Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-686fd747b7-4b24c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T14:26:16.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Variation and Social Change on Syrian Dissidents’ Social Media

A Sociopolitical Approach to a Digital Sociolinguistics of Arabic

from Part V - Arabic Linguistics and New Media Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2021

By
Francesco L. Sinatora
Edited by
Karin Ryding  and
David Wilmsen
Karin Ryding
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
David Wilmsen
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut
Get access

Summary

Taking on a contemporary topic of pervasive importance, Francesco Sinatora examines in detail linguistic heterogeneity and identity construction as they impact Arabic Facebook and YouTube discourse. Key issues of identity, positioning, performance, and multimodality are embedded in Arabic speakers’ use of discourse strategies that convey meaning in multiple ways and on multiple levels. ‘Social media’, states Sinatora, ‘provides a platform for the emergence of more hybrid practices, including the mixing of the vernaculars with MSA, as well as the localization of multilingual forms and global pop culture references.’ Sinatora reviews concepts of intertextuality and indexicality as they pertain to the use of language both written and spoken in Arabic-based social media. He connects these concepts to the idea of ‘vernacular globalization’, which refers to the linguistic construction of identities through diverse and multimodal formulation of powerful and appealing text messages. The second part of his paper documents how dissent is expressed through close examination of postings on Facebook and on YouTube. Through both written and spoken text analysis and face-to-face interviews with authors, Sinatora takes steps toward creating a new methodology for analysing variation in Arabic.

Keywords

FacebookmultimodalityvariationSyriahybriditywritingvernaculardiglossiacodeswitching
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics , pp. 532 - 562
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albirini, A. (2011). The sociolinguistic functions of codeswitching between Standard Arabic and Dialectal Arabic. Language in Society, 40(5), 537–62.Google Scholar
Al-Wer, E. (2002). Education as a speaker variable. In Rouchdy, A., ed., Language Contact and Language Conflict in Arabic: Variation on a Sociolinguistic Theme. London: Routledge Courzon, 41–53.Google Scholar
Al-Wer, E. (2013). Sociolinguistics. In Owens, J., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 241–63.Google Scholar
Al Zidjaly, N. (2014). WhatsApp Omani teachers? Social media and the question of social change. Multimodal Communication, 3(1), 107–30.Google Scholar
Al Zidjaly, N. (2019a). Society in digital contexts: New modes of identity and community construction, Multilingua, 38(4), 357–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Zidjaly, N. (2019b). Digital Activism as Nexus Analysis: A Sociolinguistic Example from Arabic Twitter. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 221.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5(8), 1–20.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913489198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, P. (1995). The pragmatics of codeswitching: A sequential approach. In Milroy, L. and Muysken, P., eds., One Speaker, Two Languages: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Codeswitching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 115–35.Google Scholar
Auer, P. (2005). A postscript: Codeswitching and social identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 403–10.Google Scholar
Badawi, E. A. (1973). Mustawayāt al-ʿArabiyya al-Muʿāṣira fī Miṣr [The Levels of Modern Arabic in Egypt]. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif.Google Scholar
Bailey, B. (2007). Heteroglossia and boundaries. In Heller, M., ed., Bilingualism: A Social Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 257–74.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Translated and edited by Michael Holquist and Caryl Emerson. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bassiouney, R. (2006). Functions of Code Switching in Egypt: Evidence from Monologues. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bassiouney, R. (2009). Arabic Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiouney, R. (2010). Identity and code-choice in the speech of educated women and men in Egypt: Evidence from talk shows. In Bassiouney, R., ed., Arabic and the Media. Leiden: Brill, 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiouney, R. (2012). Politicizing identity: Code choice and stance-taking during the Egyptian revolution. Discourse and Society, 23(2), 107–26.Google Scholar
Bassiouney, R. (2014). Language and Identity in Modern Egypt. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bassiouney, R. (2017a). A new direction for Arabic sociolinguistics. In Ouali, H., ed., Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIX: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–30.Google Scholar
Bassiouney, R. (ed.) (2017b). Identity and Dialect Performance: A Study of Communities and Dialects. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. and Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19: 59–88.Google Scholar
Blom, J. and Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structure: Codeswitching in Norway. In Gumperz, J. J., ed., Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston, 407–34.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2015a). Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 105–16.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2015b). Commentary: Superdiversity, old and new. Language and Communication: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 44(1), 82–9.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2016). Society in language: Some sociological effects of sociolinguistics. Paper presented at Connecting the Dots in a Glocalized World Third International Conference on Language, Linguistics, Literature and Translation, Sultan Qaboos University, 3–5 November 2016.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2017). Society through the Lens of Language: A New Look at Social Groups and Integration. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 178.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2019). From groups to actions and back in online-offline sociolinguistics, Multilingua, 38(4), 485–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. and De Fina, A. (2017). Chronotopic identities: On the timespace organization of who we are. In Ikizoglu, D., Wegner, J., and De Fina, A., eds., Diversity and Super-Diversity: Sociocultural Linguistic Perspectives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1–16.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Rampton, B. (2011). Language and superdiversity: A position paper. Diversities, 13(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Varis, P. (2011). Enough is enough: The heuristics of authenticity in superdiversity. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, Paper 2.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Varis, P. (2015). Enoughness, Accent and Light Communities: Essays on Contemporary Identities. Working paper. Tilburg: Tilburg University, Babylon Center.Google Scholar
Boussofara-Omar, N. (2003). Revisiting Arabic diglossic switching in light of the mlf model and its sub-models: The 4-M Model and the Abstract Level Model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
Brustad, K. (2017). Diglossia as ideology. In Mejdell, G. and Høigilt, J., eds., The Politics of Written Language in the Arab World. Leiden: Brill, 41–67.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (2003). Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(3), 398–416.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 584–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caubet, D. (2018). New elaborate written forms in Darija: Blogging, posting and slamming in Morocco. In Benmamoun, E. and Bassiouney, R., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. London: Routledge, 387–406.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (ed.) (2013). The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Daher, J. (1998). Gender in linguistic variation: The variable (q) in Damascus Arabic. In Benmamoun, E., Eid, M., and Haeri, N., eds., Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XI. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 183–208.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (2007). Style and stylization in the construction of identities in a card-playing club. In Auer, P., ed., Style and Social Identities. Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 57–84.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (2016). Storytelling and reactions in social media. Language in Society, 45(4), 473–98.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (2017). Dialect performances in superdiverse communities: The case for ethnographic approaches to language variation. In Bassiouney, R., ed., Identity and Dialect Performance. A Study of Communities and Dialects. London: Routledge, 49–67.Google Scholar
De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D., and Bamberg, M. G. W. (eds.) (2006). Discourse and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2003). The meaning of style. Texas Linguistic Forum, 47, 41–53.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2005). Variation, convention, and social meaning. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Oakland CA, 7 January 2005.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–76.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation studies: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87–100.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. R. (eds.) (2001). Introduction. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–19.Google Scholar
Eid, M. (1988). Principles of code switching between standard and Egyptian Arabic. Al-ʿArabiyya, 21(1/2), 51–79.Google Scholar
