Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T09:16:37.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selected Bibliography and Guide to Further Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2022

Edited by
Amanda Hiner  and
Elizabeth Tasker Davis
Amanda Hiner
Affiliation:
Winthrop University, South Carolina
Elizabeth Tasker Davis
Affiliation:
Stephen F. Austin State University, Texas
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
British Women Satirists in the Long Eighteenth Century , pp. 284 - 290
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Bloom, Edward A., and Bloom, Lillian D.. Satire’s Persuasive Voice. Ithaca, ny: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Bogel, Fredric V. The Difference Satire Makes: Rhetoric and Reading from Jonson to Byron. Ithaca, ny: Cornell University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bricker, Andrew Benjamin. “Libel and Satire: The Problem with Naming.” ELH 81 (2014): 889–921.Google Scholar
Bullard, Paddy (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-Century Satire. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Carretta, Vincent. The Snarling Muse: Verbal and Visual Satire from Pope to Churchill. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Connery, Brian A., and Combe, Kirk (eds.). Theorizing Satire: Essays in Literary Criticism. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Dyer, Gary. British Satire and the Politics of Style 1789–1832. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Elkin, P. K. The Augustan Defence of Satire. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Elliott, Robert C. The Power of Satire: Magic, Ritual, Art. Princeton University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Leonard. Introduction to Satire. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Leonard. The Satirist: His Temperament, Motivation, and Influence. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Gatrell, Vic. City of Laughter: Sex and Satire in Eighteenth-Century London. London: Atlantic, 2006.Google Scholar
Gill, James E. (ed.). Cutting Edges: Postmodern Critical Essays on Eighteenth-Century Satire. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Jonathan. The Cambridge Introduction to Satire. Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Griffin, Dustin H. Satire: A Critical Reintroduction. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1994.Google Scholar
Guilhamet, Leon. Satire and the Transformation of Genre. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hammond, Brean. “Verse Satire.” In A Companion to Eighteenth-Century Poetry, ed. Gerrard, Christine, 369–85. Malden, ma: Blackwell, 2006.Google Scholar
Highet, Gilbert. The Anatomy of Satire. Princeton University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Jack, Ian. Augustan Satire: Intention and Idiom in English Poetry, 1660–1750. Oxford University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Jensen, H. James, and Zirker, Malvin R. Jr. (eds.). The Satirist’s Art. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Carter. Critical Synoptics: Menippean Satire and the Analysis of Intellectual Mythology. Plainsboro, nj: Associated University Presses, 2000.Google Scholar
Kernan, Alvin B. The Cankered Muse: Satire of the English Renaissance. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Kernan, Alvin B. The Plot of Satire. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Knight, Charles A. The Literature of Satire. Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupersmith, William. English Versions of Roman Satire in the Earlier Eighteenth Century. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Love, Harold. English Clandestine Satire, 1660–1702. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Marshall, Ashley. The Practice of Satire in England, 1658–1770. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
McRae, Andrew. Literature, Satire and the Early Stuart State. Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Felicity. The Brink of All We Hate: English Satires on Women Writers 1660–1750. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1984.Google Scholar
Palmeri, Frank. Satire, History, Novel: Narrative Forms, 1665–1815. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Paulson, Ronald. The Fictions of Satire. Baltimore md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, Ronald. Satire and the Novel in Eighteenth-Century England. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Paulson, Ronald. (ed.). Satire: Modern Essays in Criticism. Upper Saddle River, nj: Prentice-Hall, 1971.Google Scholar
Phiddian, Robert. “Satire and the Limits of Literary Theories.” Critical Quarterly 55/3 (2013): 44–58.Google Scholar
Quintero, Ruben (ed.). A Companion to Satire: Ancient and Modern. Malden, ma: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Rabb, Melinda Alliker. Satire and Secrecy in English Literature from 1650 to 1750. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Rawson, Claude. Satire and Sentiment 1660–1830: Stress Points in the English Augustan Tradition. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Rawson, Claude. “Swift, Satire, and the Novel.” In Prose Fiction in English from the Origins of Print to 1750, ed. Keymer, Thomas, 530–47. Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Rawson, Claude. (ed.). English Satire and the Satiric Tradition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar
