Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 The Textual History of Spinoza’s Ethics
- 2 The Geometrical Order in the Ethics
- 3 Spinoza’s Ontology
- 4 Substance Monism and Identity Theory in Spinoza
- 5 Spinoza and the Stoics on Substance Monism
- 6 Spinoza on Necessity
- 7 Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics
- 8 Spinoza on Action
- 9 The Anatomy of the Passions
- 10 Freedom, Slavery, and the Passions
- 11 Spinoza’s Theory of the Good
- 12 The Power of Reason in Spinoza
- 13 Spinoza on the Essence of the Human Body and the Part of the Mind That Is Eternal
- Bibliography
- Index
12 - The Power of Reason in Spinoza
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2010
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 The Textual History of Spinoza’s Ethics
- 2 The Geometrical Order in the Ethics
- 3 Spinoza’s Ontology
- 4 Substance Monism and Identity Theory in Spinoza
- 5 Spinoza and the Stoics on Substance Monism
- 6 Spinoza on Necessity
- 7 Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics
- 8 Spinoza on Action
- 9 The Anatomy of the Passions
- 10 Freedom, Slavery, and the Passions
- 11 Spinoza’s Theory of the Good
- 12 The Power of Reason in Spinoza
- 13 Spinoza on the Essence of the Human Body and the Part of the Mind That Is Eternal
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
In the preface to Part 5 of the Ethics Spinoza promises to explain “the power of the mind, or of reason” and to “show, above all, how great its dominion over the affects is, and what kind of dominion it has for restraining and moderating them.” This is an important task because of the ethical significance that Spinoza accords to reason. For example, Spinoza writes, “Acting absolutely from virtue is nothing else in us but acting, living, and preserving our being . . . by the guidance of reason. (4p24)” / In other words, Spinoza identifies acting virtuously with acting rationally. Spinoza also identifies acting by the guidance of reason and freedom: “we . . . easily see what the difference is between a man who is led only by an affect, or by opinion, and one who is led by reason. For the former, whether he will or no, does those things he is most ignorant of, whereas the latter complies with no one's wishes but his own, and does only those things he knows to be the most important in life, and therefore desires very greatly. Hence, I call the former a slave, but the latter, a free man. (4p66s)”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's Ethics , pp. 258 - 283Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
- 14
- Cited by