Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-7g5wt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T14:24:08.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - The Mass Public’s View of Implicit Bias, with Implications for Scientific Communication in a Politically Polarized Age

from Section VII - The Public’s (Mis)understanding of Implicit Bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2024

Jon A. Krosnick
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Tobias H. Stark
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Amanda L. Scott
Affiliation:
The Strategy Team, Columbus, Ohio
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we examine the public’s understanding of implicit bias, a topic that has only recently caught the public’s attention. Given that political elites often set the contours of debate on political issues, we begin by conducting a systematic content analysis of newspaper headlines and cable news transcripts to assess the prevalence and nature of media coverage of implicit bias. We find that partisan media utilize starkly different frames regarding the scientific validity of the concept of implicit bias, the political intentions of those who use the phrase, and the requisite political recourses (if any). We then utilize two individual-level datasets to examine the mass public’s understanding of implicit bias. An original survey reveals a stark gulf in partisan understandings of implicit bias and an analysis of Project Implicit data highlights the interplay between personalized feedback from the IAT and ideology in shaping evaluations of the IAT. We conclude with a discussion of the challenges of science communication, particularly on issues relating to race, in a politically polarized age.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkes, H. R., & Tetlock, P. E. (2004). Attributions of implicit prejudice, or “Would Jesse Jackson ‘fail’ the Implicit Association Test?” Psychological Inquiry, 15(4), 257278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 547579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). Counteracting the politicization of science. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 745769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, A. M. (2021). The content of their coverage: Contrasting racially conservative and liberal elite rhetoric. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9(5), 935954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 14641480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, J. L., Gaither, S. E., & Ratliff, K. A. (2014). Caught in the middle: Defensive responses to IAT feedback among Whites, Blacks, and biracial Black/Whites. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 373381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. L., Redford, L., Pogge, G., et al. (2017). Defensive responding to IAT feedback. Social Cognition, 35(5), 520562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. (2016, September 28). Two days after the debate, Trump responds to Clinton’s comment on implicit bias. The Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/09/28/two-days-after-the-debate-trump-responds-to-clintons-comment-on-implicit-bias/Google Scholar
Kurdi, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Reports of the death of the individual difference approach to implicit social cognition may be greatly exaggerated: A commentary on Payne, Vuletich, and Lundberg. Psychological Inquiry, 28(4), 281287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28(4), 233248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swann, W. B. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In Sulis, J. and Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.), Social Psychological Perspectives on the Self. New York, NY: Erlbaum Associates, pp. 3366.Google Scholar
Yen, J., Durrheim, K., & Tafarodi, R. W. (2018). ‘I’m happy to own my implicit biases’: Public encounters with the Implicit Association Test. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(3), 505523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×