Seidel, Michael. “Satire, Lampoon, Libel, Slander.” In The Cambridge Companion to English Literature 1650–1740, ed. Zwicker, Steven N., 33–57. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Seidel, Michael. The Satiric Inheritance: Rabelais to Sterne. Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Selden, Raman. English Verse Satire, 1590–1765. London: Allen & Unwin, 1978.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. On the Discourse of Satire: Towards a Stylistic Model of Satirical Humor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003.Google Scholar
Sutherland, James. English Satire. Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W. O. S. Jr. The Art of the Satirist: Essays on the Satire of Augustan England. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Test, George A. Satire: Spirit and Art. Tampa: University of South Florida Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Walker, Hugh. English Satire and Satirists. New York: Octagon, 1965.Google Scholar
Weinbrot, Howard D. Eighteenth-Century Satire. Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Weinbrot, Howard D. The Formal Strain: Studies in Augustan Imitation and Satire. University of Chicago Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Weinbrot, Howard D. Menippean Satire Reconsidered: From Antiquity to the Eighteenth Century. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Worcester, David. The Art of Satire. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 1940.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Baines, Paul. “Female Satirists of the Eighteenth Century.” In A Companion to British Literature, vol. iii: Long Eighteenth Century Literature 1660–1837, ed. DeMaria, Robert Jr., Chang, Heesok, and Zacher, Samantha, 95–112. Hoboken, nj: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.Google Scholar
Ballaster, Ros. “Manl(e)y Forms: Sex and the Female Satirist.” In Women, Texts & Histories 1575–1760, ed. Brant, Clare and Purkiss, Diane, 217–41. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Campbell, Jill. “Sexing Satire.” In The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-Century Satire, ed. Bullard, Paddy, 558–74. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Chico, Tita. Designing Women: The Dressing Room in Eighteenth-Century English Literature and Culture. Lewisburg, pa: Bucknell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Curran, Louise. “Self-Portraiture.” In The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-Century Satire, ed. Bullard, Paddy, 438–56. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Fabricant, Carole. “The Shared Worlds of Manley and Swift.” In Pope, Swift, and Women Writers, ed. Mell, Donald C., 154–78. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Festa, Lynn. “Satire to Sentiment: Mixing Modes in the Later Eighteenth-Century British Novel.” In The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-Century Satire, ed. Bullard, Paddy, 645–60. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Fung, Julian. “Frances Burney as Satirist.” Modern Language Review, 106/4 (2011): 937–53.Google Scholar
Harris, Jocelyn. Satire, Celebrity, and Politics in Jane Austen. Lewisburg, pa: Bucknell University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hensbergen, Claudine van. “The Female Wits: Gender, Satire, and Drama.” In The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-Century Satire, ed. Bullard, Paddy, 74–90. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Johns-Putra, Adeline. “Satire and Domesticity in Late Eighteenth-Century Women’s Poetry: Minding the Gap.” Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 33/1 (2010): 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kairoff, Claudia Thomas. “Gendering Satire: Behn to Burney.” In A Companion to Satire: Ancient and Modern, ed. Quintero, Ruben, 276–92. Malden, ma: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Mason, Nicholas. “Austen’s Emma and the Gendering of Enlightenment Satire.” Persuasions: Journal of the Jane Austen Society of North America 25 (2003): 213–19.Google Scholar
Rabb, Melinda Alliker. “Angry Beauties: (Wo)Manley Satire and the Stage.” In Cutting Edges: Postmodern Critical Essays on Eighteenth-Century Satire, ed. Gill, James, 127–58. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Rabb, Melinda Alliker. “‘Little Snarling Lapdogs’: Satire and Domesticity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-Century Satire, ed. Bullard, Paddy, 457–72. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Rabb, Melinda Alliker. “Satire.” In The Cambridge Companion to Women’s Writing in Britain, 1660–1789, ed. Ingrassia, Catherine, 147–63. Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Rabb, Melinda Alliker. Satire and Secrecy in English Literature from 1650 to 1750. New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2007.Google Scholar
