Book contents
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- Frontispiece
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Plates
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Scope, Scale and Humility in the History of International Law
- Part I The Historiography of International Law
- 2 A Thousand Flowers Blooming, or the Desert of the Real?
- 3 Political Thought and the Historiography of International Law
- 4 The Turn to the History of International Law in the Field of International Relations
- 5 Economic History and International Law
- Part II The Historiography of International Law
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
4 - The Turn to the History of International Law in the Field of International Relations
from Part I - The Historiography of International Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2024
Book contents
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- Frontispiece
- The Cambridge History of International Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Plates
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Scope, Scale and Humility in the History of International Law
- Part I The Historiography of International Law
- 2 A Thousand Flowers Blooming, or the Desert of the Real?
- 3 Political Thought and the Historiography of International Law
- 4 The Turn to the History of International Law in the Field of International Relations
- 5 Economic History and International Law
- Part II The Historiography of International Law
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
This chapter focuses on the recent (re)turn to history in scholarship of international relations (IR) on international law. We argue that two interrelated trends explain this development. The first is primarily internal to the field, where historically sensitive approaches have gained ground over the past thirty years. The second is external and the result of IR scholars’ productive engagement with debates in other fields, including global history, intellectual history and legal history. Although the new historical IR work on international law remains heavily indebted to histories produced outside the confines of the discipline, IR scholars at the vanguard of this movement are increasingly comfortable with writing histories themselves. New IR historical accounts have thus emerged, spanning broad subjects of international society, order and transformation, as well as specific areas of international law, including human rights, humanitarian law and international organisations. We review the history of the disciplinary divide between IR and legal history, outline how IR theoretical approaches have made use of history, highlight some of the thematic areas of the new IR historical work, and lay out possible future research directions.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of International Law , pp. 136 - 161Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Further Reading
Acharya, Amitav, Constructing Global Order. Agency and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkawi, Tarak, ‘From law to history: the politics of war and empire’, Global Constitutionalism, 7 (2018) 315–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Duvall, Raymond, Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Byers, Michael (ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics. Essays in International Relations and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000).Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim, and Reus-Smit, Cristian (eds.), The Globalization of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. The State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte (ed.), Against International Relations Norms. Postcolonial Perspectives (London and New York: Routledge 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M., Wars of Law. Unintended Consequences of the Regulation of Armed Conflict (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Jurkovich, Michelle, ‘Getting a seat at the table: the origins of universal participation and modern multilateral conferences’, Global Governance, 20 (2014) 361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization, 52 (1998) 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getachew, Adom, Worldmaking after Empire. The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O. and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Legalization and World Politics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2001).Google Scholar
Gong, Gerrit W., The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1984).Google Scholar
Grovogui, Siba N., Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans. Race and Self-Determination in International Law (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1996).Google Scholar
Keene, Edward, Beyond the Anarchical Society. Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., ‘International relations and international law: two optics’, Harvard International Law Journal, 38 (1999) 487–502.Google Scholar
Kinsella, Helen M., The Image before the Weapon. A Critical History of the Distinction between Combatant and Civilian (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsella, Helen M., and Mantilla, Giovanni, ‘Contestation before compliance: history, politics, and power in International Humanitarian Law’, International Studies Quarterly, 64 (2020) 649–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., Sovereignty. Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantilla, Giovanni, Lawmaking under Pressure. International Humanitarian Law and Internal Armed Conflict (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan A., ‘Global prohibition regimes: the evolution of norms in international society’, International Organization, 44 (1990) 479–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer, Boundaries of the International. Law and Empire (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian (ed.), The Politics of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard, Multilateralism Matters. The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form (New York: Columbia University Press 1993).Google Scholar
Schulz, Carsten-Andreas, ‘Civilisation, barbarism and the making of Latin America’s place in 19th-century international society’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42 (2014) 837–59.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn, Evidence for Hope. Making Human Rights Work in the 21st Century (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Gerry J., Great Powers and Outlaw States. Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanu, Maja, ‘The hierarchical society: the politics of self-determination and the constitution of new states after 1919’, European Journal of International Relations, 26 (2020) 372–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viola, Lora Anne, The Closure of the International System. How Institutions Create Political Equalities and Hierarchies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje E., Constitution and Contestation of Norms in Global International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar