Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-686fd747b7-s9gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T12:52:18.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Online Dating

from Part III - Activities in Cyber Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2024

By
Sabrina A. Huang  and
Jeffrey Hancock
Edited by
Zheng Yan
Zheng Yan
Affiliation:
University at Albany, State University of New York
Get access

Summary

1 Introduction

2 Notable Scholars in Online Dating Research

 2.1 Self-Presentation, Impression Formation, and Self-Disclosure

 2.2 Deception in Online Dating

 2.3 Relationship Formation in Online Dating

 2.4 Online Dating Systems

3 Future Directions for Online Dating Research

Keywords

online datingself-presentationimpression formationself-disclosuredeceptionrelationship formationmate selectionmodality switchingonline dating systemsalgorithms
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Cyber Behavior , pp. 771 - 790
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003–066X.54.6.408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.94.2.245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2011). When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 1012–1032. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024062CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastwick, P. W., Keneski, E., Morgan, T. A., McDonald, M. A., & Huang, S. A. (2018). What do short-term and long-term relationships look like? Building the relationship coordination and strategic timing (ReCAST) model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(5), 747–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000428CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellison, N. B., Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2012). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society, 14(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, E. J., & Eastwick, P. W. (2009). Arbitrary social norms influence sex differences in romantic selectivity. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1290–1295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02439.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiore, A. T., & Donath, J. S. (2004). Online personals: An overview. CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1395–1398. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiore, A. T., Taylor, L. S., Zhong, X., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2010). Who’s Right and Who Writes: People, Profiles, Contacts, and Replies in Online Dating. 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in internet dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205285368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2009). Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01420.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. T., Toma, C., & Ellison, N. (2007). The truth about lying in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 449–452). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37(554), 269.Google Scholar
Joel, S., & Eastwick, P. W. (2018). Intervening earlier: An upstream approach to improving relationship quality. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732217745099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, D. M., & Hancock, J. T. (2018). Deception in mobile dating conversations. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, A. Jr, & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701543493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367–389). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M. J., Thomas, R. J., & Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), 17753–17758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908630116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, Z. (1975). Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(3), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(75)80025-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharabi, L. L. (2020). Online dating profiles, first-date interactions, and the enhancement of communication satisfaction and desires for future interaction. Communication Monographs, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1766094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharabi, L. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2017). What predicts first date success? A longitudinal study of modality switching in online dating. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharabi, L. L., & Dykstra-DeVette, T. A. (2019). From first email to first date: Strategies for initiating relationships in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3389–3407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518822780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, M., & Lee, J. S. (2020). Catfishing: A look into online dating and impersonation. In Meiselwitz, G. (Ed.), Social computing and social media. Design, ethics, user behavior, and social network analysis (pp. 349–358). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorell, T., & Whitty, M. (2019). Online romance scams and victimhood. Security Journal, 32(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-019-00166-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L., Fiore, A. T., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2011). “Out of my league”: A real-world test of the matching hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 942–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211409947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermans, E., & Courtois, C. (2018). From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: Exploring the experiences of Tinder users. The Information Society, 34(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1414093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017a). Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017b). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that’s the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209356437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2012). What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, S. T., Corriero, E. F., Matheny, R. G., & Hancock, J. T. (2018). Online daters’ willingness to use recommender technology for mate selection decisions. In IntRS@ RecSys (pp. 45–52).Google Scholar
Tong, S. T., Corriero, E. F., Wibowo, K. A., Makki, T. W., & Slatcher, R. B. (2020). Self-presentation and impressions of personality through text-based online dating profiles: A lens model analysis. New Media & Society, 22(5), 875–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819872678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, S. T., Hancock, J. T., & Slatcher, R. B. (2016a). Online dating system design and relational decision making: Choice, algorithms, and control. Personal Relationships, 23(4), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, S. T., Hancock, J. T., & Slatcher, R. B. (2016b). The influence of technology on romantic relationships: Understanding online dating. In Meiselwitz, G. (Ed.), Social computing and social media (Vol. 9742, pp. 162–173). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39910-2_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. (2011). Relational maintenance and computer-mediated communication. In Wright, K. B. & Webb, L. M. (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98-118) Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other (1st edition). Basic Books.Google Scholar
Uecker, J. E., & Regnerus, M. D. (2010). BARE MARKET: Campus sex ratios, romantic relationships, and sexual behavior. The Sociological Quarterly, 51(3), 408–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(5), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, J., & Parks, M. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In Knapp, M. L. and Daly, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd edn., pp. 529–563). Sage.Google Scholar
Whitty, M. T. (2008). Revealing the “real” me, searching for the “actual” you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1707–1723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitty, M. T. (2013). The scammers persuasive techniques model: Development of a stage model to explain the online dating romance scam. The British Journal of Criminology, 53(4), 665–684. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azt009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitty, M. T. (2015). Anatomy of the online dating romance scam. Security Journal, 28(4), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2012.57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×