Rabb, Melinda Alliker. “Secret History, Parody, Satire.” In The Secret History in Literature, ed. Bullard, Rebecca and Carnell, Rachel, 103–16. Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Rabb, Melinda Alliker. “The Secret Life of Satire.” In A Companion to Satire: Ancient and Modern, ed. Quintero, Ruben, 568–84. Malden, ma: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Rabb, Melinda Alliker. “Swift and the ‘Manley’ Style.” In Pope, Swift, and Women Writers: Modern Essays in Criticism, ed. Mell, Donald C., 125–53. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Sabor, Peter. “Jane Austen: Satirical Historian.” In Swift’s Travels: Eighteenth-Century British Satire and Its Legacy, ed. Hudson, Nicholas and Santesso, Aaron, 217–32. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Santesso, Aaron. “The New Atalantis and Varronian Satire.” Philological Quarterly 79/2 (March 2000): 177–204.Google Scholar
Staves, Susan. “Battle Joined, 1715–1737.” In A Literary History of Women’s Writing in Britain, 1660–1789, 166–227. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Taylor, David Francis. “Edgeworth’s Belinda and the Gendering of Caricature.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 26 (2014): 593–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gillian. “Fable and Allegory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-Century Satire, ed. Bullard, Paddy, 266–80. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Young, Elizabeth V. “De-Gendering Genre: Aphra Behn and the Tradition of English Verse Satire.” Philological Quarterly 81 (2002): 185–205.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Backscheider, Paula R. “Eighteenth-Century Women Poets.” In The Cambridge History of English Literature, 1660–1780, ed. Richetti, John, 209–34. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Backscheider, Paula R. Eighteenth-Century Women Poets and Their Readers: Inventing Agency, Inventing Genre. Baltimore, md: John Hopkins University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backscheider, Paula R. (ed.). Revising Women: Eighteenth-Century Women’s Fiction and Social Engagement. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ballaster, Ros. Seductive Forms: Women’s Amatory Fiction from 1684 to 1740. Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Ballaster, Ros(ed.). The History of British Women’s Writing, vol. iv: 1690–1750. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Barash, Carol. English Women’s Poetry, 1649–1714: Politics, Community, and Linguistic Authority. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Batchelor, Jennie. “Influence, Intertextuality and Agency: Eighteenth-Century Women Writers and the Politics of Remembering.” Women’s Writing 20/1 (2013): 1–12.Google Scholar
Batchelor, Jennie. Women’s Work: Labour, Gender, Authorship, 1750–1830. Manchester University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Batchelor, Jennie, and Kaplan, Cora (eds.). British Women’s Writing in the Long Eighteenth Century: Authorship, Politics and History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Brown, Susan, Clements, Patricia, and Grundy, Isobel (eds.). Orlando: Women’s Writing in the British Isles from the Beginnings to the Present. Internet resource. Cambridge University Press, 2006. http://orlando.cambridge.org.Google Scholar
Carlile, Susan (ed.). Masters of the Marketplace: British Women Novelists of the 1750s. Bethlehem, pa: Lehigh University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Cohen, Roger. “Genre Theory, Literary History, and Historical Change.” In Theoretical Issues in Literary History, ed. Perkins, David, 85–113. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Eger, Elizabeth, Grant, Charlotte, Gallchoir, Clíona Ó, and Warburton, Penny (eds.). Women, Writing, and the Public Sphere 1700–1830. Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ezell, Margaret J. M. Writing Women’s Literary History. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. Nobody’s Story: The Vanishing Acts of Women Writers in the Marketplace, 1670–1820. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Gevirtz, Karen Bloom. “Ladies Reading and Writing: Eighteenth-Century Women Writers and the Gendering of Critical Discourse.” Modern Language Studies 33/1–2 (2003): 60–72.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan (eds.). Shakespeare’s Sisters: Feminist Essays on Women Poets. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Gray, Catherine. Women Writers and Public Debate in Seventeenth-Century Britain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Grundy, Isobel, and Wiseman, Susan (eds.). Women, Writing, History: 1640–1740. London: B. T. Batsford, 1992.Google Scholar
Hobby, Elaine. Virtue of Necessity: English Women’s Writing 1649–88. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Ingrassia, Catherine (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Women’s Writing in Britain, 1660–1789. Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Johnson, Claudia. Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s: Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen. University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Johnston, Elizabeth. “‘Deadly Snares’: Female Rivalry, Gender, Ideology, and Eighteenth-Century Women Writers.” Studies in the Literary Imagination 47/2 (2014): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Vivien (ed.). Women and Literature in Britain 1700–1800. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Justice, George L., and Tinker, Nathan (eds.). Women’s Writing and the Circulation of Ideas: Manuscript Publication in England, 1550–1800. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Deborah. Poetic Sisters: Early Eighteenth-Century Women Poets. Lewisburg, pa: Bucknell University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Knott, Sarah, and Taylor, Barbara (eds.). Women, Gender, and Enlightenment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Labbe, Jacqueline (ed.) The History of British Women’s Writing, vol. v: 1750–1830. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jayne. “Compositions of Ill Nature: Women’s Place in a Satiric Tradition.” Critical Matrix 2/2 (1986): 31–69.Google Scholar
Looser, Devoney. British Women Writers and the Writing of History, 1670–1820. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
McDowell, Paula. The Women of Grub Street: Gender, Press, and Politics in the London Literary Marketplace 1678–1730. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Messenger, Ann. His and Hers: Essays in Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Literature. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1986.Google Scholar
Myers, Sylvia Harcstark. The Bluestocking Circle: Women, Friendship, and the Life of the Mind in Eighteenth-Century England. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Newton, Judith Lowder. Women, Power, and Subversion: Social Strategies in British Fiction, 1778–1860. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1981.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Karen. Women and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Anita (ed.). A Companion to Early Modern Women’s Writing. Malden, ma: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar
Pearson, Jacqueline. Women’s Reading in Britain, 1750–1835: A Dangerous Recreation. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen. University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Prescott, Sarah. Women, Authorship, and Literary Culture, 1690–1740. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Betty A. The Professionalization of Women Writers in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Schofield, Mary Anne, and Macheski, Cecilia (eds.). Fetter’d or Free: British Women Novelists, 1670–1815. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Shevelow, Kathryn. Women and Print Culture: The Construction of Femininity in the Early Periodical. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Siskin, Clifford. The Work of Writing: Literature and Social Change in Britain 1700–1830. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. Reading Eighteenth-Century Poetry. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Spencer, Jane. The Rise of the Woman Novelist: From Aphra Behn to Jane Austen. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale. Mothers of the Novel: 100 Good Women Writers before Jane Austen. London: Pandora Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Stanton, Judith P. “Statistical Profile of Women Writing in English from 1660 to 1800.” In Eighteenth-Century Women and the Arts, ed. Keener, Frederick M. and Lorsch, Susan E., 247–54. Westport, ct: Greenwood Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Staves, Susan. A Literary History of Women’s Writing in Britain, 1660–1789. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Stern, Kimberly J. The Social Life of Criticism: Gender, Critical Writing, and the Politics of Belonging. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara, and Knott, Sarah. Women, Gender, and Enlightenment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Todd, Janet. The Sign of Angellica: Women, Writing and Fiction, 1660–1800. New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Turner, Cheryl. Living by the Pen: Women Writers in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Allen, Charles A., and Stephens, George D. (eds.). Satire: Theory and Practice. Belmont, ca: Wadsworth, 1962.Google Scholar
Heaney, Peter (ed.). An Anthology of Eighteenth-Century Satire: Grub Street. Lewiston, ny: Edwin Mellin Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Lord, George de F. (ed.). Poems on Affairs of State, 1660–1678. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Rousseau, George S., and Rudenstine, Neil L. (eds.). English Poetic Satire: Wyatt to Byron. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.Google Scholar
Wells, Carolyn (ed.). A Satire Anthology. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1905.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×