Eid, M. (2002). Language is a choice: Variation in Egyptian women’s written discourse. In Rouchdy, A., ed., Language Contact and Language Conflict in Arabic. Variations on a Sociolinguistic Theme, London: Routledge, 203–32.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(2), 325–40.Google Scholar
García, O. (2009). Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In Mohanty, A., Panda, M., Phillipson, R., and Skutnabb-Kangas, T., eds., Multilingual Education for Social Justice: Globalising the Local. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan, 140–58.Google Scholar
Gardner-Chloros, P. (1995). Codeswitching in community, regional and national repertoires: The myth of the discreteness of linguistic systems. In Milroy, L. and Muysken, P., eds., One Speaker, Two Languages: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Codeswitching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 68–89.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2011). ‘On for drinkies?’ Email cues of participant alignments. Language@Internet, 8. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2011/Georgakopoulou; last accessed 17 December 2020.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Habib, R. (2018). Standard Arabic [q]-lexical-borrowings in the speech of Syrian rural migrants. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 3(51), 1–12.Google Scholar
Hachimi, A. (2017). Moralizing stances: Discursive play and ideologies of language and gender in Moroccan digital discourse. In Høigilt, J. A. and Mejdell, G., eds., The Politics of Written Language in the Arab World: Writing Change. Leiden: Brill, 239–65.Google Scholar
Holes, C. (1987). Language Variation and Change in a Modernising Arab State: The Case of Bahrain. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Holes, C. (1993). The use of variation: A study of the political speeches of Gamal Abd al-Nasir. In Eid, M. and Holes, C., eds., Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, V. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgenson, N. J. (2008). Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(3), 161–76.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B., Andrus, J., and Danielson, A. E. (2006). Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of ‘Pittsburghese’. Journal of English Linguistics, 34(2), 77–104.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, M. (2014). Critical discourse analysis, power and new media discourse. In Kalyango, Y. Jr. and Kopytowska, M. W., eds., Why Discourse Matters: Negotiating Identity in the Mediatized World. New York: Peter Lang, 287–306.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, M. (2018). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). In Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. E., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Routledge, 582–96.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, M. and Esposito, E. (2018). Online hate, digital discourse and critique: Exploring digitally-mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics: Special Issue on Narrating Hostility, Challenging Hostile Narratives, 14.1(14), 45–68.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, M. and Zia, M. (2014). Persian nationalism, identity and anti-Arab sentiments in Iranian Facebook discourses: Critical discourse analysis and social media communication. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4), 755–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leppänen, S., Kytölä, S., Jousmäki, H., Peuronen, S., and Westinen, E. (2014). Entextualization and resemiotization as resources for identification in social media. In Seargeant, P. and Tagg, C., eds., The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 112–36.Google Scholar
Lister, C. R. (2015). The Syrian Jihad: Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State and the Evolution of an Insurgency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mejdell, G. (2006). Mixed Styles in Spoken Arabic in Egypt. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mejdell, G. (2011–2012) Diglossia, codeswitching, style, variation and congruence. Notions for analyzing mixed Arabic. Al-ʿArabiyya, 44/45, 29–39.Google Scholar
Mejdell, G. (2012). The elusiveness of lugha wusta, or, attempting to catch its ‘true nature’. In Bassiouney, R. and Katz, G., eds., Arabic Language and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Mejdell, G. (2014). Strategic bivalency in written ‘mixed style’? A reading of Ibrāhīm ʿīsā in al-Dustūr. In Durand, O., Langone, A. D., and Mion, G., eds., Alf lahǧa wa lahǧa: Proceedings of the 9th Aida Conference. Vienna: Lit Verlag, 263–72.Google Scholar
Mejdell, G. (2017). Changing norms, concepts and practices of written Arabic: A ‘long distance’ perspective. In Høigilt, J. and Mejdell, G., eds., The Politics of Written Language in the Arab World. Leiden: Brill, 68–89.Google Scholar
Mejdell, G. and Høigilt, J. (eds.) (2017). The Politics of Written Language in the Arab World. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Miller, C. (2003). Linguistic policies and the issue of ethno-linguistic minorities in the Middle East. In Usuki, A. and Kato, H., eds., Islam in the Middle Eastern Studies: Muslims and Minorities, Japan Center for Area Studies, Symposium Series 7, Osaka, Japan, 149–74.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1987). Language and Social Networks. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Møller, J. S. (2008). Polylingual performance among Turkish-Danes in late-modern Copenhagen. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(3), 217–36.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Social Motivations for Code Switching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1990). Indexicality and socialization. In Stigler, J. W., Schweder, R. A., and Herdt, G., eds., Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuji, E. and Pennycook, A. (2010). Metrolingualism: Fixity, fluidity and language in flux. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(3), 240–54.Google Scholar
Owens, J. (2001). Arabic sociolinguistics. Arabica, 48(4), 419–69.Google Scholar
Owens, J. and Bani-Yasin, R. (1991). Spoken Arabic and language mixture. Bulletin d’études orientales, 43, 17–31.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1999). Crossing. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1–2), 54–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubdy, R. and Alsagoff, L. (eds.) (2014). The Global–Local Interface and Hybridity: Exploring Language and Identity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, N. (2002). Investigating stylistic variation. In Chambers, J., Trudgill, P., and Schilling-Estes, N., eds., The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Oxford: Blackwell, 375–401.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication, 23(3–4), 193–229.Google Scholar
Sinatora, F. L. (2019). Chronotopes, entextualization and Syrian political activism on Facebook. Multilingua, 38(4), 427–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinatora, F. L. (2020). Language, Identity and Syrian Political Activism on Social Media. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Somekh, S. (1991). Genre and Language in Modern Arabic Literature. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Y. (2003). The Arabic Language and National Identity: A Study in Ideology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Y. (2013). Arabic in the Fray. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Varis, P. and Wang, X. (2011). Superdiversity on the Internet: A case from China. Diversities, 13(2), 71–83.Google Scholar
Versteegh, K. (2001). The Arabic Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–54.Google Scholar
Wedeen, L. (2013). Ideology and humor in dark times: Notes from Syria. Critical Inquiry, 39(4), 841–73.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. A. (1999). Simultaneity and bivalency as strategies in bilingualism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 8(1), 3–29.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. A. (2013). Is the personal political? Chronotopes and changing stances toward Catalan language and identity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 16(2), 210–24.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×