simon, John K. (ed.), Modern French Criticism: From Proust and Valeéy to Structuralism (Chicago, 1972).Google Scholar

Smith, Roch Charles, Gaston Bachelard (Boston, 1982).Google Scholar

Spanos, William V., Martin Heidegger and the Question of Literature (Bloomington, 1976).Google Scholar

Spiegelberg, Herbert, Les Temps Modernes, 17 (1961) [issue on Merleau-Ponty].Google Scholar

Spiegelberg, Herbert, The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction, 3rd rev. edn (The Hague, 1982).CrossRef Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean, ‘Consideration on the present state of literary criticism’, Diogenes, 74 (1971).Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean, ‘Criticism and authority’, Daedalus, 106, no. 4 (1977).Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean, ‘On the fundamental gestures of criticism’, New Literary History, 5 (1974).CrossRef Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean, Jean-Jacques Rousseau: la transparence et l'obstacle (Paris, 1957); Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (Chicago, 1988).Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean, L'Oeil vivant (Paris, 1961).Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean, La Relation critique: L'Oeil vivant 2 (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean, Montaigne en mouvement (Paris, 1982); Montaigne in Motion, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (Chicago, 1985).Google Scholar

Therrien, Vincent, La Révolution de Gaston Bachelard en critique littéaire (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar

Valdés, Mario J.Phenomenological Hermeneutic and the Study of Literature (Toronto, 1987).Google Scholar

Valdés, Mario J., Shadows in the Cave: A Phenomenological Approach to Literary Criticism Based on Hispanic Texts (Toronto, 1982).Google Scholar

Man, Paul, ‘Vérité et méthode dans l'oeuvre de George Poulet’, Critique, 25 (1969).Google Scholar

Zeltner, Hermann, ‘Moritz Geiger zum Gedachtnis’, Zeitschrift füosophische orschung, 7 (1960).Google Scholar

Book contents

10 - Phenomenology

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive